Palin and Secret Lover, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 05:16 AM by mopusvindictus
reply to post by pavil



hey not a nick pic, that was some good info... I seriously thought the VP lived in the white house too!

Glad that info is online for every freak in the world to see

Jk

But seriously ty for the information


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 05:22 AM by Azrael75
reply to post by mopusvindictus



It was extremely helpful as apparently many of us suffered from such ignorance.
Also, it pointed out that the argument that living in the white house with its staff would make this all so seamless a completely empty, baseless, and just plain "i hope this is what the truth ends up being" kind of argument.

Thanks!!!!



reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 05:39 AM by mopusvindictus
reply to post by Azrael75



Because the point of white house vs very huge house makes a difference?

Your only point is a woman can't be a Mother and a VP at the same time, she certainly can, and you have no genuine concern for the child.

and hey,

meet my new friend IGNORE your not worth even debating with, a Friend just reminded me in a u2u that whatever your opinion of Palins child is, I'm Not Retarded and wasting my time and only encouraging this nonsense by paying attention to you.

Just a reminder... Misogyny won't ever get you any dates bro.

Late


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 07:11 AM by RFBurns
Originally posted by Azrael75
It has a great deal of relevance since this is a position requiring far too much time and dedication to also be a fit mother of a special needs infant. Ask Dick Cheney how much time he had to be a good father to his infant children in the last 8 years? And if you think the VP does nothing more than sign some papers and answer a phone, then no wonder you would then also stick up for the motherly values of a mom who refused to teach her daughter sex ed, you know the pregnant underaged unwed daughter. These things do speak heavily to this particular position. It is amazing how republicans have already relegated the position of VP to someone of no importance whatsoever after letting expressing what a great asset Cheney has been all this time for all he has done.


Oh give me a break dude. You want to ramble about infants needing special needs, well guess what, there are millions of moms out there that have to work and also take care of their families including children with special needs. And many of these working mothers with special needs infants have help from specialized programs and in-home care assistants.

Many people these days "multi-task"...are you saying that candidates for P or VP should not have any external life at all if they are going to serve in public office or be some perfect person that they should have God like traits to have absolutely no human faults?

2nd. Teaching sex ed to a 17 yr old is like trying to teach them how to ride a trycicle. They already know about it! Again, have you been living under a rock for the last 20 or so years? Sex ed is taught to grades as low as 6th. Now do you really think sex ed makes any significant alteration to pre teen and teen sexual explorations and curiosity? If anything, it ADDS to their desires to "find out about it". No amount of sex ed is going to prevent human nature and behavior, especially at those puberty ages up to young adult ages.

3rd. Why dont you enlighten us all on when your first sexual encounter age was before spouting the "im so perfect and my values are too" garbage and judging others who are just as human as the rest of us!

4th. The fact that her daughter and her fiancee are going to marry, and the fact that the guy is standing up to his responsibility and going to be a father, and a husband..says a hell of alot for their up bringing and character, including her mother, than what your giving credit for. Again, do some homework and see the ratio these days of how many young parents choose to do the right thing vs how many do not. You will be amazed.

Oh, btw, her daughter is not running for VP, neither is her special need infant. She has managed to govern Alaska along with taking care of her family and does a top notch job at both. I seriously doubt that her special need infant's care or attention will be changed in any way if she became VP. If anything, it probably will be better.

Again all of this has absolutely no relevancy to her ability to be a VP.

I am sure all of this would not even be an issue if the VP candidate was male and had a son who was going to marry a 17 yr old pregnant fiancee.

This topic is nothing more than election tabloid page filler and is IMO, best left at the check out counter.

Cheers!!!



reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 09:23 AM by Areal51
reply to post by pavil

There's a thread around here somewhere where someone predicted that Palin is supposed to be discarded as VP nom because of a scandal. McCain would then nominate his real choice in the midst of the spectacle caused by Palin's scandal. Supposedly this is all planned out by the powers that be.

The thread was made by one of ATS's more well known conspiracy theorists, however I don't recall the poster's name offhand. Maybe someone reading this thread knows what I'm referring to?



reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 11:44 AM by UnBreakable
reply to post by Syntaxstealth



I have no problem if indeed she had an affair, it's her life. What I do have a problem with is the incessant hypocracy of these politicians touting their 'family values' platform to everyone else. With her unsuccessful implementation of her 'abstainance, not education' stance with her pregnant, unwed 17 year daughter this would just be icing on the cake. If she can't control her own kid, how would she do against Putin if called on?It's the 'do as I say, not as I do' mentality of these people which turn me off politics completely,


reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 11:50 AM by pavil
Originally posted by Areal51
reply to
post by pavil

There's a thread around here somewhere where someone predicted that Palin is supposed to be discarded as VP nom because of a scandal. McCain would then nominate his real choice in the midst of the spectacle caused by Palin's scandal. Supposedly this is all planned out by the powers that be.

The thread was made by one of ATS's more well known conspiracy theorists, however I don't recall the poster's name offhand. Maybe someone reading this thread knows what I'm referring to?



I'm willing to read it, but from the cliff notes you provide it sounds like political suicide by McCain to knowingly do such a silly thing. Any bounce he would get from Palin would be totally erased by the Scandal and his poor decision making process. Makes for a good novel I bet.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 10 days ago with 59 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags
White House pressure on Gulf oil leak figures
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags