It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
To emphasize the point that domestic oil will be cheaper, look at other oil-exporting countries that have more oil than they can use. They have very low gas prices.
Transportation costs add significantly to the price of energy, and are paid by the end consumer.
Originally posted by feydrautha
fact, again; american produced energy = less dependence on foreign energy, i've managed to maintain coherence, you're suggesting that some jobs will go to non americans, i say big deal. you suggest that some exxon stockholders are foreign, i say, big whoop, you stray from assertion i forwarded, because it cannot be refuted directly...
all you can do is diffuse the premise into something it isnt...
still no good reason for not drilling... just some sourpuss negativity that doesnt add up to very much at all
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Originally posted by jsobecky
To emphasize the point that domestic oil will be cheaper, look at other oil-exporting countries that have more oil than they can use. They have very low gas prices.
Transportation costs add significantly to the price of energy, and are paid by the end consumer.
Yes because they're either socialist or government subsidized, which YOU don't want.
Amid bluster over energy, Senate cuts a deal
GOP gets some drilling, nuclear, Democrats get wind, solar incentives
The proposal contains some items on the Republican wish list, such as opening areas of the Outer Continental Shelf to drilling and boosting nuclear power. The Democrats get incentives for wind, solar, and other renewables along with energy efficiency measures — and pay for much of the projected $84 billion cost by eliminating tax breaks on the oil and gas industry
msnbc
Originally posted by jsobecky
As it stands today, the US has no cohesive energy plan. This is a huge failure of our gov't officials and politicians. It is a matter of national security. I have offered some suggestions to begin creating a policy. It does not answer all the questions, true, but then I am not an energy expert. I am merely applying common sense to a problem.
We need a detailed, achievable plan to reach energy independence. Brazil did it; so can we. That should be a top priority of the next administration.
Originally posted by jsobecky
To emphasize the point that domestic oil will be cheaper, look at other oil-exporting countries that have more oil than they can use. They have very low gas prices.
Transportation costs add significantly to the price of energy, and are paid by the end consumer.
Originally posted by dobsonion2
The OP seems very ignorant of how much oil we have in America.Heres a statement from sen. Hatch of Utah. [We have as much oil in oil shale in Utah, Wyoming and Colorado as the rest of the world's oil combined. Liberals and environmentalists can talk all they want about wind, solar and geothermal - all of which I'm for - but last time I checked, planes, trains, trucks, ships and cars don't run on electricity. 98% of transportation fuel right now is oil. Ethanol is the only real alternative, and we're seeing that ethanol has major limitations.
It's pathetic. Environmentalists are very happy having us dependent on foreign oil. They're unhappy with us developing our own. What they forget to say is that shipping fuel all the way from the middle east has a big greenhouse gas footprint too.]
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Rook / Bunch did you see my post above with the breaking news?
What do you think of this deal?
[edit on 9/4/2008 by schrodingers dog]
Originally posted by mhc_70
Its economics 101. Supply and demand. Increase supply and prices will drop.