Oprah balks at having Palin on her show, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 04:15 PM by bknapple32
reply to post by intrepid



Repubs just can keep their Obama bashing in check and just assume things that arent true. Oprah has not had Barack on since he won the nom.

SHE DID NOT REFUSE PALIN



reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 05:15 PM by sos37
reply to post by bknapple32



Okay, so Oprah says it's untrue and Drudge says it's true. Oprah says there was never any talk of Palin being on the show, which I find VERY hard to believe given that Palin is such a hot commodity right now, and Drudge says Oprah's staff was divided on whether to have Palin on the show.

Clearly someone is lying.

I would be more inclined to believe the person lying is the one who sticks up for McCain/Palin's opponent:

Oprah endorses Obama
thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com...

then

Winfrey campaigned for Obama in Iowa, which he won, in South Carolina, where he won, and in New Hampshire, where he lost.

Source: latimesblogs.latimes.com...

But you maintain that she didn't refuse Palin. Okay, technically, she didn't. But in reality, she did.

If I told someone I would give them money eventually, but they never got it, could I still maintain that I never denied giving them money? Sure, I guess so, but does it make me look like someone who will never keep my promise? You bet it does. I no more believe Oprah will grant Palin an interview after the election then she would grant a common farmer an interview, especially if Palin wins.


reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 06:13 PM by bknapple32
reply to post by centurion1211



elitist...lol... i love it when the right brings that term up.. See: Cindy Mcains $300,000 suit for elitist.


reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 08:37 PM by jerico65
drudgereport.com...

OPRAH'S STATEMENT: "The item in today's Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this Presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over."


She said she was going to take her first public stance in support of a candidate, and NOT use her show as a platform? That doesn't make any freakin' sense!! It's OK to have Obama (who she's backing), but no one else? That's using your show as a platform, Okrah!!!

"Love to have her on AFTER the campaign is over." Well, when she's the VP, she'll see if she can fit it into her schedule, chubby.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 18 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 18 days ago with 88 member flags
This is what happens when Ford announces they are hiring
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 3 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 5 days ago with 60 member flags