I really miss John Lear, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 13-9-2008 @ 04:10 AM by silo13
reply to post by Gateway



Sometimes it’s good to be a newbie.
Meaning - I’ve heard this man talk. I’ve heard about him from here there and everywhere on the internet.
This is the firs time I’ve *seen* him.
From my background training (Kinesics) combined with my first impression of him?
Take a look at the video.
Watch his body language and reactions.

At tic 0:26:23 The interviewer begins to ask a question he (must) know is coming, concerning if he was or not ever recruited by MJ12.

He Freezes.

He licks his lips (as she's prefacing to ask him again if he's been recruited - “You‘ve seen them you must have met them“...)

Still frozen he licks his lips again.

She asks Directly now.

“I have to say I think they would have recruited you - am I wrong?”

Tic 0:26:34 ---> JL Shakes his head *NO* and markedly looks left.

*** Shaking the head no would indicate, yes, she is wrong. Simply, If I asks you, “Am I wrong” and you shake your head NO - what does that tell you)?***


Interviewer @ Tic 0:26:37

“You never got an offer?”

Again the marked look to the left again.

So, IMHO this man - when asked through nuance or directly, if he was ever recruited for MJ12 - either out and out lies, or is hiding something.

What's that mean?

I’ve no idea - that’s up to the rest of you who know him to say, but, in my opinion he’s lying.


reply posted on 13-9-2008 @ 05:15 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by Kukulcangod



Thanks for the link, Kulkulcan....but, I'm afraid I ill just lurk there.

Went to check it out, first thing I opened was the Apollo 11 'LEM' discussion....kinda wanted to wash my eyes out with soap, if ya know what I mean.....



reply posted on 17-9-2008 @ 10:31 PM by free-energy
I became a member when I heard John Lear rant a bit about abovetopsecret.com on Coast To Coast AM. When I first checked ATS out I was impressed enough to join.
It takes a while to learn all of the tools here.
I knew I was coming in while a big member was leaving. Besides, who doesn't the CIA watch?
I think the "skeptics" have gotten a little more polite in the past year, or at least held a little closer to proper decorum.
The constant "skeptic" baiting could turn anybody off.

The problem with being "Way Out There" is that the truth is that the universe is a very strange place indeed. It is such a strange place that a normal exercise in college is to state that a certain thing is true and then try to defend it. In these "brains-storming" sessions a lot of new ideas and some never before considered facts can come out.

I do not think that we can know what the multi-dimensional functions of space artifacts that we will continue to find are. It is entertaining to think about them. To state them as fact is a little bit much for many people. If we do not find out what these multi-dimensional aspects are we may never be able to operate them.
If our spirit is not right we will elect politicians that will lie to us in order to fatten their own retirement portfolio while the truth of the free energy we live inside of goes ignored and unloved.

I do not think that the owners of ATS want to suppress any bleeding edge topic that can be intelligently discussed. (Just my opinion). I do think many companies, agencies and maybe even alien races would like to suppress free speech and will send in the flying monkeys to get the job done.

I'm going to take another 8000% RDA dose of organic plant derived vitamin B-12 and wish John Lear and fellow passengers a fine trip around the dark side of the moon. Maybe even tonight in my astral dream, (daily dreams required by god).
Or maybe I need a Moon ticket. (Priceline or TicketMaster ?)


reply posted on 19-9-2008 @ 01:36 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by free-energy



I myself found his views very interesting, yet now I have switched over to Hoagland and Joseph P. Farrell. If you haven't checked out Farrell please do so. He has 2 great books out. Specially the SS Brotherhood of the Bell.


reply posted on 24-9-2010 @ 07:40 PM by warequalsmurder
Originally posted by TKainZero
John Lear was a good man.

With his own pasionate views...


The demsie of the Lear-ATS relationship was tragic...

And all it realy proves is that EVEN adults, can at like school children sometimes...

John Lear was an Icon on ATS, weather or not they want to admit to that anymore...

This place was a better place with him.



Right on.

And I don't give a crap what GOOLS says. I've read the fallout arguments that happened. It appeared to me that the MODs and the Owners in particular were way full of themselves. They were conniving behind the scenes and when things went south for them they banned him. Springer was the prime mover on this as a matter of fact.

