Originally posted by Tomis_Nexis
Originally posted by Alferd Packer
I got so so so SO pissed off when i Heard on the Radio yesterday that Bush and Chaney sent 1 Billion dollars worth in Aid to Georgia. WTF !!!!
It's not aid, it's a loan. Don't let the media fool you. Here's how it goes:
Hmmm...That makes all
the difference, doesn't it? Let's see, in all of American history, is there any nation that hasn't defaulted
loans we give them? After the default, then it's wasn't a loan, was it? No, it's become "aid." If the "loan" was issued in "American
Dollars," then it could never be a true "loan" anyway.
Here's how it really
The Fed Res Bank giving loans to our government is what helped bankrupt the country
in the first place! When the government went bankrupt, it
was turned into a "corporate branch" of the Federal Reserve Bank. Would this mean that the USA actually wants
other nations to default on
such loans for the exact same purpose the the banks ran the USA into bankruptcy? How can a nation that's already bankrupt (USA) actually issue loans
in the first place? Is it a "loan" if there's no actual assets put at risk? If it can't be a "loan," then the truth must be that it's "aid,"
even right from the inception of the "transaction."
BTW, that's how banks did it to the American public too...If you default on a "loan" & they drag you into court (do everything you can to make sure
are the ones to drag you
into court...That makes you
the defendant & you can fight them more effectively), subpoena their
accounting entries for that "transaction." The truth is, there was no real "transaction of substance" because their records will show that the
banks accounts still zero out
. The banks cannot issue any loans legally because putting bank assets at risk violates the Fed Res regulations &
they can't put any of the banks' client-assets at risk because it's a violation of General Accounting regulations...So, in the end, they manipulate
the records so that the bank's accounts still zero out. There can be no "loan" if there is no risk of assets.
So, in truth, you weren't "loaned" anything so the "interest rate" is illegal. The truth is that credit
was generated by your signature &
since the banks literally generate FRN's out of thin air, they're worth nothing anyway. No Loan Transaction with Substance = No Repayments with
Substance: You can discharge the debt by "Repayment in kind," which means "Credit for credit." Legally, it's tricky, but if/when you learn how,
it really does work. This is why you should never sign for any "loan" that gives them "collateral." In essence, your signature finances the
initial loan & your "substantive property" re-finances it again! If they have any of your property as "collateral," that loan contract gives them
the legal right
(but no Constitutional Right) to confiscate it...Thereby making you pay your
Substance for that Unsubstantial "loan."
The Constitution clearly states that none of the States can use anything but gold or silver for money...It also states that Congress is delegated the
Power to "coin our money & determine the value thereof." If the Federal Government issues anything but gold or silver, it must be backed by gold or
silver in storage. This is what JFK's Executive Order 11110
was all about...To
"wean" America off of the illegality of the Fed Res & its FRN's & to put real money with real substance
back into circulation.
But the Fed Res Bank literally prints up money from thin air, because it only costs 2 cents to print any number they want on the FRN's (but the
actually pays that 2-cent cost, not the Fed Res). So, the difference
between the actual cost to print compared to the
denomination on the "money" itself represents pure profit to the Fed Res Bank...The FRN's are nothing more than "corporate scrip," a
certificate of debt
to the Fed Res. This is why a "bank loan" that you apply for constitutes "no transaction of substance."
This is one of the "economy problems" that Ron Paul is definitely aware of...But due to his position in Congress, he may not be able to tell it all
in the open. But he certainly has had to deal with it
in his 30+ years in Congress! This is why he says that the Fed Res is illegal...Because
I don't know who originally said this, but it's quite true: "If you can't conquer an enemy with your army, you send in your lawyers." This also
holds true by sending in your accountants...
Originally posted by BlackOps719
The part with Jessie Ventura talking about pro wrestling being real and politics being fake...that was hilarious.
Well, WWE stands for "World Wrestling Entertainment,
" so you at least get told right up front that they're trying to entertain you...That's
honesty! I still watch it because it makes me think of a soap opera after being thoroughly hosed down with testosterone.
After all, if many of those "blood feuds" between individual wrestlers was for real, then how could you claim that they just have to
the ring before
they settle their arguments? They all seem to be running around pretty freely backstage
, don't they? Why not settle up
in private? Of course, they can only make their money by settling the feuds in front of a paying audience! Why else do you think that so many
wrestling stars wind up making movies?...Jessie Ventura included! See, Jessie is right! Wrestling is more honest
Originally posted by autowrench
I too am a long time Ron Paul follower. Here is what I will do on election day. I will insist on a Paper Ballot. Paper leaves a "paper trail" that
can easily be followed, and is very heard to alter, unlike electronic voting machines.
Even if any particular State still "requires" the electronic voting machines, voters can still request Absentee Ballots...Those are always
paper. Just make sure you get your request in on time, or you'll never get your actual vote in before the deadline. I'm lucky in that my State still
uses paper ballots...Counted by a machine, but the paper's still there for verification. Of course, "he who counts
the ballots determines
the winner," so I still can't guarantee that Absentee Ballots won't be ignored...
As for myself, I intend to either write in Ron Paul/Jessie Ventura, or just go with "No Confidence/None of the Above."
Originally posted by Lebowski achiever
How would he take care of the people who really cannot take care of themselves?
How would he ensure that healthcare was made available to all without having to mortgage your home when the insurance won't pay for
To get Dr. Paul's answer would best be done by reading what he's already said about those problems...But IMO:
First thing to do is to educate people
on how they can best take the responsibility for themselves on how to best achieve their own goals in
life...People must stop begging the government to take the responsibility of running their lives because the government's already done a real bang-up
job of it, haven't they?
At best, give people a bit of help (through the State taxes if necessary, but leave the feds out of it) so they can get started taking care of
themselves & let them take it from there...Stop giving "handouts" for their whole lives, because that's just another way to keep people
"regulated" by the government for their whole lives.
Health care is best done for yourself: Begin to set up trust funds with specific terms for payments, just like what the professional insurance
companies do...The biggest difference is that you don't have to depend on a corporation's decisions on what will be getting paid for. Insurance
corporations are little more than "legalized protection scams" in that keep taking your premiums but do everything they can to "justify" not
paying out when you really need it & they also use your
money for long-term investments that reap bigger profits for themselves...Wouldn't
your life work out so much better if you were doing that for yourself?
The key is, don't put your dependence on anyone else...Take the responsibility for yourself because you're the one least likely to betray you! It's
not easy to actually get situated for this, but you'll have a lot more peace of mind in the long run. Also, teach your kids how to do the same for
themselves for when they grow up: They may seem to hate you at first for cramming all they need to know into their heads, but once they actually take
over for their own lives & come to understand
what you were doing for them, they'll probably thank you for it. Wouldn't that kind of
recognition warm any parent's heart? Dr. Paul has delivered enough babies in his time to see the glow in the faces of new parents to understand.
It seems to me that this is one of the things Ron Paul is trying to tell us...Stop feeding the government so that it keeps getting bigger & more
invasive. By taking care of ourselves, we reduce the apparent need
for big government.