tide88, pinch and Reheat:
SWORD31 definitely wasn't the E-4B seen over the White House.
See the above posted radar screen shot.
So which E-4B was flying there? Definitely another one.
Isn't it damn strange, that TWO of the four E-4B's were in the vicinity of the White House and the Pentagon, on a day that the US military seemed to
have been caught off-guard in an immensely strange bundle of coincidences?
And that those E-4B's would be expected to fly much further north, aiding in the war games concerning an artificial assault by Russian planes on the
USA.
It really looks like this was all orchestrated by the Joint Chiefs.
Source: 911MysteryPlane PDF.
www.journalof911studies.com...
Schedule Change in 2001.
In previous years the military always staged Global Guardian in October or
November and, according to various reports, the 2001 exercise was likewise
originally scheduled for October.xxxvi However, for reasons that have
never been disclosed, the Joint Chiefs changed the plan and conducted the
2001 exercise during the week of September 11. The following year the
date reverted back. The 2002 Global Guardian came off in October, as in
previous years, and this has continued to be the case.xxxvii
We know that an E-4B was flying to Offutt AFB, it could be that SWORD31 was that plane, and thus the plane above the White House is for sure another
one.
We do know that on 9/11 one of the E-4Bs was en route to Offutt AFB with a high-level military advisory panel on board, including its chairman,
retired Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, evidently for the purpose of observing the exercise. The role of this panel, whose official name is the Foreign
Intelligence Advisory Board (FIAB), is to monitor US intelligence agencies. STRATCOM reportedly terminated the 2001 exercise at 9:03 AM, when Flight
175 crashed into the South Tower.xxxiv However, the E-4Bs remained aloft.xxxv As I have shown, one of them circled over Washington.
Source for the following explanation, the new RADES screen captures:
aal77.com...
The two restricted airspaces were never compromised by a visible radar blip in this new RADES screen. Thus the E-4B spotted above the White House must
have flown with its transponder OFF!
That's also why the Secret Service was panicking, that plane didn't turn up on their feeds from the FAA and from the 84RADES radar group.
There are two restricted airspaces to be found in the new RADES screen shots.
One small circle above the center, the Vice-president's quarters, to the right of the two dotted lines (River Approach) leading to the DCA radar dish
on the northeastern top of Reagan Airport.
And one somewhat "crystal" cubic formed one, the P56 area, just to the right of the spot where those two dotted lines meet at the northern top of
the runways of Reagan Airport.
If you follow the flight paths of the mentioned planes with their call signs attached in the new RADES video, you can observe the following events at
the specified times:
33:42.4 GOPHER06 (C-130) appears for the first time, already picked up by radar at take-off from Andrews AFB runway. That low, radar picked already a
radar return up from GOPHER06, the C-130 from Lt.Colonel O'Brien.
Conclusion: the E-4B in my above posted photo above the White House had its transponder turned of, otherwise it would have been visible at FAA radar
screens and RADES screens. Every time Washington Central took over a plane from the FAA teams or the 84RADES teams, they asked them to change
transponders, and thus these planes disappeared from those screens as blips with a call sign.
A FOIA would be urgent needed for the Washington Central command post radar data. I think it will be stonewalled with the usual "national security"
rubbish.
35:47.0 Flight 77 turns up as an "S" in a radar return blip, on its way descending to the Pentagon, in the middle of its proposed big loop on a
northeastern course.
The C-130 is still flying its nearly straight western course, and is visible on the radar screen, just under the DCA radar dish, which is the center
point of the radar screen in the video.
36:28.6 The screen indicator letter for the C-130 changes from "T" to a "2".
36:37.7 "S" is now head-on in front of "2", i.o.w., flight 77 crosses the flight path of the C-130 at the 12 o'clock position.
38:19.3 S (flight 77) disappeared from the screen, so is just seconds away from the Pentagon west wall.
The C-130 (2) is turning around on a straight eastern course (080°) to the Pentagon, to follow flight 77.
39:51.6 The C-130 (2) starts turning sharp to the north just in front of the Pentagon. The smoke column where it flies through, is then already at
least 500 meters high, so observable from the White House grounds.
Thus the second E-4B (not SWORD31) should be visible at the RADES radar screen in P56 restricted airspace, but is nowhere to be seen. See posted photo
of an E-4B.
SWORD31 is then already off the screen in the upper northeastern corner of the radar screen.
BOBCAT17 is still in the southeastern part of the screen, while BOBCAT14 has changed transponder signal already many minutes before and disappeared
from the center of the screen as a recognizable blib with a call sign, no other blip of it to be found anymore on that course.
41:05.6 This is the point where the C-130 (2) starts turning to the northeast on its new course, a 60° turn upwards on the screen.
We are left with some questions,
1. Why were 2 E-4B's flying around the Pentagon and the White House, when they weren't forewarned?
2. Why were the two fighter jets not directed to the certain threat that flight 77 already was?
3. Why was SWORD31 not using its jamming capabilities to down flight 77?
Why was the other one doing neither?
4. Were the passengers of the second E-4B on a sight seeing tour aboard that Doomsday plane, to see if all went according plans?
5. Why were slow planes as those 2 E-4B's and the C-130 capable of taking off, but no jet fighters were launched in time? A box of 50 millimeter
cannon bullets was all what was needed to arm any fighter at ALL the AFBases around Washington.
6. Which idiot send those other two armed fighters on their usual sea bound take-off path, when at that time he already knew about the situation in
New York and the incoming threads towards Washington? Why is he not fired?
7. Why must we ask through FOIA's for every nagging little detail, when obviously, when there is no foul play around, those withholding institutions
could easily hand over every little tidbit of information instantly, which should clear them from any suspicion.
Etcetera.
