It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to psychiatric expert Russell Barkley, the New Age movement has yet to produce empirical evidence of the existence of Indigo children and the 17 traits most commonly attributed to them were so vague they could describe "most of the people most of the time"
Originally posted by skyblueff0
However, I think the are misconceptions with this Indigo "movement" is the fact that many think they have to be born into it. The fact is anyone can become an "Indigo" or to be more specific, anyone's aura can dominantly glow indigo.
Even so what color your aura depends greatly on your holistic health, the color is only temporary, just think auras as the giant mood ring. So yeah your aura can be dominantly indigo one day and then red the next.
Not only that, but people are always "psychic" in their own varying levels, despite not having Indigo dominant auras.
Anyways, I hope this helps people. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't want to misinform anyone, this is after all my opinion, one of many opinions.
[edit on 7-9-2008 by skyblueff0]
Originally posted by Still_Learning
reply to post by pretty_vacant
Hey man, I'm not dissing anything
I'm just saying that inigo kids have been around for much longer than the hype has, and that Indigo child means someone who has an indigo aura. And I'm not saying indigo kids are spoilled, just the charactoristics that were givin for them are snobbish
but if u think differently than enlighten me. What is it really like?