Howdy TGO
I tell you how the official version goes. 99% of scientific facts are actually theories waiting to be disproved.
Hans: Yep science discards those theories that are disproved. How many fringe theories have you seen discarded?
What does the scholars do? When a person comes with a new idea, that person is met with ridicule only for that person's idea to be accepted 50 years
later.
Hans: You seem to be presenting a distorted version of the acceptance of tectonic plates-the delay was caused by the lack of supporting data, once the
data came in, ocean bottom drill core and the finding of the subduction zones etc. The theory needed facts to confirm it. Many new theories don’t
take that long. There was a theory that the Norse got to NA. It was a theory for several hundred years. Once l’Anse aux Meadow was found the truth
of the sagas was acknowledge very quickly, less than a year or two I believe
How do scientist change their minds?: when their own method is used against themselves and the person using the method is long dead.
Hans: Hmmm no they look at the facts and make changes based on those – dissent and discussion is rampant however which is why I find your belief in
an “official version” so funny.
How many artifacts, monuments, ancient maps and suppressed info (unofficial archeologist found) have to be unearth until the scholars in power use
their energy, together with new ideas, to find out where we really come from and what we are?
Hans: Which scholars are “in power”? I’m not aware of them. It would help if these finds were real and not hoaxes or misinterpretations.
Do you really think that scientist KNOW how old planet earth is or the universe for that matter?
Hans: Physics tells us that
Everything is observation and theories but they teach you in school this observations are real facts!!
Hans: Not the schools I went to
I mean, how long did it take Pluto not to be a planet?
Hans: Not sure I understand what you mean. Its been discussed a long time then changed at a convention. Your point is? That is a change of
nomenclature not a change in science
Carbon dating is not accurate,
Hans: It accurate especially when calibrated with tree rings
which makes earth probably 2 mil years old, and the dinosaurs could have lived just 1 mil years ago.
Hans: Not really, physics and geology give a very different reading and it doesn’t say 2 million
But they don't teach you this at school.
Hans: Tell them what? That the world is two million years old – why tell children falsehoods? Science can tell how the world is.
the official version is what they say it is:
Hans: Again WHO is they?
the pyramids are tombs created by hunters and gatherers;
Hans: Agriculturists who had hundreds of years of extensive irrigation practice on the Nile
any reference to UFOs and aliens in ancient history are just myths;
Hans: Without collaborative evidence why believe otherwise? One is left with a theory but no evidence.
the Mayan were good sky observers with a very good power for calculation;
Hans: yes your point was?
Evolution is a fact besides the inability to find the missing LINKS;
Hans: Ah the gods of the gap falsehood – what about what is known. How do you dismiss it? What theory do you have to explain the know evidence?
If you believe in UFOs you are a wacko, just like you are a wacko if you believe in ghosts, ancient high civilization and anything not aligned with
the norms.
Hans: Your word not mine, people who believe in such things have just that, belief, the facts are still not obtainable. Until then their beliefs
remain just that. Belief based theory.
What's the difference between the Inquisition and the nowadays scholars? well, at least the Inquisition killed you literally and you didn't have to
worry about anything else. Now, they only kill your character through ridicule and opposition and you stay alive unable to do nothing even when you
know that you are right.
Hans: Not that the fringe EVER attacks the orthodoxy… LOL. So no opposition is allowed eh?
Why do we have to have ONE official version for humanity, when the official version doesn't hold up to all the facts?
Hans: there isn’t an official version there are commonly agreed on facts. You’ll find a great deal of disagreement on lots of things. You will
also find constant change in those fields also. Again who puts out the “official version”? There is no such thing. I can assure you that education
in different countries is quite different. Muslim nations often teach history and science in different ways than the west.
The day that the Internet is controlled 100% and you can read books no more (just like in 1984) and you only have to accept one version, that would be
the day that I would have to say bye bye!
Hans: Well we can agree on that. The net is controlled in China and Cuba, interestingly enough science information is not controlled at all in those
countries. Odd isn’t it?
my reply was of the picture page only 
