It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Fyi, im 15. i dont have a car. i mearly have a bike with a flat tyre, and not a car. Also it was 1:00am you think i would go out in the streets at that time? anyway im going to go to the field tomorow.
Originally posted by stringue
Calling CG for the interesting light beam.
Evidence from 0:10 first video and 0:30 "explanation video",
The beam can't terminate at the bottom of the frame unless it is high elevation, image above shows it isn't (it was inside). As for second video, the wall outside looks really high, means a beam terminating at bottom of the frame had to be inside the wall (start worrying!)
Curious about lack of light bloom exhibited by beam compared to other illuminated objects, and consistency of instant beam light re ccd read process per frame. Also lack of ground illumination.
EDIT: 2nd video appears to show window frame at 0:27 compared to lack of diagonal objects in garden and supposed to be outside.
[edit on 10-9-2008 by stringue]
Originally posted by theknuckler
I myself, if I saw a UFO (which I haven't) I wouldn't go running towards it.