Yes, perhaps they've reinstated his membership since then just to save face but the fact of the matter is, through their bungling behavior we've lost probably our best member ever here.

Mods and Owners don't like what I'm saying? To F-ing bad.

People have to remember here that when flame wars happen and the sharks come out to feast it becomes a very stressful situation, especially for the person who is at the focal point. I've been in more than my share of battles against the Trolls on other sites and I can attest first hand to my statement. And by the way, the worst ones I ever had were always against the self righteous MODs with their newly acquired God complexes.

I don't blame Lear a bit for staying away from that kind of stress.

I just wish there was some way we could convince him to come back but I doubt he ever will.

edit on 24-9-2010 by warequalsmurder because: .



reply posted on 25-9-2010 @ 11:26 AM by warequalsmurder
Originally posted by xpert11
Unless you can produce an unedited screen shot that proves this you are talking baloney.

Give it a rest Lear and others like him are not mature enough to be ATS members .



Right from John Lear's keypad:

John Lear:: You are being less than forthcoming here Springer.

So lets see here. Apparently my ban has been lifted.

On Monday morning January 28 Skeptic Overlord bans me for suspicion of fabricating Ritzmann and Biedny quotes.

When he finds out Monday evening that somebody lied and that it is not true he continues my ban, but not the others which was in effect until today.

Today I have supposedly 'voluntarily resigned' as conspiracy master.

Mind if I post all of your emails to me on Monday January 28 Skeptic Overlord?

Especially the one where you say in order for my ban to be lifted I have to agree with the others who were banned that the fiasco will never be known by the 'public forum'.

I never did agree to the cover-up so why am I now unbanned?

Thanks.

Source:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

This exact accusation is never refuted by ScepticOverlord. He only tries to indirectly calm the waters and cover his posterior. But the part about the connivery is never refuted as in: In order for the ban to be lifted you have to agree with the others.

There's some hot mustard for your baloney.

xpert11
Give it a rest Lear and others like him are not mature enough to be ATS members .


This is a unfounded opinion that only makes your accusation appear to be a self characterization on your own behalf.




edit on 25-9-2010 by warequalsmurder because: for clarification



reply posted on 25-9-2010 @ 06:34 PM by xpert11
reply to post by warequalsmurder



Since you are making the claim the burden of proof lies with you and if you were in the right you would be able to at produce an unedited screen shot . Yet all you can produce is an alleged transcript .

If Lear really was mature enough to be an ATS member wouldn't everyone stop posting as soon as they had a disagreement with those who run and own the boards ?

Cheers xpert11 .


reply posted on 25-9-2010 @ 07:56 PM by warequalsmurder
Originally posted by xpert11
reply to
post by warequalsmurder



Since you are making the claim the burden of proof lies with you and if you were in the right you would be able to at produce an unedited screen shot . Yet all you can produce is an alleged transcript .

Cheers xpert11 .


I gave you the proof provided from this exact site (the very site we are debating on, i.e. ATS) and the exact link to the exact post!

Whether or not you wish to look at this proof is up to you. It is entirely within your rights to try and bury your head in the sand if you wish. But everyone who looks at this debate will now know that you painted yourself into a corner and came out looking every bit the poor loser for refusing to look at the evidence.

This evidence (provided from the original debate on this very site) you choose to ignore, at the peril of your own credibility now.

Now the burden of owning up to your miscalculation as to my ability to back up my claims falls squarely on your own confused little shoulders.

And I'm quite content to allow the reader to decide who is full of horse manure at this juncture of our little skirmish.

Cheers
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



ONLY Read this if your were born in the 40\'s 50\'s or 60\'s
  Posted 9 days ago with 67 member flags
Video: Angry Dad Shoots Daughter\'s Laptop [Posts on Facebook]
  Posted 1 days ago with 39 member flags
Free Psychic Readings
  Posted 1 days ago with 28 member flags
ORIGINAL Elephant Painting Incredible
  Posted 11 days ago with 27 member flags
Come Troll With Me!
  Posted 15 days ago with 19 member flags
Kdog\'s Cave, The Man Cave
  Posted 13 days ago with 17 member flags
Draw a Stick Man
  Posted 14 days ago with 16 member flags