The term mutilation is used to describe animal corpses with unusual or strange features by UFO believers. What counts as unusual is just about any
cut, mark, wound, excision, incision, swelling, distention, abrasion, contusion, scrape, bruise, or organ or blood absence. These "mutilations," we
are told, are being done by bad aliens. No one has shown either that there are thousands of inexplicable animal deaths around the globe or that, if
there are, they are related, much less that they are the result of alien experimentation. These facts, however, do nothing to deter those who are sure
we are not alone. And not only are they not detered but even go further and say some of these aliens are destroying crops around the globe in an
effort to impress us with their artistic abilities or to communicate to us in strange symbols just how much they like our planet's cattle.
The belief that aliens have been butchering and mutilating thousands of animals is supported by absolutely no credible evidence. Since there is a lack
of evidence that they aren't responsible for the deaths or the seemingly unusual conditions of the animals, it follows that the aliens are
responsible. To deny the notion that there is an earthly explanation is to deny what makes the evidence scientific to begin with. They are convinced
that aliens need cow blood and organs for their experiments. What seems most convincing to the true believers is that wounds or missing organs—such
as the tongue, the genitalia, soft tissue in and around the eye, seem completely inexplicable to them in any but mysterious and disturbing ways.
Natural explanations in terms of diseases and predators insects or birds are to no avail, even though the most thorough examination of so-called
cattle mutilations concluded there was nothing mysterious that needed explaining. It is useless to note that insects and animals often devour the
vulnerable mucous membranes and the softer parts of dead animals such as the genitalia, instead of trying to burrow through the cowhide. It is
pointless to note that incisions to a carcass by the teeth of predators or scavengers often resemble knife cuts. It is pointless to note that
bloating often leads to skin splitting in straight lines resembling incisions and exposing internal organs. It is of no use to point out that there is
little or no blood oozing from the wounds because blood settles, the heart does not pump when an animal is dead, and insects devour the blood that
does spill out. And it is certainly pointless to describe the experiment done by the Washington County Sheriff's Department. They placed a dead cow
in a field and had observers watch what happened over the next 48 hours. When they reported that bloating led to incision-like tears in the skin and
that blowflies and maggots had cleaned out the soft tissue so that the carcass looked exactly like those that had been attributed to UFOs , they were
generally ignored by the community of true believers.
Since there is simply a stunning amount of evidence to support my argument im going to cut it a little short this time. Im going to save my big guns
for the event that my opposition actually descides to show him/her self
. I do however have a couple of questions to pose to my opponent.
Q1.) Could you provide one shred of credible evidence that ufos are responsible for cattle mutilations?
Q2.) What scientific evidence could be put forth by the skeptics to sway the ufo community?
Q3.) What evidence is there to support that it is in fact ufos and if not caused naturally, that it could not be chubicabbra or satanist or any number
of other devious entities?