The Evidence For Jesus' Existence Is Nothing But Hearsay, page 59


Pages: <<  56    57    58    59    60  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 07:19 PM by Good Wolf
reply to post by iismtivu



Revisionist History is one of the major points that have been discussed in this thread.

You want to know God exists?


The point of this thread is not to prove or disprove God.


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 07:54 PM by Nox Vulpes
reply to post by mmiichael



Very good post. I think you summed up where we seem to be in the discussion very succinctly and thoughtfully.

You know, I've never questioned, in all my years of hard, spiritual searching, the actual existence of Jesus. Political radical, religious revolutionary, mystic alchemist....messiah or nutbag...whatever he is/was is very real to me.

[edit on 26-11-2008 by Nox Vulpes]


reply posted on 26-11-2008 @ 08:07 PM by Good Wolf
reply to post by Nox Vulpes



The other thing is that as soon as he was dead, the legend of Jesus was bigger than the real man. Now, 2000 years later, all we have is legend.

[edit on 26/11/2008 by Good Wolf]


reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 08:45 AM by Good Wolf
reply to post by iismtivu



Hey i didn't say I agree with it, I'm just saying that the belief in religion isn't preventing a self-destructive apocalypse.

MAny christians claim that without "God" they would have no morals and there would be no consequences for anything so they go about killing and stealing because they felt like it. That is of course just plain stupidity and ignorance, I can assure you that because I used to be a christian and I'm not in the streets killing and stealing just because I feel like it.




[edit on 27/11/2008 by Good Wolf]


reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 08:52 AM by Good Wolf
reply to post by iismtivu



Yea well the bible says alot of things.

No one is suggesting that evidence for Jesus is hearsay, we are stating as a matter of fact, that it is. It's a matter of the historic record -course that dons't mean he doesn't exist, just that no one can say that he does exist with any certainty at all.

[edit on 27/11/2008 by Good Wolf]



reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 09:14 AM by Good Wolf
reply to post by iismtivu



Despite that evidence that your grandparents can be faked is true, all that stuff still counts as contemporary evidence for your grandparents. After all, you exists so you have to have grandparents.

With jesus, outside of the bible there is next to nothing, only one account mentions him by name (which is thought to be an interpolation) and some others referring to a christ (which only means 'annointed one').

There are no eye witness accounts, no artefacts, no grafiti - just hearsay.


reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 09:23 AM by mortalengine
reply to post by AlexG141989



No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling, works of carpentry, or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus. Devastating to historians, there occurs not a single contemporary writing that mentions Jesus. All documents about Jesus got written well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus, or from fraudulent, mythical or allegorical writings.


The reason there is no record is most likely because Pilate did not actually want to execute Jesus - mainly because there was no REAL crime committed and it would have been wrong. The only reason he did this was to appease the Jews and thereby prevent rioting which would have ultimately lost him his position in the area. He was basically on probation at the time, 3 strikes and you're out - he was on his second strike already so to speak.

the reason there is no record of Jesus in history is because the word Jesus is fairly recent, it's not what he would have been called. There are many different names for him as he travelled around. You can check out Issa, perhaps the scribe of Damascus etc.

I think what is more important here is that SOMEONE came up with these words, if not Jesus then who ? - either way it is not the man that has inspired us but the idea behind the man, and that my friend is real. You must understand that at the time he was banding out these concepts and ideas - people were still ritually sacrificing thousands of animals on the passover, woman were lesser beings and people were stoned on a whim.


reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 09:30 AM by Good Wolf
reply to post by iismtivu



Hearsay status doesn't negate existence, you don't seem to get that. Evidence doesn't change reality, it informs us how likely something is, how positive we can be that something happened.

We have no real corroborating evidence of the bible's account of Jesus, it doesn't even seam to agree with itself on a few things. Yet outside of the bible we have nothing (almost). An objective assessment is that it's likely he didn't exist, but we just can't know for sure.
Pages: <<  56    57    58    59    60  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Testament Fairy Tales
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
A Brief Rant On Religion
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Obama has declared himself the messiah?
  Posted 3 days ago with 13 member flags