It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ron Paul Press Conference: No Run For President (2008)

page: 4
36
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2008 @ 07:17 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


The problem with both candidates, Rep. and Dem., is not so much the promise of 'change' without a concrete 'plan' but that both sides are FUNDED and owed favors in return for those doing the 'funding'...the international banking cartel.

There should be no more 'divide and conquer' techniques such as infighting amongst the 2 parties (Democrats and Republicans) to distract the voter for the purpose of those funding the candidates.

I don't dislike either candidate though what concerns me is who is owed favors in return for getting them elected in the first place.

The international banking elite is notorious for funding BOTH sides, both Democrats and Republicans to ensure that the international banking cartel is owed 'favors', pork barrel projects and other means of undue influence. They operate in secrecy in the background like an unseen master at the healm of a Pinnocchio. They pull the strings and when they don't get their way.....they send in the 'enforcers' or highly 'strategically' placed agents within the NSA, Mossad, CIA, FBI, Dod, Dept. of Homeland Security etc. to commit crimes of espionage, payoffs, death threats, settups (ie. Monica Lewinski), favors, illegal campaign contributions etc. etc..

The international banking cartel will stop at nothing to divide and conquer....strike fear in the people (9/11) etc. WTC93, USS Liberty, etc. etc. to achieve their ends. What is 'good' for the American people as well as the rest of the world is of little or no importance; just as long as their 'plans' are on schedule. Are we not getting closer to realizing a NWO?

They have adopted a Machiavelian political scheme of which ....'nothing' is out of bounds to further an agenda to achieve an END. This same cartel, one will find own majority stock interest in our defense companies, intelligence companies, oil companies, gold mining and gold in Fed. depositories, diamond industry and every industry with any importance. Their 'investments' or controlling interests in various industries are concealed to public view via an elaborate system of SHELL corporations concealing ownership. These shell corporations are often 'offshore' for added security. What these people fear the most is Exposure.

Don't take my word for all of the above; take theirs and/or their victims throughout history:

quotes.liberty-tree.ca...

quotes.liberty-tree.ca...

quotes.liberty-tree.ca...

quotes.liberty-tree.ca...

Home schooling anyone? Can anyone afford to have their children programmed by the DOE of which this same cartel had designed and placed their 'people' in office to control that which is taught?
Do our children need a thwarted, biased, programmed, neuro-marketed education and totally inefficient educational system of which is further bankrupting local govts.?

Is not a more efficient and professional educational system available online right now for use in educating one from preschool through University? Would it not save the taxpayer a fortune whether administered at home or in the local school systems? Is it not an added benefit that the parent can choose to admit/omit that which they choose to while educating their own child?


[edit on 9/11/2008 by oceanaut1]

[edit on 9/11/2008 by oceanaut1]

[edit on 9/11/2008 by oceanaut1]

[edit on 9/11/2008 by oceanaut1]

[edit on 9/11/2008 by oceanaut1]

[edit on 9/11/2008 by oceanaut1]




posted on Sep, 11 2008 @ 07:19 PM
link   
reply to post by MidnightDStroyer
 


True, it appears I went overboard with all the email postings though I wanted to make sure the 'message' was received and a 'link' not overlooked. I think they got the message.



posted on Sep, 11 2008 @ 07:27 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


video.google.com...


[edit on 9/12/2008 by oceanaut1]



posted on Sep, 11 2008 @ 07:42 PM
link   
hey all, I ve seen Chuck Baldwin speak at two of Rons Rallys in washington. Check him out. he may not have asked Ron to be VP but Ive never seen Bar at any events for paul.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Sep, 11 2008 @ 08:11 PM
link   
also very inspirational guy not running for President, Adam Kokesh

in washington for freedom march
www.youtube.com...

or/and

at the rally for the republic in MN
www.youtube.com...

hope he gets to run for office before we all die fighting the system

[edit on 11-9-2008 by lunchmanstan]



posted on Sep, 11 2008 @ 09:52 PM
link   
www.youtube.com...


