Originally posted by Solarskye
I want more proof that these "known facts'" are indeed facts or just more BS.
They are all true, as far as I know. I've been posting link-sources & other evidence to back up most of those truths: In fact, I don't have source
links for each & every one
of those truths directly
, but many of those source links that I have posted will lead to others that tell the
more of the story of how unlawful, illegal & illegitimate the US government actually is.
About the only thing I cannot confirm with reasonable certainty as fact
is whether the Vatican/Church actually owns/runs everything...Evidence
on points related to that are a bit sketchy. I don't have any specific references that I have already read bookmarked or anything either...Except
that I consider to be opinion rather than fact because it's excerpted from an
interview with the author of a book. I haven't really spent much research time on that particular point.
I can't list all of my sources & links here, but look for my past Threads & Posts in my Profile to see what I've been posting & where the links
are...I've been doing this for some months
now, so you'll have to go back quite a ways to cover what I don't link to from this post. Be
prepared for a looong read...It took me several months to find & read what I've been researching. Most of my research has actual basis in the Law &
how it's (mis)applied on a widespread, consistent basis.
Originally posted by Lebowski achiever
Number three is correct (up to a point)
Yeah, up to a point...The US has
a Treasury, but there's no gold or silver left in it. It was all paid to the Fed Res to (unsuccessfully) pay
off the federal deficit decades ago & it all got shipped & banked overseas. JFK tried to wean us off the FRN's & get gold/silver-backed currency back
into circulation...See Executive Order 11110
to learn more about it. It's never been
repealed, but it's been completely ignored by every President since JFK. As a side note, every time you "have to" pay taxes to the IRS, you may
notice that your check won't go to the US Treasury...The IRS instructs you to "Make check payable to" the IRS itself. This means that whatever you
send them illegally goes somewhere else
besides the Treasury: It goes to the Fed Res & then to the IMF.
That's why the US is using the "Debt-currency" represented by Federal Reserve Notes...Each FRN is a certificate of debt to the Fed Res (& the IMF)
& is really nothing more than "corporate scrip."
Originally posted by nunya13
Need to research this more but I noticed that some IRS publications do cite "IMF" but this is the Individual Master File.
That particular IMF refers only
to help specifically define what's in the IRC (Internal Revenue Code) itself. There is indeed an organization
called the International Monetary Fund that's connected with the World Bank...But that's not the same as the IMF mentioned in the IRC. This is one
of their tricks to nail you...They even "redefine" the actual words under the Codes to make you think of the "common-usage" word to mean the same
thing. They're also tricky in the use of using separate definitions of the same word, depending on how they use capital letters & lower-case
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
It may be called...We're Running Out of Time? I feel like thats it, if not, I'm sorry to mislead you.
Actually, you're right about the thread you mentioned
. There's also another
that has a lot of related info.
Originally posted by sdrawkcabII
Can anyone lay any real substantial evidence about these "facts". Because I cannot believe something if there is doubt and question. The people who
do know...I need to see why you know. Why this is real. What makes it proof.
You'll find evidence & proof aplenty by reading those two threads just linked above...They in turn link to a whole plethora of information.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
"16) The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary War.
(Treaty of Versailles- July 16, 1782
Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80) "
This is inaccurate.
The Rothschild international banking cartel formed in the 1770s in London, England financed both sides of not only the Revolutionary War but BOTH
sides of every war America has ever fought. Research and know the truth. Then act accordingly.
This is true. You're basically saying here that it was the Rothchilds giving backing to the King...In which case both statements are very closely
related. You just went up one more step of the money-ladder.
Originally posted by network dude
So our choice is to be worried that our entire existance is an illusion and we are all slaves to the elite, or we can go on like we have been and be
happy. Have I got that right or am I missing something?
One of my favorite sayings is "Beer, proof that God wants us to be happy"
No, it doesn't sound like you're missing anything...But at least you have a start on learning the "hows & whys" of modern enslavement. You still
have your Freedom of Choice to ignore the info.
That quote you posted was by Benjamin Franklin...
Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
When the IRS gets on your case, you are guilty until proven innocent. The burden of proof is on you, and it can take years and will bankrupt the
It will bankrupt you if you don't understand the legal processes actually involved. The IRS wants you
to initiate court action against them.
That makes them Defendant & you the Plaintiff, which is how the burden of proof falls on you: And by the 5th Amendment, you can't even subpoena their
records for your case!
You need to use Admiralty Jurisdiction in a District Court to fight them...Admiralty Jurisdiction is very limited & you may (with proper knowledge of
the law) use that jurisdiction against them. More details are discussed here
it doesn't show up until later in the thread...I needed the time to do the research while the thread got longer...
Originally posted by shmoo
...friend of the family who drove without a driver's license, never paid taxes, etc. every time she was taken to court she was able to prove that
the laws under the constitution did not apply to her...
Actually, you have that backwards...The Constitution does indeed apply to her! It's just that, in Common Law (Article 3 Court), she was able to prove
that they were using Statutory Laws
against her, which is how she was able to win...Statutory law only applies to the federal government
officers, corporations directly contracted to the federal government & individuals who (even unknowingly) sign contracts with the federal government
or live or work as US citizens outside of the boundaries of the 50 States.
Let me guess...That friend of the family had a Record of Live Birth filed at the County Records Office, instead of a registered Birth Certificate &
did not have a Social Security Card? Those are two of the (individual's) contracts that make you obliged to abide by Statutory Law. If you don't
know how to answer this question, why not talk to that friend & ask (If you can)? Evidently, she already knows at least as much, if not more, about
this than I do...
Originally posted by fbipeeperjr
To be honest about all this, it comes down to guns. Sounds simple and stupid, but let me explain why. I know people who have "removed" themselves
from the system.. went to court to get rid of S.S... that kinda stuff. Unfortunately, many of these people also are tax cheats, so you sure get
scrutinized when you do such things.
Some of the groups that you run into are tax cheats, in that they also want you to pay them money to learn the system...And then don't pay taxes on
the business they run
under that premise. In my researches, I stay away from those groups & concentrate on those who do
they're talking about & they are not tax cheats...They only research the truth about who exactly is liable for lawfully-imposed taxation
adjust their lifestyles to not fit into Statutory liability. The difference is subtle, but very tangible...They don't protest against lawful taxes,
but question how the IRS illegally "stretch their true jurisdiction" to include everyone who falls outside
of their jurisdiction. They still
wind up getting "labeled" as tax protesters because that's how the system works to denigrate the People & try to devalue the laws that protect the
real Freeman in society.
The main key (under the Law) is that everyone who wants or needs the government to provide "benefits" for them has to enter into contract with the
government to do so...In which case, such people "volunteer" to also abide by whatever Statutory regulations they wish to impose. Those who "enter
into contract" with the government are literally "begging" for the government to take care of that responsibility for them. Conversely, someone who
wants to live their life free of such contractual obligation & fully exercise their inherent Rights as defined under Constitutional Law (Common Law),
they must also abide by the inherent personal responsibility to take care of themselves.