-Z-
The truth............., page 1
privacy
Topic started on 5-9-2008 @ 11:51 PM by kdial1
Has anyone read this website?
www.truthism.com...
This blew my mind!! You have to have a open mind to keep up with it.....I just spent about an hour reading.....
-Kdial1
www.truthism.com...
This blew my mind!! You have to have a open mind to keep up with it.....I just spent about an hour reading.....
-Kdial1
reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 04:23 AM by TruthParadox
reply to post by RFBurns
I don't believe that anyone is basing their opinion of this authors perspective based on his view on women. pretty_vacant said that she has read articles that are more thought out and complex, and I have to agree. I did find a lot of the information interesting, however. Mainly the pictures of UFOs in ancient times. As for me, I always try to find the motive of the author. Is it to genuinely inform people of knowledge which may be useful, or is it to satisfy one's own ego. With this author, I found it to be the latter. He, more than once, insults the reader's intelligence and calls us sheeple. He accuses people of forming their beliefs based on ego, and yet is a hypocrite of this himself, as he definitely has a bloated ego with no proof for his claims.
Oh yah, and he thinks the sun is cube shaped.
I don't believe that anyone is basing their opinion of this authors perspective based on his view on women. pretty_vacant said that she has read articles that are more thought out and complex, and I have to agree. I did find a lot of the information interesting, however. Mainly the pictures of UFOs in ancient times. As for me, I always try to find the motive of the author. Is it to genuinely inform people of knowledge which may be useful, or is it to satisfy one's own ego. With this author, I found it to be the latter. He, more than once, insults the reader's intelligence and calls us sheeple. He accuses people of forming their beliefs based on ego, and yet is a hypocrite of this himself, as he definitely has a bloated ego with no proof for his claims.
Oh yah, and he thinks the sun is cube shaped.
reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 07:52 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by pretty_vacant
I am a woman too and I must say, the author is very close to the truth, although he could have put it in a less offensive way . If you look closely, you notice that men are held back/controlled by their women. It's just a question of how you interpet the facts. You don't have to feel offended, because there are women, who are different. The author was just generalising to make his point. So think about it, before you start denying on a basis of being offended. The reason that "reality" seems to work in this manner, is no basis that it isn't programmed in our mind.
Ask yourself why women think they need make-up? Why do they want to look good? They do it for the men. If men then give them attention, they have control. Think about it. This is how women work. Men are just as silly. They seem to think they are more attracted to someone with paint on their face, while they have just been molded to think so.
About "that men cannot satisfy their sexual needs without also getting trapped in a relationship at the same time", ever think about why men need to run after their sexual needs so desperately? Because they are very receptive to manipulation on that basis. And if you've ever looked around, it's all over the place.. Half naked woman in advertising, video clips.. For god sake, women walking down the street almost dressed like prostitutes. But they call it fashion by the way. It's all linked together in a gigantic manipulation grid.
These were the most basic examples of how it all works. And if you just look and think about it long enough, you start to see it. It's not an illusion, it's really there, right under our noses, for all to see. But do you realize it?
My advice: Keep your mind and eyes open.
I am a woman too and I must say, the author is very close to the truth, although he could have put it in a less offensive way . If you look closely, you notice that men are held back/controlled by their women. It's just a question of how you interpet the facts. You don't have to feel offended, because there are women, who are different. The author was just generalising to make his point. So think about it, before you start denying on a basis of being offended. The reason that "reality" seems to work in this manner, is no basis that it isn't programmed in our mind.
Ask yourself why women think they need make-up? Why do they want to look good? They do it for the men. If men then give them attention, they have control. Think about it. This is how women work. Men are just as silly. They seem to think they are more attracted to someone with paint on their face, while they have just been molded to think so.
About "that men cannot satisfy their sexual needs without also getting trapped in a relationship at the same time", ever think about why men need to run after their sexual needs so desperately? Because they are very receptive to manipulation on that basis. And if you've ever looked around, it's all over the place.. Half naked woman in advertising, video clips.. For god sake, women walking down the street almost dressed like prostitutes. But they call it fashion by the way. It's all linked together in a gigantic manipulation grid.