[edit on 9/12/2008 by oceanaut1]



posted on Sep, 12 2008 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Doesnt mean we cant write Dr. Paul in.................NEVER GIVE UP i know im not voting like the norm this year but some one has to start the trend of moving towards a 3rd party otherwise we are the problem with politics NOT the politicians, we vote them into power.



posted on Sep, 12 2008 @ 11:39 AM
link   
The wealthiest class wins all of the presidential elections.



posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 06:13 AM
link   
In the effort to deny ignorance please check out this story Barr's Manager Praises Bush

Bob Barr:
-Former Republican Senator
-Voted for the Patriot Act
-Supported the War on Drugs
-Helped lead the impeachment of Clinton ($40-$65 billion expenditure)
-Was regarded as one of the most conservative members of Congress
-Authored Defense of Marriage Act
-Voted for the Iraq War Resolution
-Proposed a ban on Wicca in the military

Barr has since reversed many of his stances and does appear to be the most libertarian candidate available, however his record cannot be ignored. I would ask that Ron Paul supporters consider the past actions of Barr before giving him their vote. It is lamentable in the extreme that Paul won't be running and that we are left with not a single attractive alternative. I would also like Ron Paul supporters to consider the strong socialist leanings of Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney (as candidate for the Green Party).

In any case, we all know that we cannot win this election, the future seems grim.



posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by EtSolveMundi
 


That's probably why Alex Jones called him a shill, and said he is not trustworthy. I have serious doubts Ron Paul will accept, and I have been checking quite a bit to see if Ron Paul has responded. So far that I can tell, he has not. He could actually do it if he wanted though, without losing his House seat. But at the core I think there are too many differences in their views. The Barr inconsistency record is probably enough in itself to stop Mr. Consistent (RP) from going through with it.



posted on Sep, 14 2008 @ 07:47 PM
link   
reply to post by ...and justice for some
 


I will write him in, unless war with iran is sparked before the election, then i

spite cast a vote for obama.

The only real chance we have to avoid a future scripted by the likes of the john

titors out there is to avoid mainstream maneuvers, like voting for one of

a 2 party system's candidates.

WRITE IN RON PAUL.

W.I.R.P



posted on Sep, 14 2008 @ 10:01 PM
link   
I AM GLAD he;s not running !!!!!!!

I support him and like his message (95% of it).

BUT........ He said before he WOULD NOT run as an independant and if he flip flopped now he would be no better than all the others.

The main thing I like about him is that I feel he honesty & integrty and if he starts going back on what he says he is just another politician.



posted on Sep, 15 2008 @ 11:12 PM
link   
Well, here's a curious update, lol.

Ron Paul may not be running, but some people over at the Ron Paul forums apparently are getting him (Pres) and Barry Goldwater, Jr. (VP) on the LA ballot, without either of their knowledge or consent. They set up a fund and secured the money at the last minute to pay the fee, and the log of the whole thing is here:

www.ronpaulforums.com...

Some people just don't take no for an answer. God bless their hearts.



posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 05:22 PM
link   
He is a good man and hope contimues being a watch dog for us



posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 10:56 PM
link   
I plan on writting in Ron Paul any way I can...if I have to tape a sticker to the ballot card with his name on it I will...

After the results of all the debates he was allowed in and the current state of the financial system I am appauled and saddened that he is not able to run.

It just tells me that the majority of the people that do vote have no idea what is going on in the world, too many just blindly vote blue or red.

And the people that DO know what is going on don't get out and vote, probably because we fell it doesn't matter...but we need to do it, we need to vote and vote now and vote loudly...I think I'm going to make or get a t-shirt that says I'm writing in Ron Paul when I go to vote



posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 06:24 PM
link   
www.campaignforliberty.com...

UPDATE:

Ron Paul endorses Chuck Baldwin!


I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.


As to him running for VP with Barr, I would assume that's totally out, as predicted.

Well since this is the guy RP wants, as careful as he is about his actions and his research, and who he aligns with, there must be real good reason for him choosing Chuck. It will be curious to see how many RP supporters will embrace his decision, and support CB. Already there are comments saying they are writing in RP, no matter what or who, and that RP is the only one they trust. I urge you to reconsider, and take a hard look at Chuck Baldwin.



posted on Sep, 9 2011 @ 04:17 PM
link   
History will repeat itself.



posted on Sep, 9 2011 @ 05:47 PM
link   
Ron Paul May not want to see a 3rd party, but one of the 2 may be replaced at sometime.



posted on Sep, 9 2011 @ 09:25 PM
link   
do you guys realize this thread was made in 2008? its a 4 year old thread, just saying it, because i do remember reading this thread back then.



posted on Sep, 9 2011 @ 09:34 PM
link   
I was seriously about to get
..until i realised it was 4 years old! LOL!! When I checked RP's FB pages, and it was talking about his polls, I did a double take on the date on this post.

PHEW!!



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join