Many people have come to realize that both political parties, the Republicans and the Democrats are completely corrupted. I would believe it, but i
have some qustions....what are the common denominators between the two corrupt parties? Who are the main people that fund both political parties? How
and who do you think is pulling the strings? I've heard of some people like the rothschilds or something like that funding both, who are these people
and who are people like them that are really controlling the parties?
Please feel free to open a discussion about the two parties but i'm looking for how both parties are corrupt by a common denominator. I dont want to
hear how Mcain is Bush's puppet because blah or Obama is an elitist or anything like that. I'm looking for proof of how these parties are corrupt so
please provide facts and or links if possible.
Thanks
-Rimaster
|
I don't think it much a mystery that both parties are pwned by corporations. You're new here, Rimaster; I recommend using the "Search" feature,
as well as the "Premium Video" button at the top of the page, do a little research.
Rockefellers, Rothschilds, et al. are a solid start for the "who" part of your questions. Also, do a search on ATS about the Bilderberg group,
"Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars", and a google video search on "Money Masters".
This material won't necessarily give you specific answers to your questions...finding "proof of how these parties are corrupt" is not quite so
simple, nor so easy. However, if you follow my suggestions it may give you a much bigger, if disheartening idea of what's really going on.
Good luck.
[edit on 9.4.2008 by ItsTheQuestion]
|
A few organizations for you to look into...
aipac
bilderberg group
council on foreign relations
trilateral commission
international monetary fund
And of course the illegal federal reserve
All the above have a stranglehold on our Great Republic.
It's quite the incestuous relationship all those groups have with the united states government.
|
A few things to consider:
Genealogical sources, like the New England Historical Genealogical Society and Burkes Peerage, have shown that 33 of the 42 presidents to Clinton
are related to Charlemagne and 19 are related to England's Edward III, both of whom are of this bloodline. A spokesman for Burkes Peerage, the bible
of royal and aristocratic genealogy based in London, has said that every presidential election since and including George Washington in 1789 has been
won by the candidate with the most royal genes. Now we can see how and why. United States presidents are not chosen by ballot, they are chosen by
blood! Source
Skull and Bones: A Death Cult at the Heart of the United States
Establishment?
Masonic Presidents of the United States
This is the tip of the iceberg, as I have very little knowledge compared to many here. But after just a little research it has become obvious even to
me that these men (political candidates and politicians) are not enemies or in opposition to each other; they are all connected by bloodlines,
societies, social groups, semi-secret organizations, investments and businesses, etc.
From time to time they may jockey for position like children on a sports team, but they are still on the same team. All of the mud-slinging, heated
debates, scandals, etc. are orchestrated for us (the public) to keep us interested, invested, and perpetuate the lie that it will matter who gets
elected. Behind the scenes, the same families and groups are in control regardless who sits in the Oval Office.
My .02
(edit to correct grammatical error)
[edit on 4-9-2008 by Heike]
|
