It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
Athiest that are open to truth and miracles are rare, you might run into on this thread the ones with no openess at all because many don't want God to be real.
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
It's easier to be open to a God then to be open to nothing which athiesm is.
I'm talking about open to the existence of God, not the idea of nothing. Furthermore noob. I have read about countless saints miracles. God worked them himself. I have seen these miracles in my own life.
like I said, usually miracles are proof enough not including nature, but this is the X factor which enhances our faith further and thus is why it's almost impossible for us to be open to the belief in nothing.
I am open to respect to others, no doubt, but the things I seen personally. I couldn't disbelieve if I wanted to.
peacw.
Since when has math been 'fictitious'?
Originally posted by riley
I've read books where psychics have predicted things and then they came true.
Does that stop those books being fiction?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Since when has math been 'fictitious'?
Originally posted by riley
I've read books where psychics have predicted things and then they came true.
Does that stop those books being fiction?
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
noob. God said he would found a church, in the Ot and the NT... Also holy communion is prophecied in the OT and taught in the NT in corinthians.
this is why we go to church, to partake in it. And christ said you proclaim his death everytime you do this until he comes back.
The church is the bride of christ.
now as for praying, I have no clue what you are getting at.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Since when has math been 'fictitious'?
Originally posted by riley
I've read books where psychics have predicted things and then they came true.
Does that stop those books being fiction?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by riley
That's not what I asked. I asked how math made Physics books fictitious as the poster claims.
Secondly, I don't know if the OP used any math, his post was cut off by a moderator for length.
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
But some people run on pride, which means they are constantly built up on how good they are and run on self which blocks the ability to see Gods graces in a soul.
I never said religion makes you a good person, I believe God does through religion and through other means such as dilligence ect...
Now as for communion in the OT.
Malachias 1:11 prophecied the spreading of communion.
And as for men speaking to men. paul was a real apostle and worked many miracles. Christ also said (do this in memeory of me in all save one (I think) the gospels at the last supper.
Scientists have even tested eucharistic miracles In Italy and so forth which have proven to be real blood from over 1300 years old...
what i have felt communion do to my soul personally I cannot explain in this forum, it's unexplainable...
You are free to choose whatever you want to believe, just keep an open mind..
Originally posted by noobfun
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by riley
That's not what I asked. I asked how math made Physics books fictitious as the poster claims.
Secondly, I don't know if the OP used any math, his post was cut off by a moderator for length.
hahahahha do me a favour re-read the post ;-)
he said psychic's as in mental powery type people making predictions
not physics mentally type people making predictions of what will happen if they do something silly
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by OldThinker
Hey OT!
While I am not an atheist either, I think what Badge was getting at is that you are talking about atheists, yet the proof you offer in your post is about prophecies showing that Jesus was the Messiah. Even if it were true, it would not necessarily be 'Proof of God' to atheists. Be that as it may, while I have no problem believing that Jesus was the prophesied Messiah, your proofs are pretty weak:
As another poster pointed out earlier, everyone is a descendant of Eve. If you meant it in a way that Jesus had no human father, it still wouldn't make sense because Jesus was a descendant of Adam as well (through his mother?)
Also, how can Jesus be a 'Prophet like Moses' and at the same time be 'Son of God'? Speaking of which, I better ask you, since it is not always the same, depending on which Christian I ask: Is Jesus God as well as Son of God, or is he only the Son of God? Or is he neither, and the Father is greater than him?
Besides, personally, I don't see how Psalms can be taken as a prophecy for anything...it's just songs that apparently David wrote, inspired by God, or David asking for God's help, or saying something to God. He makes no mention of it being a prophecy, or talking about the future.
Anyhow...is it really honest to take every single mention of 'piercing', 'bread' 'wine' 'bones', etc. out of context and use it as a supposed prophecy of the Messiah? Also, it is worthy of noting that even if all the prophecies were real prophecies, the writers of the New Testament could have just combed over the Old Testament and made references to prophecies being fulfilled in their own books. And even if there are some prophecies that are not fulfilled, the Christians have a way out, saying that 'Jesus will do that in his second coming'.
Originally posted by GMoney1
Badge01 Interesting post, yet I seem to have gotten lost as to what the message is you are trying to convey. Please elaborate as to the relevance to this discussion? I will say that Old thinker has put forth a very lucid, and clear argument that at this point no professed Atheist has been able to effectively refute. Truth is able to stand on it's own, against all attacks. No matter how it's assailed, at the end of the day, it will eventually be vindicated.
Just as Jesus Christ himself was slandered and falsely accused. None of it was able to withstand the test of time, and the scrutiny of history. Old Thinker, I am interested in reading more...