These were the most basic examples of how it all works. And if you just look and think about it long enough, you start to see it. It's not an illusion, it's really there, right under our noses, for all to see. But do you realize it?
My advice: Keep your mind and eyes open.
reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 09:17 PM by pretty_vacant
reply to post by RFBurns
Did you read _anything_ of what I wrote in my former post??
LOOK at what I’m saying. I said that the mere fact that he thinks this certain way about women, IMO, scratches valuable credibility from the rest of his arguments – and that is my opinion from an objective and impersonal point of view. Anybody who was reading that article and did not see this, then they are the ones who are not considering the author’s angle and therefore are not gaining a full perspective of the entire purpose of the claims he is making.
Sure I was taken aback by the offensive things that he wrote about women, any woman speaking from an emotive standpoint would have this opinion in common, certainly.
But surely you can make sense of my unprejudiced perspective on this matter??
I did mention that I have a very broad mind when it comes to these subjects, to the extremes. I am open to the idea that the author is, in fact, speaking the truth. I am OPEN to that reality, but it is of my opinion that he is not worthy of such credibility and I have stated my reasons clearly. Not just because i “believe” a person of such a state of mind or opinion on certain “things” could produce as much trustworthiness within his arguments – he could be a friggin genius for all I know.
For it is not only the statements he made about women that have determined whether I should take his work seriously or not.
Like I said above, I didn’t only use one section of his entire webpage to establish my conclusions. The manner in which he presented his information and the language used also heavily led to me consider his arguments to be quite “brainless” in origin, as if he has just gathered pieces of other articles and decided to paste them together to form what he refers to and wholeheartedly believes to be the “Truth”. I’m not saying it’s “all BS” but I am certainly saying that the way in which he has presented these separate “facts” definitely points to that opinion.
I recognize that this may not be the case, for there are many ideals that he raised that I put stock in, perhaps even some of the more radical ones.
It is not a question of belief or non-belief because until these phenomena actually happen to us and we experience these events first hand, we simply and purely never know – and that is the utter and unavoidable truth. Meantime, open-mindedness and a broad opinion are favourable. Both of which I personally possess.
I did accordingly, thank you.
So before you think you know how my mind operates, think again. I consider all angles. I certainly do not have a one-sided perspective on things.
You received the completely wrong end of the stick in the entirety of everything I said in my first post, mate.
All the best then,
Vacant
reply to post by TruthParadox
Couldn’t have said it better myself TP
[edit on 8/9/08 by pretty_vacant]
Did you read _anything_ of what I wrote in my former post??
LOOK at what I’m saying. I said that the mere fact that he thinks this certain way about women, IMO, scratches valuable credibility from the rest of his arguments – and that is my opinion from an objective and impersonal point of view. Anybody who was reading that article and did not see this, then they are the ones who are not considering the author’s angle and therefore are not gaining a full perspective of the entire purpose of the claims he is making.
Sure I was taken aback by the offensive things that he wrote about women, any woman speaking from an emotive standpoint would have this opinion in common, certainly.
But surely you can make sense of my unprejudiced perspective on this matter??
Originally posted by RFBurns
Suppose he left out the rant over women...would anything else on that site be worthy of considering?
I did mention that I have a very broad mind when it comes to these subjects, to the extremes. I am open to the idea that the author is, in fact, speaking the truth. I am OPEN to that reality, but it is of my opinion that he is not worthy of such credibility and I have stated my reasons clearly. Not just because i “believe” a person of such a state of mind or opinion on certain “things” could produce as much trustworthiness within his arguments – he could be a friggin genius for all I know.
For it is not only the statements he made about women that have determined whether I should take his work seriously or not.
Using just one section of the entire content of the site to say its all BS is a narrow field of view, not to mention very little room for anything other than a narrow prospective on everything else.
