German Chemist-LHC CERN-Disaster In Four Years , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 8-9-2008 @ 03:13 AM by TheAgentNineteen

German Chemist-LHC CERN-Disaster In Four Years


www.dailymail.co.uk
Professor Otto Rossler, a retired German chemist, said he feared the experiment may create a devastating quasar – a mass of energy fuelled by black holes – inside the Earth.

"Nothing will happen for at least four years," he said. "Then someone will spot a light ray coming out of the Indian Ocean during the night and no one will be able to explain it."
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.foxnews.com
www.technewsworld.com
www.washingtonpost.com

[edit on 9-8-2008 by TheAgentNineteen]

[edit on 9-8-2008 by TheAgentNineteen]


mod edit: title

[edit on 8-9-2008 by sanctum]


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 04:13 AM by ben420
reply to post by HatFoilTin



2012 sounds like such a fun year doesn't it?

It's got natural disasters, paradigm shifts, the apocalypse, the arrival of planet x, the NWO takeover, black holes swallowing up the earth, aliens invading earth, etc. Its got the whole deal.


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 12:59 PM by HEroX
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



If black holes don't emit Hawkingsradiation they would never disappear so their energy level would be ∞. This only possibly if they open connections to an ∞ amount of parallel universes or if the size of the universe is ∞. But then all blackholes would have ∞ energy, so all blackholes should be of equal size wich is ∞ ,but they aren't! Their energy is not ∞ and mini black holes would just disappear. So my conclusion Hawkingsradiation exists. You can't have a reaction without reaction products. And btw it's not even proven that black holes exist.

[edit on 8-9-2008 by HEroX]

[edit on 8-9-2008 by HEroX]


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 02:59 AM by BlasteR
reply to post by TheAgentNineteen



The problem is that we have no way of "manipulating" black holes other than creating them. And the black holes CERN could potentially create are so miniscule that they only last a tiny fraction of a second because of hawking radiaiton. But that all depends on whether or not Hawking radiation is even real (which we actually don't even know).

But there have been other "atom smashers" built over the last decade or two that also got people all freaked out about the apocalypse. Nothing ever happened..

Hawking radiation is just a theory but it isn't just a well-regarded theory for no reason. It seems to expain alot..Scientifically I mean..

Think about it.... If black holes did nothing but grow exponentially in size at an exponential rate of growth, the universe would NOT exist. The universe would have been consumed by super-huge, unimaginably fast-growing black holes billions of years ago. As long as there have been massive stars there have been black holes.. The rate of expansion of the universe would NEVER have been able to outrun the exponential growth-rate of black holes and ever-increasing number of those black holes that exist in the universe. Because if they only get bigger, then they only get bigger faster. They would never die, and all the universe would have to look forward to is more and more black holes encroaching on its territory.. They would exist indefinately until they finally destroyed our universe altogether.

Having a quasar in your backyard isn't exactly my idea of a good time.. But this entire concept that black holes somehow have the ability to grow exponentially doesn't make sense.. If people are willing to believe THIS as theory, then why are they so willing to throw out the theory of Hawking radiation when the scientists themselves probably have a better grasp on this than most of us anyway?

-ChriS

[edit on 9-9-2008 by BlasteR]


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 03:03 AM by Loki
reply to post by HEroX



You're exactly right, if we are correct, then the CERN collider cannot create a black hole as it would violate the law of conservation of mass.

Although, if you are wrong, then the possibility exists, however, to create such a superdense object would result in nothing more than a singularity, a black hole so minute that it exists at a single point for a single instant, especially if Hawkings Radiation does exist.

That last part sort of just came out but sounded alright. Any scientists call foul on that?

[edit on 9-9-2008 by Loki]

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 113 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 92 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 10 hours ago, 63 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 54 replies