It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
Just for the record, I do not dispute the existance of Jesus, but do have doubts as to his Divinity, for various reasons.
Originally posted by Kapyong
It's a great TV show.
But archeologists and historians do NOT agree.
Kapyong.
On March 28, 1980, a construction crew developing an apartment complex in Talpiot, Jerusalem, uncovered a tomb, which archaeologists from the Israeli Antiquities Authority excavated shortly thereafter. Archaeologist Shimon Gibson surveyed the site and drew a layout plan. Scholar L.Y. Rahmani later published "A Catalogue of Jewish Ossuaries" that described 10 ossuaries, or limestone bone boxes, found in the tomb. Scholars know that from 30 B.C. to 70 A.D., many people in Jerusalem would first wrap bodies in shrouds after death. The bodies were then placed in carved rock tombs, where they decomposed for a year before the bones were placed in an ossuary. Five of the 10 discovered boxes in the Talpiot tomb were inscribed with names believed to be associated with key figures in the New Testament: Jesus, Mary, Matthew, Joseph and Mary Magdalene. A sixth inscription, written in Aramaic, translates to "Judah Son of Jesus."
The findings also suggest that Jesus and Mary Magdalene might have produced a son named Judah. The DNA findings, alongside statistical conclusions made about the artifacts — originally excavated in 1980 — open a potentially significant chapter in Biblical archaeological history.
The study concludes that the odds are at least 600 to 1 in favor of the Talpiot Tomb being the Jesus Family Tomb. In other words, the conclusion works 599 times out of 600.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by shearder
Eloquently said. Where did you find that source?
Originally posted by shearder
This, in particular, can be found here: Link
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Do you doubt Homer wrote the Illiad? There is a 400 year time gap between when it was written and the earliest copy we have. There are only about 600 copies in existence.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Convex
You miss an even bigger point than having to accept a 'humanized' Jesus. They would also have to accept that he did not rise from the dead and accend into 'Heaven', as his bones were in his ossuary.
ED. This would call into question his divinity.
[edit on 19-9-2008 by JaxonRoberts]
Originally posted by Convex
i don't think we can count a discover channel tv guide entry as a source....
"I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore"
Jesus Christ
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Can you prove that? Because otherwise, it's just hearsay, and only supports the title of the thread.