"The President or “leader” in 2005 tried desperately to hold the country together, but many of their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power base."
He doesn't say anywhere that the president in 2009 will DEFINIATELY be a woman. He's merely covering bases.
As much as I would absolutely LOVE to believe in Titor and his claims, I can't bring myself to accept it, because I'm too skeptical I guess.
Also, I'm sure there are many threads about this already.
Use the search facility


