What does the RNC ticket offer Women this election?, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 2-9-2008 @ 09:15 PM by Andrew E. Wiggin

John McCain





John McCain voted against "equal pay for equal work" in April earlier this year.

John McCain offers us an explanation as to why he voted against offering women equal pay for equal work


"This is government playing a much, much greater role in the business of a private enterprise system."
source



So – John McCain does not support federal regulation of equal pay for equal work, because it’s “intrusive government”…that he doesn’t support? (keep reading for the reason the question mark exists)














John McCain says women should not have a right to their own reproductive freedom.



To further that, John McCain supports an intrusive Federal Government who would regulate the states to prohibit states deciding on women rights.



He's also sponsored pro-life legislation -- one bill that would make it a federal crime to transport a minor across state lines to get an abortion and avoid a parental consent law, for instance.
source




But here we see a Different John McCain.

I'd love to see a point where (Roe vs. Wade) is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to (undergo) illegal and dangerous operations.
- John McCain (source)


But ultimately - John McCain tells us that he is pro life.
But what exactly is pro-life?

The term describes the political and ethical view which maintains that fetuses and embryos are human beings, and therefore have a right to live

and

it can be used to indicate opposition to practices such as euthanasia, the death penalty, human cloning, and research involving human embryonic stem cells.
source

But in the issue of Abortion, John McCain tells us that Abortion is okay as long as the woman was raped...

McCain was asked whether he would reinstate the Reagan era rule that prevents international family planning clinics that receive federal funds from discussing abortion.

McCain said that he opposed abortion except in cases of rape and incest. He was then asked how he would determine whether someone had in fact been raped. McCain responded, “I think that I would give the benefit of the doubt to the person who alleges that.”
Sources

So we should trust them? Or we should give them a scapegoat to allow them to have an abortion, John McCain?

Allow me a moment to speak to the McCain Campaign and their supporters:

If you are truly pro-life, then abortion should not be okay in any instance. To say Abortion is OKAY in the event of rape or incest is to accommodate the MOTHER, and not the unborn fetus.

It is because of this hypocritical stance from "pro-lifers" like John McCain that we can truly, and accurately, state that they are, indeed, " ANTI Pro-choice" where women are concerned, and i can base that statement in pure factual substance by using the very definition of "pro-life" as provided by those who support it. (view references for validation of this statement)

















Sarah Palin



To start off, Sarah Palin is a member of Feminists For Life

This is an organization, obviously comprised of women, who take a strong pro-life stance to abortion. So strong in fact, that they are able to not contradict themselves in adherence with the definition of being pro life

We can see from the FFL website that this organization does not support Abortion even in the event of rape or incest.

I disagree with them - but ATLEAST they stick to their guns, and dont have any cherry pickable arguments in order to favor abortion.


So.


To encompass the entirety of what we currently know about Gov. Palin:

She is a fierce opponent of abortion and same-sex marriage. She supports the death penalty and the teaching of creationism in schools. Palin is an enthusiast for the outdoors and a gun owner, and is opposed to environmental restrictions on drilling in Alaska.
source

By the precise definition of Pro-Life - as given to us by Pro-Life - Gov. Palin is not pro-life. She is anti-choice. The Death Penalty (even though i strongly support it) isnt being pro-life. Its pro-death. Hence the name.

Yes - i do support the death penalty, and i do support pro-choice. I do not- however, call myself pro-life, as the definition does not allow me to believe how *I* want, and is a play on words by anti-choice advocates in order to defeat the rights of women to have reign over their own reproductive system.





and just recently - we see Sarah Palin decided to no-show at the Republican National Coalition for Life:
Today, Palin's scheduled appearance in St. Paul, Minn., as guest of honor at an afternoon gathering by the Republican National Coalition for Life was canceled. And that didn't sit well with a leading social conservative.

Phyllis Schlafly, who in the mid-1970s almost single-handedly derailed what had been the expected ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, told ABC News that a McCain aide notified her late Monday that Palin would not be attending the event.

