It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Of course, scholars can debunk this or have debunked these finds as they please, after all, they have the best weapon: the media with their "official version".
Originally posted by Hanslune
Howdy thegreyone
Of course, scholars can debunk this or have debunked these finds as they please, after all, they have the best weapon: the media with their "official version".
No actually science has two much better weapons than the mythical "control of the MSM". They have facts and the scientific method. The fringe has misstatement and belief.
The media tends to promote fringe materials much, much more than actual science.
Oh could you tell us thegreyone were you think the "official version" comes from? For example I want to know the "official version" of or about x where do I get it from? Where ever that is how do I know that is the "offical version"?
How is the officilal version changed? Over the last 150 years the view of the world, especially archaeology has changed - how did this change occur?
[edit on 7/9/08 by Hanslune]
I tell you how the official version goes. 99% of scientific facts are actually theories waiting to be disproved.
What does the scholars do? When a person comes with a new idea, that person is met with ridicule only for that person's idea to be accepted 50 years later.
How do scientist change their minds?: when their own method is used against themselves and the person using the method is long dead.
How many artifacts, monuments, ancient maps and suppressed info (unofficial archeologist found) have to be unearth until the scholars in power use their energy, together with new ideas, to find out where we really come from and what we are?
Do you really think that scientist KNOW how old planet earth is or the universe for that matter?
Everything is observation and theories but they teach you in school this observations are real facts!!
I mean, how long did it take Pluto not to be a planet?
Carbon dating is not accurate,
which makes earth probably 2 mil years old, and the dinosaurs could have lived just 1 mil years ago.
But they don't teach you this at school.
the official version is what they say it is:
the pyramids are tombs created by hunters and gatherers;
any reference to UFOs and aliens in ancient history are just myths;
the Mayan were good sky observers with a very good power for calculation;
Evolution is a fact besides the inability to find the missing LINKS;
If you believe in UFOs you are a wacko, just like you are a wacko if you believe in ghosts, ancient high civilization and anything not aligned with the norms.
What's the difference between the Inquisition and the nowadays scholars? well, at least the Inquisition killed you literally and you didn't have to worry about anything else. Now, they only kill your character through ridicule and opposition and you stay alive unable to do nothing even when you know that you are right.
Why do we have to have ONE official version for humanity, when the official version doesn't hold up to all the facts?
The day that the Internet is controlled 100% and you can read books no more (just like in 1984) and you only have to accept one version, that would be the day that I would have to say bye bye!
Dubbed Eva de Naharon, or Eve of Naharon, the female skeleton has been dated at 13,600 years old.
The polar ice caps melted dramatically 8,000 to 9,000 years ago, causing sea levels to rise hundreds of feet and submerging the burial grounds of the skeletons. Stalactites and stalagmites then grew around the remains, preventing them from being washed out to sea....
Originally posted by Stari
reply to post by Cuauhtemoc
Does anyone know how these are formed? Can they be formed under these conditions?
Star
[edit on 9/7/2008 by Stari]