Originally posted by Math(s)ew
and by the way why the hell they use mosaic technique to MAKE a pic of the whole Moon? 
So you can make a bigger better quality picture...
LIKE THIS ONE Made with 107 tiles
BTW Clementine is NOT NASA its DoD/NAVY
and once again by the way ,there's even a clear (for me)picture of the sphinx in Copernicus
That would be THIS one
|
reply to post by imothop35
The photo: i141.photobucket.com... shows natural formations and the so-called "spaceship" is just a
high-albedo (whitish, highly reflective) rolling hill with visible small craters on it's surface. Someone got creative and made a mountain out of a
molehill.
This is for the gullible.
There's nothing here, folks, move on.
|
Originally posted by imothop35
Again it was ArMaP who finds a great Picture from this so called Spaceship
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Judged for yourself.
The photo found at i141.photobucket.com... shows a normal, natural feature complete with craters. It is a
rolling hill-type with high albedo due to it's whitish surface.
Some with too much time on their hands and great computer skills decided to have some fun with the gullible set. I never accepted it as real and now
seeing the area in the above photo proves that it is a hoax.
|
i guess you can spinn it either way ,
either we are seeing photos of the 3d mock ups (which are censored)
or
we are seeing the real photos that they took of the moon ,
you be the judge ,
but keeping in mind all the disclosure videos with nasa airbrush artist and egyptian airplan pilotes and who not,
either they are distorting facts and just talking about our technology,
or they are actuly speaking about real things that are not from this terra firma
|
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
I thought I recognized the style. That video was made by the same folks who made my $25 bill. Just as good but unspendable just as the video is a
joke!
|
Originally posted by Learhoag I never accepted it as real and now seeing the area in the above photo proves that it is a hoax.
Proves nothing of the sort... All it proves is ArMaP found a different photo of the area that shows' fuzzy rock' No proof that HIS find isn't the
altered one.
IF there really WAS a 'ship' there, it makes sense NASA would create a new image... one that 'clearly' showed it was a trick of lights and shadow
BTW compliments on your 'intelligent' choice of handle... You will go far here...
{{{bleepin sockpuppets  }}}
|
I found something intriguing:
on the right from the not complete hexagonal pattern we have two hexagonal craters (one of them is inside another smaller hexagonal pattern) and in
the center of them the supposed material left by the supposed meteors is casting shadows that are VERY VERY interesting!
[edit on 10-9-2008 by Math(s)ew]
[edit on 10-9-2008 by Math(s)ew]
[edit on 10-9-2008 by Math(s)ew]
[edit on 10-9-2008 by Math(s)ew]
|
Well, this was discussed looong time ago on this forum. The whole story about the Apollo 20 mission could be a fake, could not be, don't know. But
the real deal is that we have the original still from NASA showing the object over that crater.
Original thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Still from NASA:
www.lpi.usra.edu...
But... oh, wait a minute... what happened to the last link? Suddenly, is no more! 
If anybody can find the original still, please post it.
PD: About the Apollo 20 stuff... anybody was able to discredit the footage showing the flyover previous the zoom over the "spaceship"? Because I did
a frame by frame follow and compared it with photos from NASA and it was a "perfect" match. So... is that an "Apollo 20" flyover or something
else, like another previous and known Apollo mission? THAT is the real key to discredit all this about the "Rutledge" chronicle.
[edit on 13-9-2008 by JackHill]
|
