It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One has to be careful when making jokes about the Republican presidential campaign. They may turn out to be true.
A month ago I wrote a column saying that John McCain wants to drill in your toilet. This comment was intended as a joke at the time, but it turns out to pretty much reflect the Republican position. The Republicans' most effective slogan for the fall election is "drill here, drill now." It all depends on your definition of "here".
The basic issue is straightforward. There is very little oil potentially available in the areas in which the Republicans are anxious to drill here and now. The Energy Information Agency (these are people who work for President Bush) estimates that the oil in the offshore protected areas will eventually add about 0.2% to world's daily oil output. This would be sufficient to lower the price of gas by 3-4 cents a gallon.
theguardian.co.uk
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
And of course McCain will decrease government, why wouldn't he go against what his stupid party's been doing for 8 years.
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
And these are Bush's guys saying this!
"Drill baby Drill"
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by jerico65
Since when has big government done anything good?
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Did you read the rest of his post?
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Did you read the rest of his post?
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Regardless, as long as we continue to rely on drilling we'll just further dig ourselves into our oil-grave. The fact that this proposed drilling will only lower the gas price 3-4 cents per gallon is proof that this is a manufactured issue, being used to divide the more gullible voters into drillers vs. non-drillers.
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
No, he didn't. In fact, he completely mis-quoted me, as in, used the quote button and EDITED what I said to make it look like I said some dumb nonsense.
The situation has been rectified
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by schrodingers dog
Someone made a very good point on the radio yesterday that even if we were able to procure oil from ANWR. There is only ONE pipeline coming out of that area. So if were were to depend on that ONE pipeline, and anything should happen, it can cause problems like we are already having. So even if the oil is there, there isn't a structure to get it out. And it would not be cost beneficial to build more pipe lines.