Your tax dollars hard at work, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 03:36 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by Cowgirlstraitup7



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


somewhat ironic, given that Palin cut funding for Covenant House which helps troubled youths and unwed mothers get themselves set up to face the real world.
voices.washingtonpost.com...



As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 03:47 PM by Cowgirlstraitup7
reply to post by elevatedone



This would be true if these people were standing on a podium telling other people "do as I say not as a do".

You see, you can't tell the whole country you are against something and then do the exact opposite and pay for it with our tax dollars.


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 03:50 PM by elevatedone
reply to post by Cowgirlstraitup7



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


It's not your tax dollars anymore.

What's next, we're going to tell politicians what kind of cars they can buy, because we pay the salary?

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 03:51 PM by loam
Ummmm...in the interest of accuracy:


Image source.

So all she did was reduce funding by roughly 20% for the EXPANSION of a SINGLE facility.

Nice distortion of the facts.

If she were truly against the program all together, she had the line-item veto authority to eliminate the expansion funding COMPLETELY. Yet, she didn't...

Get it? ...or does this nuance escape all you folks working hard to deny ignorance?

[edit on 4-9-2008 by loam]


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:02 PM by jam321
reply to post by Crakeur



According to this website their FY 07 Budget $3,221,318 and their FY 08 Budget: $3,563,957. Seems like they been running their budgets in the 3-4 million range.

sources in pdf format

source1

source2


Could it be that she slashed the funding because they were spending less than that?

Here is the Covenant website

covenanthouseak.org...


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:15 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by jam321



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


don't know why, just see the irony in it.

loam, I said she cut funding. how else should I have said it?



As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.




reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:16 PM by loam
reply to post by jam321





So, in other words, she nearly DOUBLES their funding for an expansion and her opponents see it as the opposite.

Too funny.




[edit on 4-9-2008 by loam]


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:17 PM by loam
reply to post by Crakeur



No disrespect or direct quibbles intended.

Just sayin' is all.

Not terribly accurate. The implication is that she killed, or otherwise severely hobbled, the program.

Obviously not true.

And you have to admit it's even funnier when she actually doubled their size.


[edit on 4-9-2008 by loam]


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:21 PM by sos37
reply to post by loam



She didn't double funding from FY07 to FY08, but according to that post she did INCREASE funding by $342,639 - she didn't cut funding.


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:22 PM by Crakeur
reply to post by loam



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


bah. when someone reduces funding, they refer to it as cutting funding. now, some papers and news outlets referred to it as slashing funding. that implies some serious reduction. cutting funding just means she budgeted less for this program.





As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:27 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Crakeur



I guess she had no clue that at the time that her daughter was going to become a needy pregnant teen.

Interesting I didn't know about that piece of information, thanks


reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 04:27 PM by loam
reply to post by sos37



No. I think you're reading that wrong.

The $3.9 million dollars approved for the program's expansion was signed this year-- either as additional spending for this year or more likely I'm assuming for 2009's budget.

In 2008, the facility already had a budget for $3.5 million. Her approval of another $3.9 million for the expansion nearly doubles it.

[edit on 4-9-2008 by loam]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^