Originally posted by Azrael75
It has a great deal of relevance since this is a position requiring far too much time and dedication to also be a fit mother of a special needs
infant. Ask Dick Cheney how much time he had to be a good father to his infant children in the last 8 years? And if you think the VP does nothing more
than sign some papers and answer a phone, then no wonder you would then also stick up for the motherly values of a mom who refused to teach her
daughter sex ed, you know the pregnant underaged unwed daughter. These things do speak heavily to this particular position. It is amazing how
republicans have already relegated the position of VP to someone of no importance whatsoever after letting expressing what a great asset Cheney has
been all this time for all he has done.
Oh give me a break dude. You want to ramble about infants needing special needs, well guess what, there are millions of moms out there that have to
work and also take care of their families including children with special needs. And many of these working mothers with special needs infants have
help from specialized programs and in-home care assistants.
Many people these days "multi-task"...are you saying that candidates for P or VP should not have any external life at all if they are going to serve
in public office or be some perfect person that they should have God like traits to have absolutely no human faults?
2nd. Teaching sex ed to a 17 yr old is like trying to teach them how to ride a trycicle. They already know about it! Again, have you been living under
a rock for the last 20 or so years? Sex ed is taught to grades as low as 6th. Now do you really think sex ed makes any significant alteration to pre
teen and teen sexual explorations and curiosity? If anything, it ADDS to their desires to "find out about it". No amount of sex ed is going to
prevent human nature and behavior, especially at those puberty ages up to young adult ages.
3rd. Why dont you enlighten us all on when your first sexual encounter age was before spouting the "im so perfect and my values are too" garbage and
judging others who are just as human as the rest of us!
4th. The fact that her daughter and her fiancee are going to marry, and the fact that the guy is standing up to his responsibility and going to be a
father, and a husband..says a hell of alot for their up bringing and character, including her mother, than what your giving credit for. Again, do some
homework and see the ratio these days of how many young parents choose to do the right thing vs how many do not. You will be amazed.
Oh, btw, her daughter is not running for VP, neither is her special need infant. She has managed to govern Alaska along with taking care of her family
and does a top notch job at both. I seriously doubt that her special need infant's care or attention will be changed in any way if she became VP. If
anything, it probably will be better.
Again all of this has absolutely no relevancy to her ability to be a VP.
I am sure all of this would not even be an issue if the VP candidate was male and had a son who was going to marry a 17 yr old pregnant fiancee.
This topic is nothing more than election tabloid page filler and is IMO, best left at the check out counter.
Cheers!!!