Dan Rather explains compromised, corporate, journalism , page 5

Pages: << 2 3 4 5 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 66 times

reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 12:44 AM by DMTeed

Don't be suprised if Dan Rather dies of a "heart attack" within a year.

He is one of the last "oldschool" outspoken individuals whistle blowing against the American Corporations...

reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 12:52 AM by NOTurTypical

reply to post by '___'eed

Oh, a fantasy system.

Gotcha.

You're forgetting one tiny variable writers didn't put into the script:

Human laziness.

[edit on 10-9-2008 by NOTurTypical]

reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 09:28 AM by Maxmars

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by '___'eed

....

You're forgetting one tiny variable writers didn't put into the script:
Human laziness.

How Anne Rand-eske.

It is amazing how we have evolved thus far, with the vast majority of mankind being lazy and self-centered.

I suppose we can only hope to survive if the beautiful elite save us from ourselves. Nes pa?

reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 10:29 AM by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by Maxmars

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by '___'eed

....

You're forgetting one tiny variable writers didn't put into the script:
Human laziness.

How Anne Rand-eske.

It is amazing how we have evolved thus far, with the vast majority of mankind being lazy and self-centered.

I suppose we can only hope to survive if the beautiful elite save us from ourselves. Nes pa?

1. Who is Anne Rand?

2. I never said "vast majority".

3. The Illuminati (elite) are the evil ones, they will "save" no one.

reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 10:57 AM by Maxmars

Anne Rand is considered by many to be a great author. (I am not one of those people).

One of her most famous works is entitled "Atlas Shrugged".

The story deals heavily with the premise that most people need to be led by the enlightened social elite. Without whose educated and lordly wisdom and knowledge, people descend into a socialistic quagmire of declining infrastructure and collapsing economies.

The heroine, is on a quest to find a shadowy figure 'John Galt' who represents a sort of socio-cultural messiah of wealth and virtue.

The premise is that people are fat dumb lazy and selfish and need to be led by the elite who are wise and deserve all the wealth and power lest it be misused by greedy people arising from the masses to claim power.

Many people - MANY - simply loved the anti-communist message it contains. I simply hate it because as always, the social wealth hoarding elite heroes are painted as beautiful, kind, wise, and good; and the only one's capable of producing beauty and anything of worth. While the rest of society is seedy, gluttonous, and driven to corrupt the social order for undeserved gain.

But that is strictly a personal opinion, you might be one of those who likes her writings.

((Sorry if the original post seemed aggressive! No offense intended.))

[edit on 10-9-2008 by Maxmars]

reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 11:57 AM by NOTurTypical

reply to post by Maxmars

Oh......

THAT's who Anne Rand was. I've heard of Atlas Shrugged before:

www.illuminati-news.com...

Now, as that refers to me, stating communism doesn't take into account "lazy" people is an observation of reality, NOT an endorsement of the elite.

None whatsoever.

reply posted on 13-9-2008 @ 12:17 PM by oceanaut1

reply to post by TaZCoN

Ask yourself why you can't watch a program on television without there being a dual Israeli/American troll as either the mediator or participant in the discussion?

The international bankster cartel always seem to inject one their 'own' in the discussion to ensure 'their' message is not impeded. If you haven't noticed this...then you really need to pay attention. Whether its MSNBC, CNN, FOX, CNBC, Bloomberg, etc. their ALWAYS seems to be a troll on the discussion panel.

This needs to stop asap if there is ever going to be honest journalism. Also, who do you think 'edits/approves' every broadcast out their before it airs on the tele? Jewish opinion in the media is ok though when they totally dominate the media as a whole you've got a serious problem and this only drives a deeper sense of distrust among the people as a whole and further divides Americans from Americans.

Innocent jews in America are the unexpected victims of this separatist idealogy of which prevails among the Zionist Likud sect so prevailant in the media today. If Jews want to be included and trusted in America the they need to CHECK the Zionist point of view. America is a country based on CHECKS AND BALANCES, we demand fair journalism from here forward.

If you don't want to be isolated in the world STOP isolating yourselves. The 'sheeple' are not as ignorant as some would like to believe. I once brought this up on the phone to a CNBC programming executive and their response was a snark "Well we have Dog Chapman the Bounty hunter" on today (hung up phone) in a smartass elitist tone that enraged myself and let me know how they chose to see 'others'. Is this not outrageous?

[edit on 9/13/2008 by oceanaut1]

reply posted on 13-9-2008 @ 04:15 PM by oceanaut1

Hey fellows, what happened here?

The following was pulled prior to broadcast.

Any ideas as to why?

www.informationclearinghouse.info...

Better copy, save and archive it while the site is still up and running eh?

Troll alert! Strategically placed agents within the NSA and the Mossad got YOUR back?

[edit on 9/13/2008 by oceanaut1]

[edit on 9/13/2008 by oceanaut1]

reply posted on 13-9-2008 @ 04:26 PM by Ian McLean

reply to post by oceanaut1

Well, okay, thanks for the link. That's 'old news', though, isn't it? Who hasn't heard of the Israeli 'art students'? But that news is from 2001; any update on what's happened since? If so, worthy of a new thread in my opinion. Just because a country is an 'international ally' doesn't mean they can pursue intelligence operations beyond the bounds of international agreements.

Also, back on topic: what does that have to do with Dan Rather? Do you have evidence (or even direct conjecture) of who might have been 'influencing' his ouster from NBC? Or, to be fair, who might be forcing him to evoke these 'left-wing' outbursts?

Pages: << 2 3 4 5 >> ^^TOP^^