It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by percievedreality
reply to post by Blaine91555
Don't live in Alaska myself, if you go south...I'm in Oregon. Yeah I heard that rumor, it was pretty tasteless. Oh well, Obama is a muslim right?
IMO, we need an administration that is free to run the country and fix our problems. Unfortunately, Sarah has her own problems (as do many of us)...a new baby that is developmentally and probably also physically disabled. She should devote her time to those needs, not running the country while trying to also be the mother she needs to be (which she choose to do because she is anti-abortion). I know Obama has children but they are nearly grown up and not requiring special attention.
Originally posted by percievedreality
reply to post by Blaine91555
I also tend to think to myself that, if she can't control her daughter, what is to make me think she can control anything? Then I hear stories of grants to build on property that they didn't even own resulting in 7 years of litigation. That is mismanagement and I see enough of that at work and in politics already. Not change, for sure. I have a near teenage daughter, and no way in hell is she going to make that "mistake". Leaders are not supposed to make mistakes. Tknock Obama for his experience and then name her your VP (with even less experience) and be quoted as saying the day before, 'What is it exactly that the VP does all day anyway?" You have got to be kidding, it is so laughable, and such a hypocracy!
Originally posted by percievedreality
reply to post by Blaine91555
Don't live in Alaska myself, if you go south...I'm in Oregon. Yeah I heard that rumor, it was pretty tasteless. Oh well, Obama is a muslim right?
IMO, we need an administration that is free to run the country and fix our problems. Unfortunately, Sarah has her own problems (as do many of us)...a new baby that is developmentally and probably also physically disabled. She should devote her time to those needs, not running the country while trying to also be the mother she needs to be (which she choose to do because she is anti-abortion). I know Obama has children but they are nearly grown up and not requiring special attention.
I also tend to think to myself that, if she can't control her daughter, what is to make me think she can control anything? Then I hear stories of grants to build on property that they didn't even own resulting in 7 years of litigation. That is mismanagement and I see enough of that at work and in politics already. Not change, for sure. I have a near teenage daughter, and no way in hell is she going to make that "mistake". Leaders are not supposed to make mistakes. Tknock Obama for his experience and then name her your VP (with even less experience) and be quoted as saying the day before, 'What is it exactly that the VP does all day anyway?" You have got to be kidding, it is so laughable, and such a hypocracy!
Originally posted by dragonridr
So having kids is a bad thing? Or is it that woman are supposed to stay home in the kitchen taking care of babies? what are you trying to say exactly?
Originally posted by dragonridr
So i guess her daughter being 18 and can legally consent to do whatever she wants has no bearing on your decision then. The fact that she is getting married again do to that is of legal age thing again. This isnt the 1950s any more why dont ya catch up with the rest of us.Ive voted democrat in every election and Im beginning to think the democrats have lost touch with Americans. Reality Hillary should be facing Mccain she would have won. Now even me Im looking at Mccain going well i guess hes not that bad.
Originally posted by sputniksteve
Man that argument is sooo last week. We all know how she "should stay home like a good little women and take care of her children". It just never seems to amaze me when that comes out of the mouth of dems/libs when they were the ones fighting for womans rights. I bet there is a woman somewhere around you that would slap you for that comment.
Originally posted by sputniksteve
I was going to rebut the rest of your sorry attack on her family but it is not worth my time. Anyone with any intelligence would know everything in your statement is ridiculous. I like to see you control "your" kids. God knows my parents couldn't control me, and their parents couldn't control them. Who the hell wants to seriously control their kids anyway?
Originally posted by percievedreality
Originally posted by sputniksteve
Man that argument is sooo last week. We all know how she "should stay home like a good little women and take care of her children". It just never seems to amaze me when that comes out of the mouth of dems/libs when they were the ones fighting for womans rights. I bet there is a woman somewhere around you that would slap you for that comment.
As I said above in response to another, "Oh, that is so sexist" comment, I never said anything about women in my previous post, you are trying to steer this into sexism, which is not. If McCain had just fathered a baby that will require special attention (thus taking him away from his duties as POTUS), I would expect him to do the same as I argue for Palin. Mother or father, they both now have a comittment. A comittment that is too much for who I want to be POTUS.
Originally posted by sputniksteve
I was going to rebut the rest of your sorry attack on her family but it is not worth my time. Anyone with any intelligence would know everything in your statement is ridiculous. I like to see you control "your" kids. God knows my parents couldn't control me, and their parents couldn't control them. Who the hell wants to seriously control their kids anyway?
People who demand respect and have come to realize that SOME disipline is a good thing, that is who. I can see that you have no respect for anyone, thanks to your upbringing. Too bad, that the majority think that that is okay. No wonder you would support a man who divorces his crippled wife, lies about it and then marries his new woman for money not love. Conservative? Evangelical? Family values matter so much? NO... the definition of a hypocrite!!!