DEVELOPING: RNC Detainee alleges torture in Ramsey County jail, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 09:55 AM by dariousg
reply to post by sp00n1



Hmmm, I didn't watch the first video because I have no sound so I don't know what the kids are claiming. However, the second video didn't really need any sound to distract from what was going on. What was I supposed to see?

The first person being arrested did something after they had passed the camera that caught the bike cops attention. You could see this clearly. One of the cops pointed downward because he either saw some kind of contraband or the biker did something. That is when they moved around him to pull him down.

For any of you who think this is a crime perpetuated by the cops and want to slam anyone who objects by saying that they are asleep you must first realize my normal stance on these videos. I have seen many atrocities done by supposed 'peace' officers that I am absolutely against. Even if there are mitigating circumstances that lead up to the brutal actions. This person was not violently taken down off of his bike. He was not kicked, tased, or mauled by more cops than necessary. He was cuffed (strapped) and then placed into the car for transport.

To be honest, it looked like a legit arrest (one of the few I have seen online probably because people don't want to post the legit ones, just the ones that are controversial). I have read many of the posts and even replied to the definition of a chemical weapon post. But I have yet to see anything that explains how the arrest was so terrible.

As for the person that called out the flag being backwards, yes, I believe one of the bike cops pointed it out. Pretty hilarious actually.

Police brutality? Nope. Didn't see it.


reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 10:01 AM by dariousg
Originally posted by SectionEight
reply to
post by projectvxn



That "kid" sure did find out about the Justice part and I bet he is sorry he gave up his liberty so foolishly by acting like a street terrorist.


First off, let's please drop this STREET TERRORIST BULLS*** now. That is a neocon extreme conservative term that will only further degrade our freedoms in this country. It is a cop out to simply lable anyone a terrorist. That means, by definition as depicted in the Patriot Act, this kid, as you call him a "street terrorist" could be taken to a foreign land to be held without trial for an indefinite period of time simply because you have labeled him a terrorist.

What you are doing my friend is showing the shallowness that is your view on the right of people to protest.

If he intentionally bumped into a cop to try and knock him off then he is a criminal. Not a terrorist. That is such a pathetic point of view to take on this that I can't seem to stress it enough. HE IS NOT A TERRORIST.




reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 06:00 PM by NorthWolfe CND
reply to post by sp00n1



Poor brainless thing.
What else should he do to become even less credible?



reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 08:09 PM by forliberty09
reply to post by sp00n1



The U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. John B. Burke (April 2008 conference, cert. denied) upheld a 1st Circuit decision upholding the use of tactics defined as torture under U.S. treaty commitments against American citizens on U.S. soil (including hooded interrogations in restraint chairs, detention naked in a strip cell for days, threats/humiliations by guards, episodic deprivations of food, and other techniques, sham "sentences," detention in a super-max department disciplinary unit, etc.) against PRE-TRIAL detainees in Federal custody. Restraint chairs, four-point torture techniques, deliberate starvation, and other tactics are now COMMON PRACTICE in super-max facilities. The Feds are also now deliberately starving prisoners with low calorie diets in selected facilities in order to reduce their will to resist and "act up." The bottom line is that what has been happening in this country is that conduct by prison staff commonly used against convicted prisoners in disciplinary units (serving "sentences within sentences" after due process) are now being applied - en masse - to unconvicted detainees (nullifying the U.S. 5th Amendment).

Here's the rub...Most of America can read headlines about how the Administration has claimed it can commit torture (a criminal act under assault/Hobbs Act statutes/even terrorism statutes when directed against a person - WHO IS NOT SENTENCED - for group or political reasons). What many need to wake up to is that the 1st Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court this year have thrown their lot in with the terror state agenda. The prison system is now utterly lawless. The "bright line" around the prison systems had long meant no rights for CONVICTED prisoners. The terror state apparatus has now asserted the claim that non-convicted detainees can be subjected to conduct by prison officials that not only is unconstitutional, but (read up on recent U.S. Supreme Court cases nullifying state laws) in violation of state laws and Federal codes (now routinely violated based on wanton conduct reflecting mere expediency of the executive branch). That is, recent executive branch decrees and Federal court decisions allow prosecutors and prison staff to committ terroristic criminal acts - so long as it is done under "color of official right" (and mainly behind the walls of a prison/detention facility). Recent 4th Amendment cases show the assertion of lawlessness by the state terror apparatus is being extended to the streets - but that is another topic. Bottom line: it's over...They've done it... The 1st Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court have weighed in...The 5th Amendment is null. The entire United States has been reduced to a super-max disciplinary unit.










[edit on 8-9-2008 by forliberty09]

[edit on 8-9-2008 by forliberty09]

[edit on 8-9-2008 by forliberty09]


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 04:17 AM by candyfloss
reply to post by justme2



Well,the neo-con gestapo'ers have one big problem.History has taught us that those who collude with the oppressors have a limited usefulness and sooner or later will be looking down the barrel of a gun like the rest of the proletariat.Example-zonnderkommando inthe death camps inWW2.Better to get strong ,be brave and face up to reality.A state based on fear and violence to control the people is basicaly weak as it does not have support of the people(remember when you were all taught to be good patriots,to love the flag and America-you were united then).



reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 09:54 AM by tyranny22
reply to post by candyfloss



Why does everyone feel the need to establish a political party link to EVERY SINGLE THING posted on ATS?!!

Those in control of our government - and in turn, our political system/parties - have done a great job of convincing feeble minded people that there is a major difference in party affiliation. There is minimal difference at an ideal level. Practically no difference in governing policy.

Get over yourselves ... Democrat ... liberal ... Republican ... conservative. Our problems don't rest within a political affiliation.

With the current state of our militarism and Fascist mentality ... do you think it'd be any different if a Democrat were in office? If so, think again.

The Police State is here to stay if ignorant people continue to bicker over who's left and who's right. It's not the left or right that's wrong with the country .. it's the division of our most valuable assets ... the citizens of our country.

Am I the only person who's heard the term "Divide and Conquer?" I'm afraid Average Joe has fell for the propaganda hook, line and sinker. And the people that run the show don't seem to be reeling you in ... they just let you fight at the end of their line.

[edit on 9-9-2008 by tyranny22]


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 01:11 PM by candyfloss
reply to post by tyranny22



Thank you for your reply but I don't quite understand your message as regards myself.I understand generally what you are saying but I was'nt putting any political veiwpoint,I was just picking up on Just me2 's point about it's the neocons that are the naysayers in this case .That may be true or not be the case.But I think what ever your political persuasion ,it must be obvious that this case was an abuse of power and human rights.


reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 01:21 PM by tyranny22
reply to post by candyfloss



Sorry, my entire response wasn't directed entirely at you. I only referenced your post because of the first sentence:

Originally posted by candyfloss
Well,the neo-con gestapo'ers have one big problem.


As for the rest of your post; I agree with you.

My post was directed at the general population of ATS that continues to throw around left/right rhetoric endlessly baiting users and antagonizing political argument. It's the same reason I changed my signature to what it now reads below.

[edit on 9-9-2008 by tyranny22]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 190 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 82 replies