Like I said above, I didn’t only use one section of his entire webpage to establish my conclusions. The manner in which he presented his information and the language used also heavily led to me consider his arguments to be quite “brainless” in origin, as if he has just gathered pieces of other articles and decided to paste them together to form what he refers to and wholeheartedly believes to be the “Truth”. I’m not saying it’s “all BS” but I am certainly saying that the way in which he has presented these separate “facts” definitely points to that opinion.
I recognize that this may not be the case, for there are many ideals that he raised that I put stock in, perhaps even some of the more radical ones.
It is not a question of belief or non-belief because until these phenomena actually happen to us and we experience these events first hand, we simply and purely never know – and that is the utter and unavoidable truth. Meantime, open-mindedness and a broad opinion are favourable. Both of which I personally possess.
OK so take a piece of paper and cover up the section that offends you. Read the rest. Then come back and give us a more wider angle of objectivity.
I did accordingly, thank you.
So before you think you know how my mind operates, think again. I consider all angles. I certainly do not have a one-sided perspective on things.
You received the completely wrong end of the stick in the entirety of everything I said in my first post, mate.
All the best then,
Vacant
reply to post by TruthParadox
Couldn’t have said it better myself TP
[edit on 8/9/08 by pretty_vacant]
reply posted on 8-9-2008 @ 10:52 PM by pretty_vacant
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
I'm sorry, our purpose is to enslave men via relationships?? We're all obssesed with relationships and love?? We don't care about anything else in life?? We _force_ men to waste their precious time and resources?? We are essentially babies with the emotional maturity of a 4-year-old?? We promote the enslavement of humanity?? Don't forget that we can be blamed for the downfall and utter hopelessness of humanity...
Sheesh!! When you said that he was generalising did you actually mean embellishing to the point of sheer and absolute nonsense??
This guy denotes that glorification of the male species! You don't see that??
Are you speaking for the entire male race here?? I doubt that all males are dominated or controlled by the leading female influences in their lives. I truly doubt that.
My advice: don't make excuses for the author. Has it or has it not been clarified in this thread already that this guy is one of chauvinistic and ignorant character??
You know, at first, when i glanced at what he wrote about women in the article, i thought the same; that he must be generalising. And then i went over it in more depth and i realised that he actually wasn't.
If YOU looked more closely you would clearly distinguish that the author conveys a very real hatred for the female gender. I am reading this section over again in an impartial fashion and the more i go over it, the more i am finding it ridiculous.
I'm going to include a copy here because it is just _totally_ relevant to the purpose of the article:
Do you REALISE that the author is trying to pass this off as THE TRUTH?? He is trying to make you believe that this utter BS is the truth!
Now that just #s me off to no end because this garbage couldn't be _further_ from the Truth.
Listen, we choose to live this way. WE do. In every moment we create. We create our reality with our intentions. You can choose to be "manipulated" by BS statements such as the ones put forward in this webpage. OR you can _choose_ otherwise. People don't want to own up to the responsibility of their actions and so they avoid it the best they can.
I did not, at any point in my analysis of the article, "deny on the basis of being offended". The entire time i have defended my objective point of view and i swear to that. At no point did i ever make any decisions based on pure emotional response. Any opinion that i came to was born out of careful thought and vindication and is entirely valid.
The point is that this guy's intentions have evidently soured. I f he is trying to pass the above passag off as the Truth, then i have to assume his other opinions are not entirely lucid either.
Vacant.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by pretty_vacant
I am a woman too and I must say, the author is very close to the truth, although he could have put it in a less offensive way.
I'm sorry, our purpose is to enslave men via relationships?? We're all obssesed with relationships and love?? We don't care about anything else in life?? We _force_ men to waste their precious time and resources?? We are essentially babies with the emotional maturity of a 4-year-old?? We promote the enslavement of humanity?? Don't forget that we can be blamed for the downfall and utter hopelessness of humanity...
Sheesh!! When you said that he was generalising did you actually mean embellishing to the point of sheer and absolute nonsense??
