It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The United States remains "dangerously vulnerable" to chemical, biological and nuclear attacks seven years after 9/11, a forthcoming independent study concludes. And a House Democrats' report says the Bush administration has missed one opportunity after another to improve the nation's security.
The recent political rupture between Russia and the U.S. only makes matters worse, said Lee Hamilton, the former Indiana Democratic congressman who helped lead the 9/11 Commission and now chairs the independent group's latest study.
Efforts to reduce access to nuclear technology and bomb-making materials have slowed, thousands of U.S. chemical plants remain unprotected, and the U.S. government continues to oppose strengthening an international treaty to prevent bioterrorism, according to the report produced by the bipartisan Partnership for a Secure America.
"The threat of a new, major terrorist attack on the United States is still very real," concludes the report to be released Wednesday, the same day a congressional commission will hold a hearing in New York on nuclear and biological terrorism threats.
"A nuclear, chemical or biological weapon in the hands of terrorists remains the single greatest threat to our nation. While progress has been made in securing these weapons and materials, we are still dangerously vulnerable," the report said.
"The Bush administration has not delivered on a myriad of critical homeland and national security mandates," the Democrats' report states. That report was being released Tuesday.
"The administration has just failed to act in so many ways," said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. "Let's say that we've been fortunate that we have not been attacked" since 2001, said Thompson, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.
Originally posted by Tentickles
Just imagine if I had tampered with any of the equipment I walked past or even the extreme of having a bomb of some sort on my person.
Gives you something to ponder...
In fact, why advertise to the world that there are such glaring vulnerabilities
Originally posted by Karlhungis
Forgive me, but my feeble CT mind gets a tad nervous when reports like this are put out.
I notice that we are 2 days away from 9/11.
I notice that the government just bailed out Fannie and Freddie. Which is at least in my mind, a bit too close to the missing trillions that Rumsfeld reported before 9/11.
There are a few other parallels, but honestly... it is a little unnerving. I will be happy when this year and the election are over.
Originally posted by VIKINGANT
One would think that a 'war on terror' would include protection of your own recources. It seems that Pres Bush's idea consisted of nothing but invading other countries with no apparent end goal except domination.
If he is not unpopular enough already, wait till the US citizens realise he has left them even more vulnerable than ever.
Originally posted by CaptainCaveMan
You gotta be kidding me right?Still vulnerable?
You can even walk/drive 2 miles down the road without someone checking you for something.
Its bordering along the lines of full cavity searches every hour for every person.
I cant see how there is a vulnerability.
Originally posted by CaptainCaveMan
You gotta be kidding me right?Still vulnerable?
You can even walk/drive 2 miles down the road without someone checking you for something.
Its bordering along the lines of full cavity searches every hour for every person.
I cant see how there is a vulnerability.
The recent political rupture between Russia and the U.S. only makes matters worse, said Lee Hamilton, the former Indiana Democratic congressman who helped lead the 9/11 Commission and now chairs the independent group's latest study.