Oprah balks at having Palin on her show, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 06:34 AM by Venit
reply to post by sos37



They should probably have her on. If it was to be made a discussion show with Palin faced with a panel of academics/professors and general intellectuals, they should be able to demonstrate the fallacy of many of her policies to ordinary people. This would be a great opportunity for the democrats to demonstrate just what a bad thing a McCain/Palin government would be for Americans.


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 06:55 AM by Areal51
reply to post by Fathom

How many women has Oprah had on her show?

How many influential and powerful women have Oprah had on her show?

How many White people have Oprah had on her show?

How many White politicians has Oprah had on her show?

Really, you need to do better than you have done.






[edit on 6-9-2008 by Areal51]



reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 09:07 AM by Nivek Serca
reply to post by Dronetek



When I did see that Intrepid was a canadian and I looked over his response. i am very sorry for his response. I am a canadian and unfortunately a liberal media runs rampant in our country as well a majority of people that comes from our major cities in Canada vote liberal. So when you see a canadian response in favor for a democrat it is because this country is run by a bunch of socialists.


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 12:58 PM by aravoth
reply to post by sos37



Oprah's show is privately owned by, Oprah.... as with all private property, she is free to do what she wants with it, including being as biased as she wants. Honestly I don't see any issue here.

[edit on 6-9-2008 by aravoth]


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 01:01 PM by Loki
reply to post by sos37



Oprah's a talk show host, not an investigative journalist.

Based on US property laws...she is allowed to have who she wants on the show, and not one celebrity more or less, of course allowing for sponsor and studio input etc etc

Please give me your insight as to why Jerry Springer has not tackled the issues at hand. Hell he should just have Obama and McCain on next week. We'll have this whole thing settled before the snow flies.

[edit on 9-6-2008 by Loki]



reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 02:20 PM by riggins44
reply to post by Jay-in-AR



The picture is a proven fake. Jeeze..you could not see that? We get it: You are a liberal Democrate and you are going to pursue your agenda even it you use forgery, false rheteric and negative propaganda.

My gues is if see flopped, we whould not hear about this women. She did very well, far better then most imagined. Bottom line is that she is a concern for the far left.

Bottom line: who cares about Opra? All of this press is a positive for Palin, hence Mcain.


reply posted on 6-9-2008 @ 05:01 PM by NorthWolfe CND
reply to post by Azrael75



No, I'm implying that Oprah shouldn't compromise her Editorial Criteria for financial gains. After all, I don't think she needs the money that desperately. She should stick to her principles, and not invite people who she doesn't identify with.

Palin needs Oprah, and her show. Oprah has nothing to gain from Palin. Simple as that....
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 18 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 18 days ago with 88 member flags
This is what happens when Ford announces they are hiring
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 3 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 5 days ago with 60 member flags