I Can Prove/Disprove Time Travel, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 8-9-2008 @ 07:38 AM by ANoNyMiKE
I have an idear!

I think I have a way to prove or disprove time travel occurring within the next few hundred years, right now. Now, admittedly I was not sober when I came up with this, but that's beside the point I've never heard of anyone putting this forward as an idea, so at the very least, even if it's not realistic, it's an interesting concept to consider.

Ok, I put to you all an experiment in which we can all participate in.

Everyone who reads this thread (hopefully at least a few 100 people), stop and seriously give this proposition some thought, it will only work if you completely 100% intend to make it so.

I want you to all first convince yourself of one thing. That if a method of time travel is discovered within your lifetime, that you will, without any doubt what so ever, find a way to involve yourself with that technology so that you may come back in time and make contact with yourself in 2008. Now here's the second part.

Seeing as it's doubtful that a time travel device capable of sending back a human in time will be invented within our life times, you must also "promise yourself" that you will pass this proposition on to your children and have them also pass it on to their children, and so on and so on.

Tell them if it's their generation that it becomes possible, to then go back in time to meet their then long dead ancestor in 2008. I think it's safe to assume at first time travel would be highly restricted but as time past I'm sure more people would go. Even if it takes 10 generations, eventually someone should find it accessible.

In theory, if enough of us do this, one of our distant ancestors should pop up at one point or another to let us know we were correct and time travel is possible. If no one shows up, then either none of you kept your promise, or time travel is not possible.

I, AnoNyMiKE, swear to do whatever I can, to procure passage into the past to 2008, in order to inform myself that time travel is indeed possible. If time travel is not possible within my life time, I swear to pass this on to my children and ask of them to do the same with their children until it becomes possible.

Thoughts?


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 08:51 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by ANoNyMiKE



Dude, why not get them to go back to 2000 or 1990? That way you can prove time travel works at some point in human history 10 or 20 years ago?

As this has yet to have happened already (if you catch my drift) then i think the possibility of time travel is disproven.

On a side note, i once heard that Albert Einstein not only figured out how to time travel but actually built a machine capable of it. He then decided that the human race was not ready yet and traveled forward to give it to us later. Perhaps we are still not ready but this is more convincing to me than anything John Titor said!


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 04:43 PM by constantwonder
a few problems with your theory.... time travel back in time beyond the point when the machine was turned on is thus far mathematicaly/physicaly impossible.... another point made by another poster that said it would cause problems in the time line is also it seems nothing to worry about as it is now believed that time branches like a tree instead of flowing uni-directionaly like a river so if you do go back you arent actually acting in your own time line but another possible time line that you did not initially experience.... its a deep subject with lots of great physics and maths i suggest you do a lil research on it its rather enjoyable

video.google.com...

video.google.com...#

video.google.com...=time%20travel%20&emb=0&dur=3

the second and third videos are the best but watch all three to get a better picture from the real whackos to the serious physics.... ron mallet has the best theories imo hope you enjoy

and to the poster who says because we havent had visitors from the future it may disprove time travel but (there is always a but) all that really proves is if there are time travelers they arent interfearing directly or arent popping into our timeline from my time is like a tree example or and this is probably imo the most likely.... this is the first go round the future is out there waiting for us but we havent gotten there yet its weird to think about but lots of fun





[edit on 8-9-2008 by constantwonder]


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 06:58 PM by ANoNyMiKE
Originally posted by constantwonder
a few problems with your theory.... time travel back in time beyond the point when the machine was turned on is thus far mathematicaly/physicaly impossible.... another point made by another poster that said it would cause problems in the time line is also it seems nothing to worry about as it is now believed that time branches like a tree instead of flowing uni-directionaly like a river so if you do go back you arent actually acting in your own time line but another possible time line that you did not initially experience.... its a deep subject with lots of great physics and maths i suggest you do a lil research on it its rather enjoyable

video.google.com...

video.google.com...#

video.google.com...=time%20travel%20&emb=0&dur=3

the second and third videos are the best but watch all three to get a better picture from the real whackos to the serious physics.... ron mallet has the best theories imo hope you enjoy

and to the poster who says because we havent had visitors from the future it may disprove time travel but (there is always a but) all that really proves is if there are time travelers they arent interfearing directly or arent popping into our timeline from my time is like a tree example or and this is probably imo the most likely.... this is the first go round the future is out there waiting for us but we havent gotten there yet its weird to think about but lots of fun

[edit on 8-9-2008 by constantwonder]


Please, walk with me a moment outside your box, it's too cramped for the both of us

You got that from Mallett, no? His laser time machine contraption. Well yes, I understand his thinking, but that's still 2008 thinking. Who's to say in 200 years that his quaint experiment doesn't turn into someone's 8th grade science fair project? Or that in 500 years we won't have access to say a blackhole to really play with time? We can't even properly define time let alone say with certainty how it works today.



reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 07:42 PM by dragonridr
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to
post by ANoNyMiKE



On a side note, i once heard that Albert Einstein not only figured out how to time travel but actually built a machine capable of it. He then decided that the human race was not ready yet and traveled forward to give it to us later. Perhaps we are still not ready but this is more convincing to me than anything John Titor said!

Einstein was a mathematician not an inventor he had difficulties tying his own shoes he wouldn't be able to invent anything. He could come up with a theory but would never have been able to figure out how to do it.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 16 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 15 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags