It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing -- the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party -- are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women -- and to many men too -- who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for -- and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
latimes
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for -- and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
I love this article because it goes to the cynical truth of why McCain and the GOP chose Gov Palin, placing the full brunt of the responsibility on them and not her. She after all was minding her own business up until a week ago.
When it became apparent during the closing weeks of the presidential primaries that Barack Obama and not Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination, media newscasters looked for exciting commentary in an increasingly meaningless contest. They pounced on quotations from "Hillary's Women" indicating they would vote for John McCain rather than support their own party's nominee if Obama was the winner or they would simply not vote.
If Republican strategists persuaded McCain to accept Sarah Palin as his running mate in order to capture those votes, they erred immensely. Clinton's 18 million supporters aren't about to jump ship.
Rush Limbaugh and James Dobson, far right Republican diehards, once said they wouldn't vote for McCain but flip-flopped and now have become loyal supporters. Because of the Palin selection, "Hillary's Women" will also make a turnabout and cast their votes for Obama.
Evidently, McCain really expected that putting the energetic young governor of Alaska on the ticket would draw a significant number of those "Hillary Women" to his support. Why else would he choose a veep candidate whose experience in administering anything has been limited to being mayor of a city of 9,000 people and 18 months governing one of the least populated states in the union?
source