This guy denotes that glorification of the male species! You don't see that??
If you look closely, you notice that men are held back/controlled by their women. It's just a question of how you interpet the facts.
Are you speaking for the entire male race here?? I doubt that all males are dominated or controlled by the leading female influences in their lives. I truly doubt that.
You don't have to feel offended, because there are women, who are different. The author was just generalising to make his point.
My advice: don't make excuses for the author. Has it or has it not been clarified in this thread already that this guy is one of chauvinistic and ignorant character??
You know, at first, when i glanced at what he wrote about women in the article, i thought the same; that he must be generalising. And then i went over it in more depth and i realised that he actually wasn't.
If YOU looked more closely you would clearly distinguish that the author conveys a very real hatred for the female gender. I am reading this section over again in an impartial fashion and the more i go over it, the more i am finding it ridiculous.
I'm going to include a copy here because it is just _totally_ relevant to the purpose of the article:
Women are ultra-impressionable beings, and therefore are easily controlled by aliens and the elite. The main purpose of women on Earth (that is, what aliens have programmed them to do) is to enslave men via relationships. Women are obsessed with relationships and love (due to alien programming), and don't care about anything else in life. They would have men believe that being in a relationship is one of the most important things in existence, not realizing that men couldn't care less about being in a relationship--and rightfully so. Furthermore, women force men to waste their precious time and resources on them. This demonic charade (i.e., relationships) has gone on for far too long and obviously has no end in sight. Thus, you can blame women for the downfall and utter hopelessness of humanity.
Do you REALISE that the author is trying to pass this off as THE TRUTH?? He is trying to make you believe that this utter BS is the truth!
Now that just #s me off to no end because this garbage couldn't be _further_ from the Truth.
Listen, we choose to live this way. WE do. In every moment we create. We create our reality with our intentions. You can choose to be "manipulated" by BS statements such as the ones put forward in this webpage. OR you can _choose_ otherwise. People don't want to own up to the responsibility of their actions and so they avoid it the best they can.
So think about it, before you start denying on a basis of being offended.
I did not, at any point in my analysis of the article, "deny on the basis of being offended". The entire time i have defended my objective point of view and i swear to that. At no point did i ever make any decisions based on pure emotional response. Any opinion that i came to was born out of careful thought and vindication and is entirely valid.
The point is that this guy's intentions have evidently soured. I f he is trying to pass the above passag off as the Truth, then i have to assume his other opinions are not entirely lucid either.
Vacant.
reply posted on 9-9-2008 @ 03:40 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by pretty_vacant
They don't know that they are enslaving men. They feel the desire to fall in love. Their goal is to fall in love, marry, have kids... Do you see? If I would ask men how their life looks like when they are older, they most of the time don't say: I would be married and have 3 kids.
Precious time and resources. 'Love don't cost a thing' is a lie. (Most of the) women wants presents and aspects men have to pay diner when they go out.
And yes, women do have more emotions than men. Their feelings are strong. So indeed, compare to men, they look like 4year old kids.
How can you define it to nonsense, while you only see the woman-side of the story?
If I looked more closely then I would shake his hand.
I don't see hatred for the female gender. I see a part of how to look at the way he looks at
it. I understand what he means, without feeling offended. WOW!
I didn't choose for this way of living. Women look like clowns. Men are behaving like pigs and they made them this way, by the way they act. Couples that are going to marry and then, months later they divorse?! That's silly.
Yep, that's what he is talking about. So it is a case of denial?
Okay, I can also understand what you mean. I can't prove you otherwise because you have to see it for yourself. Ever heared about; 'Behind every great men, is a more greater woman' Where does that come from?
Keep thinking!
They don't know that they are enslaving men. They feel the desire to fall in love. Their goal is to fall in love, marry, have kids... Do you see? If I would ask men how their life looks like when they are older, they most of the time don't say: I would be married and have 3 kids.
Precious time and resources. 'Love don't cost a thing' is a lie. (Most of the) women wants presents and aspects men have to pay diner when they go out.
