The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Who says they don't? It just so happens they are counterbalanced by the equally angry right. To say one fringe is anymore guilty than the other fringe would be to deny the reality of the situation.
Keeping the exchanges civil would go a long way towards negating both fringes anger. We can do this if we truely want to.
Do we?
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
[edit on 9/6/2008 by seagull]




