It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nice answer but all it does is prove that the bible has errors and therefore not the infallible word of god as many assume it to be.
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by shihulud
S, No problem, thanks for the transparency….’amber nectar’ huh? Sounds great !
OK, good question…here’s my research…
Source quoted below…www.greatcom.org...
“In the Gospel according to Matthew, ...
....I had never heard this question before…thanks for raising it….I’m going to tilt to my first reference, ok?
OT honored for the discussion...what did you think of Bono's piece?
There is a big difference in translation variance between names so I really cannot be swayed into scribal error on this one (I am aware of the Jesus quote error as well). Mainly due to the supposed tradition of copyists being exact with oral tradition - remember there were very few literate people at the time and also as Greek and Hebrew/Aramaic were being spoke and well understood at that time. Hell the NT was written in Greek by Hebrew/Aramaic jews (supposedly - Matthew, Mark etc) so we can't really subscribe to the notion of such common error.
Originally posted by OldThinker
S, Here's another source I found...www.new-life.net...
Allow New Testament Citations of the Old Testament to be Less Than Exact Quotations. - Critics often point to variations in the NT's use of the OT Scriptures as a proof of error. They seem to forget that the OT was written in Hebrew, the NT in Greek. Translations from one language to another can and often do differ without being in error.
In addition, critics forget that every citation need not be an exact quotation. It was then (and still is today) a perfectly acceptable literary style to give the true essence of a statement without using precisely the exact words. The same meaning can be conveyed without using the exact same verbal expressions.
Sometimes the New Testament authors will cite only part of the OT text (Jesus did this in Luke 4:18-19, citing Isaiah 61:1-2). Sometimes the NT summarizes the OT text (Matthew 2:6). Others blend two texts into one (Matthew 27:9-10). Sometimes they change the speaker (compare Zechariah 12:10 with John 19:37). This was perfectly acceptable Jewish rabbinic practice. We must not insist that the NT writers have to stick to 21st century college rules for quotation (when they did not even know what 21st century college rules would be)!
Thoughts, sir?
OT
ps: potential answer here...www.christiancourier.com...
[edit on 17-9-2008 by OldThinker]
[edit on 17-9-2008 by OldThinker]
Not at all, I am well aware of many of the contradictions in the bible, I'm like a dentist and pull them out one at a time LOL. Its not worth trying to bombard them!!!
Originally posted by Lannock
EDIT: To Shihulud and noobfun: If you guys only take into account the "Jeremiah/Zechariah" FARCE that OT concocted and the FACT that the Christians give a total blind eye to the "NOAH" argument, you realise that you guys are wasting your time?
[edit on 18-9-2008 by Lannock]
Originally posted by moocowman
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by JesusisTruth
Great posts my man!!! You spent a lot of time here...good job!!
Agree with most...
I would be irresponsible to not share my relationship with Jesus...I'm commanded to content for the faith and to love...check out John 13:34, 25---this is my life's anthem...it's on my signature below...
How will they know, ,unless someone tells them...and who will tell them, unless someone sends one to teach? paraphrase, I think Romans?
OT
Hey dude, how goes? got ur U2U, why doesn't U2U let me know I got mail? or if it does, what does it look like?
So, oldthinker dude, I have to respectfully ask - if you have a relationship with the Jesusgod, why do you need a bible.
It is common knowledge that the bible is full of errors and contradictions etc so why do you need something that is flawed when you have perfection to answer all your questions ?
Would you be kind enough to ask jesus some questions on behalf of other people ? This would surely save all the hassle debate and quarreling (even wars) by getting a straight answer instead of trying to make sense of a nonsensical book with questionable authorship.
Had a look at Bono's piece (sounds quite rude that LOL) but fail to see what he has said thats any different to the views of most christians.
Originally posted by OldThinker
PS: Go back after the amber nectar, smile...and check out Bono's peice, ok?
I'm sorry????? Did you even read this guy's site???? You have a barefaced cheek to imply that ATHEISTS HAVE THEIR HEADS STUCK IN THE SAND AND IGNORE PROBABILITY!!!!! Getting a 3 year old Mary to walk a 240 mile round trip (she would have probably been about 8 by the time she'd finished) - Hell I have bother getting my 3 year old to walk half a mile plus my girlfriend is 20 weeks pregnant and even she has bother. This guy must not have kids.
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by shihulud
S, Sorry it took so long to get back to you...
Good question...I don't know...Didn't everyone walk alot back then?
This guy thinks she walked a whole bunch more?? ...www.blessitt.com...
Here's a few other sources as well...She was very young/teenager, healthy and strong...don't think she had a donkey in this part of the story??
What the hell is that even supposed to mean??
Originally posted by OldThinker
OT's got some more incredible predictions about Jesus...many many years before...
As a statistician, I can't ignore the odds...
==
Prediction: Jesus would bind up the brokenhearted, proclaim liberty to the captives and announce the acceptable year of the Lord
Prediction: Jesus would heal people of disease and sickness
Prediction: Jesus would teach in parables
Prediction: Jesus would be tender and compassionate
Prediction: Jesus would be meek and humble
Originally posted by shihulud
I'm sorry????? Did you even read this guy's site???? You have a barefaced cheek to imply that ATHEISTS HAVE THEIR HEADS STUCK IN THE SAND AND IGNORE PROBABILITY!!!!! Getting a 3 year old Mary to walk a 240 mile round trip (she would have probably been about 8 by the time she'd finished) - Hell I have bother getting my 3 year old to walk half a mile plus my girlfriend is 20 weeks pregnant and even she has bother. This guy must not have kids.
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by shihulud
S, Sorry it took so long to get back to you...
Good question...I don't know...Didn't everyone walk alot back then?
This guy thinks she walked a whole bunch more?? ...www.blessitt.com...
Here's a few other sources as well...She was very young/teenager, healthy and strong...don't think she had a donkey in this part of the story??
Then to suppose that a nearly 9 month pregnant woman is going to walk 90 miles for a census - after all she didn't have a donkey according to Mr Blessitt (that can't be his real name??). This guy has no idea. To even assume this as a reasonable answer and your previous retort means your not living up to your avatar of Old Thinker.
Do you REALLY think that these answers are probable????
G
[edit on 25-9-2008 by shihulud]
[edit on 25-9-2008 by shihulud]
G
Originally posted by Lannock
Originally posted by GMoney1
reply to post by shihulud
For my part I would have long since become exasperated by the lack of faith being displayed here. To deny the existence of an intelligent organizerof universal orderliness, would be as ludicrous as BELIEVING THAT THE VERY EXISTENCE OF CYBER SPACE CAME ABOUT BY CHANCE.!! No one with an ounce of intelligence could ascribe to such a belief. Yet you hold on to such views with great pride and reverence.
No one with an ounce of intelligence would think that the Bible is the word of God. But you are Christians and you cannot help yourself.
EDIT: To Shihulud and noobfun: If you guys only take into account the "Jeremiah/Zechariah" FARCE that OT concocted and the FACT that the Christians give a total blind eye to the "NOAH" argument, you realise that you guys are wasting your time?
[edit on 18-9-2008 by Lannock]
Hi OT, feeling quite good thanks for asking - Yourself?
Originally posted by OldThinker
..........
...Thus His ministry of travel started….at least that’s my take on it…
I was looking for some video/movie online of the crowd trying to push him off but I could find…here’s a ppt. slide 7 and following give some more insight into the meaning of this passage…sorry I couldn’t find more..
I hope you are good!!!
OT out…until next time!!!!
The Mathematical Odds of Jesus Fulfilling Prophecy