And yes, women do have more emotions than men. Their feelings are strong. So indeed, compare to men, they look like 4year old kids.
How can you define it to nonsense, while you only see the woman-side of the story?
I like the fact that you guys are given it your attention and discus about it, but I see only one side of the interpetation. So, it isn't clarified to me.
My advice: don't make excuses for the author. Has it or has it not been clarified in this thread already that this guy is one of chauvinistic and ignorant character??
If YOU looked more closely you would clearly distinguish that the author conveys a very real hatred for the female gender.
If I looked more closely then I would shake his hand.
I don't see hatred for the female gender. I see a part of how to look at the way he looks at
it. I understand what he means, without feeling offended. WOW!
Listen, we choose to live this way. WE do. In every moment we create. We create our reality with our intentions.
I didn't choose for this way of living. Women look like clowns. Men are behaving like pigs and they made them this way, by the way they act. Couples that are going to marry and then, months later they divorse?! That's silly.
People don't want to own up to the responsibility of their actions and so they avoid it the best they can.
Yep, that's what he is talking about. So it is a case of denial?
Okay, I can also understand what you mean. I can't prove you otherwise because you have to see it for yourself. Ever heared about; 'Behind every great men, is a more greater woman' Where does that come from?
Keep thinking!
Judge Has [not] Ruled, Obama [not] Off Of Ballot In Georgia! (erroneous news report)
Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
Posted 16 days ago with 64 member flags
Posted 16 days ago with 64 member flags
At a certain distance from Earth in space no living being can not survive ,even in a spaceship.
Posted 11 days ago with 20 member flags
Posted 11 days ago with 20 member flags
Here\'s an update on the "strange metal boxes washed up on Oregon beach"
Posted 0 days ago with 16 member flags
Posted 0 days ago with 16 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
US approves new nuclear power plants...first ones in 35 years
Other Current Events, Posted 24 minutes ago
Other Current Events, Posted 24 minutes ago
Ted Nugent on the 2nd amendment during a pbs interview.(He ask "Am I Wierd?")
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 35 minutes ago
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 35 minutes ago
Darby-ism, What is It, Who Started It, and Are Believers in It Doomed?
Religion, Faith, And Theology, Posted 40 minutes ago
Religion, Faith, And Theology, Posted 40 minutes ago
Why aren't students promised their lecturers aren't cheating?
Education and Media, Posted 1 hours ago
Education and Media, Posted 1 hours ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Nat Rothschild loses libel action against Daily Mail
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 24 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 24 flags
Video: Angry Dad Shoots Daughter's Laptop [Posts on Facebook]
Other Current Events, Posted 6 hours ago, 22 flags
Other Current Events, Posted 6 hours ago, 22 flags
Here's an update on the "strange metal boxes washed up on Oregon beach"
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 13 hours ago, 18 flags
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 13 hours ago, 18 flags
Be sure to NOTICE how Threatening they are to YOU!!! Warning Graphic Footage!
US Political Madness, Posted 7 hours ago, 12 flags
US Political Madness, Posted 7 hours ago, 12 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Video: Angry Dad Shoots Daughter's Laptop [Posts on Facebook]
Other Current Events, Posted 6 hours ago, 139 replies
Other Current Events, Posted 6 hours ago, 139 replies
Iran Says US Attack Would Be ‘Akin To Suicide’
Breaking Political News, Posted 14 hours ago, 132 replies
Breaking Political News, Posted 14 hours ago, 132 replies
Here's an update on the "strange metal boxes washed up on Oregon beach"
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 13 hours ago, 52 replies
ATS Skunk Works, Posted 13 hours ago, 52 replies
Be sure to NOTICE how Threatening they are to YOU!!! Warning Graphic Footage!
US Political Madness, Posted 7 hours ago, 38 replies
US Political Madness, Posted 7 hours ago, 38 replies
'Anonymous' hacker group threatens 'reign of terror' against Israel
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 31 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 31 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.279 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.279 seconds