"I think this is clearly somebody in the McCain campaign who doesn't understand where the votes are coming from," Schlafly said. "They only told me this at 10 o'clock last night, and it was a call from somebody down the line in the McCain campaign."


She added:
"The pro-lifers who paid $95 to come to this event because of Sarah Palin are going to be very unhappy."


Palin's appearance was set up before she was picked for the GOP's national ticket, McCain aides stressed. And her spokeswoman, Maria Comella, told ABC that Palin needed to pass on the antiabortion event to work on her speech to the Republican National Convention.


source

















Conclusion



So there ya have it.

We’ve seen that both candidates, McCain and Palin, stand in opposition of equal pay for women, and freedom of choice for them too, and we’ve seen how they choose to condone their approach.

BUT!

In the light of optimism, the McCain campaign does offer the American citizens as a whole their own form of change

Currently,

California, New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts all recognize gay American citizens the right to marriage. source

And

Currently – abortion is a choice that is not regulated by federal law in order to make it illegal.

So

If that’s today’s world, and the Palin/McCain ticket offers to constituationally disallow gay marriage, and to make abortion illegal, then you can begin to see what kind of change this republican campaign offers to our country.
It seems the only change we’re going to see is a revert back about 50 years, to a time of ignorance and fear.





Is that change…..you…..can believe in ?




reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 10:45 AM by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Fathom



Her name is PALIN. (Pay-lin). You do her a disservice to display her picture and continue to spell it (and no doubt pronounce it) wrong.

And did you answer what the RNC has to offer or did I miss your answer?

No panicking here. "Shear" or otherwise.

[edit on 3-9-2008 by Benevolent Heretic]


reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 12:51 PM by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by GeneralLee




You seem to think they need defending. Therefore, they cannot think for themselves or act for themselves. Typical Liberal thought process.


let me give you a tip: don't pretend you know me. Because you're wrong.

I dont think women are defenseless.
I do think that John McCain and Sarah Palin don't support womens rights
I do think that John McCain and Sarah Palin don't support Gay rights
I do think that John McCain and Sarah Palin don't give a damn about the environment

I do think that John McCain and Sarah Palin don't give a damn about anything other than their own pocket books and the presidency of this country.

Thats it.

I do think that they are selfish.
I also think you're taking a cheap road in insinuating that i don't believe women can stand up for themselves

plenty of women do that all on their own

simply because i AGREE with what they say, doesnt mean that i think they are weak so i have to say it too

your logic, or absence there of, simply astounds me.

McCain/Palin

a vote for change
only if you're gay or a woman. And if you're a gay woman...you're really screwed



and



Aw come on Andrew women's rights? You have taken generalization to a whole new level.


What is generalized about womens rights?
Why should a woman have no right over her own reproductive system?

And why should the Federal Government not protect women against discriminating corporations by demanding and enforcing equal pay for equal work?

Generalizing?

Please.

You're blind to the real world my man.
You need to wake up

[edit on 9/3/2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]



reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 02:13 PM by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by GeneralLee



First off, the environment arguemnt existed in the OP
you would know that had you read before you replied


secondly

but I can guarantee you that if I attempted to shove miopic, hearsay statements through a thread like you have, there would certainly have been one hell of a hissy fit pitched!


What is hearsay about what i've laid out?
The candidates themselves spoke the words and voted the bills that i've shown in the OP

It is 100% anti-gay rights
It is 100% anti-women rights

Period.

The post was about women rights, and i had full intentions on doing a second one about gay rights....but it fits in well here as well.

They are opposed to giving rights to women and gay people

How is that statement false?

Prove me wrong.

You are making accusations that I *AM* wrong - but you arent giving us reasons *WHY* I'm wrong

Typical conservative bull *snip*

You talk talk talk
but when it comes time to prove up

you run run run

Are you going to finally be the one who stays and says "mccain and palin arent against rights for gay people and women because they ___________"
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags