Originally posted by justamomma
reply to post by Amaterasu
uhm, ok
Great job of showing you are not a "sheeple" (even the term that is used in the 'conspiracy herd' shows that you are of the herd mentality...
maybe cattle, in your case? no?)
Ah, yes. That I have looked the evidence over, as well as the curiosity of evidence withheld, coming to the evaluation I have on my own (and rather
knew it was an inside job from the get-go) is irrelevant, I suppose. Because I independently made these conclusions does indeed make me part of a
herd. I roll my eyes a bit.
First off, it is NOT clear that 9/11 was an inside job.
To those who cling to the paradigm that the Government would never become corrupted, never do anything to harm us, cares about us always...I would
guess this would be the case. With an emotional investment of that sort, seeing the forest beyond the trees is problematic.
In fact, I have seen more credible evidence by those who support the official story than by those who believe it was the gov't, that you most
likely support even now financially.
Awesome! Please show *me* that evidence. I have seen none. And what has my "financial support" got to do with anything? Any "financial
support" I might be providing is *involuntary...*
Don't say it is clear our government did it without showing exactly how you *think* it is clear. Proof.. if we are adhering to the often
ignored motto, that is.
Oh, the list is long, presented (in abundance, and over and over) in threads here, and is off topic. I guess I presumed you were strong enough to
have looked away from the safe paradigm to see how it all adds up (I mean, the Pres and VP refusing to testify
under oath - and insisting on
being
together, at that! - should be a minor clue that things are not what they say they are). [shrug]
But if you're happier in your paradigm, enjoy that, then.
And no, just like you most likely have not looked at the ACTUAL evidence of 9/11 and just blindly bought into the conspiracy theorist herd
mentality (as is evidence by the very worn out "sheeple" term),
I have poured through the evidence. I watched a 900+ page document (that could have taken no less that 2 years to produce, and maybe up to 5) land on
Congress's lap in less than 2 months after the incident - one that stripped the Constitution and Bill of Rights from us - and knew that such a tidy
package would NOT have been produced by people "hoping" we could someday provoke an attack. Only if the attack was planned and orchestrated by
those who produced all that would such a thing have been created in anticipation of the event. Just one thing out of hundreds.
And that I use the commonly accepted term for people who cling to the "the Government loves me and would NEVER repeat Hitler's Reichstag to gain
power over me" paradigm is NOT indicative of anything except that I am aware of what it means and know where its use is appropriate.
you definately did not bother reading my posts or you would have known that I view Obama to be the worst thing for this country since the
TERRORISTS who highjacked the planes on 9/11.
I see your "subtle" dig. That the terrorists that hijacked planes were our own government is, I guess, irrelevant... I apologize if I failed to
catch that. I do miss things occasionally.
Ron Paul will be on my ticket for 2008.
Now that is truly awesome. [smile] Regardless of the fact that you somehow see things relative to the New Pearl Harbor differently than I do, at
least we can agree that Paul has the founding documents at heart in his bid for President, unlike the puppets sold to us as if they're our only
choice.
[edit on 9/6/2008 by Amaterasu]