It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MARTIAN-MADE structures,paths,statues...please POST

page: 7
3
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2008 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Thank you for the photo, and all, ArMaP, as usual!


I'd really like to get more info about Mars potential icing past processes and, in geology altogether, but I know that things like this take years to study really.

Je ne sais pas!

"Google MARS"...these things bug & amaze me. I was still in awe that we have Google Earth, now I come across Googl' amazing Mars! wow. I was lost in this last night, I was trying to google this region via HIRISE and others, I think.
I got lost...go on, laugh,..but safely back, ;-). Yes I really missed this one, I got to admit, sometimes, that if I think I find an intersting zone to perhaps copy in image and put onto here, I won't be able to say which exact manoeuvres I did on the map, then ppl asking me , which exact location, err... left right from the North-East, bit under that to your west...you're glad you haven't got me as guide to missions there


So...structures, artificial or natural...ice/no ice....don't forget the differences of temperatures as in nowadays Earth/Mars, and it's got to be different from this nowadays Earth, where Ice can be found, on a permanent basis, on the poles...and only on few other areas (like high mountains tops / perhaps else... quiote scarecely if we compare to our whole Globe), but on Mars... it's different! further researches needed, let's be patient, we still got ATS and the room for new threads,


Sometimes things look like water or sand deserts, even on Earth, but if we dig further (and I don't mean by just photo-editing, as this would be too simple, don't worry I am on the same wave-length as you) , we get to know ,after RESEARCH, it's not this or that...

Think, when we find archeology sites on Earth, and the common TV viewer exclaims, "What are they on about? It's JUST ROCKS! etc", but really, after checking, it is ancient traces of an old civilisation... we don't know, ArMaP, we don't.

PS. Do you know about this one thing I heard of, = a big CATACLYSM that occured on Mars?
I'll be honest, I trust the person who said it, but I haven't searched there. Hope you can give me some answers?, thank you A.

__________________________________________________________


(Sub-Sig: "No Rocks Unturned" ...yeah well...)

[edit on 21-9-2008 by MarsFanMag]




posted on Sep, 21 2008 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by ChChKiwi


I'm not trying to knock you down, I'm just adding my two bits, as others can and do as well.

Not so.
The OP put me on IGGY for having differing views and criticism for the thread in the first place. There are already tons of threads on these Mars anomalies and it is common courtesy to search for and then go to those threads to join the discussion in progress. Some of these pictures remind me of another series of threads which purported to have images of giant worms with human heads.

Point is if you have a new angle on a current discussion then by all means start a new thread. The constant bumping of this thread strikes me as grandiose. I'd like to hear more of MarsFanMags opinions in other threads. Burn me, flame me, ban my account if you wish but I really feel I must speak my mind on this.



posted on Sep, 21 2008 @ 06:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by stikkinikki The constant bumping of this thread strikes me as grandiose.


Why?
I just reply to what I see fit to reply to. This was a thread that I saw fit to reply to, if it bumped it along the way what's the problem? What does 'bumping' do anyway? Is it an allotter of points, because really that becomes petty and meaningless in the scheme of things...but then I keep forgetting that the internet is serious business!



posted on Sep, 21 2008 @ 07:12 PM
link   
reply to post by ChChKiwi
 


I agree with you on this one ChChKiwi, and mark you by the way as an e-friend for this ATS forum, hope OK with you. I think you are bright, and I don't bear any negative element from previous mayhem, as you gave me a good laugh (and vice-versa I think, perhaps) on some other thread...let me know,


A +

=A plus, put a dash on the "a" from upleft to downright, soz I got English keyboard,

Ka Kite Ano!

TC,
Mag



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Here is a very interesting site, by a book- writer, "Mars Findings", www.marsfindings.com...

www.marsfindings.com...

Here is the related video by the same person (over 9 minutes, so ArMaP, please don't watch it
)

Enjoy...



Title: "Artificial Structures on Mars?"

[edit on 24-9-2008 by MarsFanMag]



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 07:39 PM
link   
reply to post by MarsFanMag
 


If that video only has the same photos that we can see on the site then there is no reason for me to see it.



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 07:44 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Actually, ArMaP, I think you should take the time to see this video. I mean, how often do you get the chance to see a "brain in a crater" on Mars?

There are of course no sources/ID numbers given to any of the images in the video, but who cares when the entertainment value is so fantastic?




posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 07:51 PM
link   
reply to post by ziggystar60
 


9 minutes is too much for me to waste looking at photos I can see in just one or two minutes, just that, I think videos of still images is one of the most stupid uses for a medium that has as its special feature the fact that it shows moving images, it would be like using an aeroplane to go shopping two blocks away, terribly inefficient.



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 07:53 PM
link   
Hi ArmaP, just seen you've posted, we're staying up very late! I was just posting this other one for you before I go to bed.

Hee...Enjoy: "Buildings and walls?" I love the war music to it, could imagine an ancient war destroying all the cities there, freaky!

Title:"NASA found buildings" by Andromeda



I'll do edits tomorrow if I can. See you soon and thanx!



posted on Sep, 24 2008 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


I know what you mean. ArMaP, and I was just joking when I suggested that you should watch it. But believe me, it IS quite amusing. So if you ever have 9 minutes to waiste...




posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 12:52 PM
link   
Re-watching the St-Vincent area, as something like 2 skull-shapes had been previously spotted, down below these curious shapes I have found other very distinctive features.

^^We can see a JAR shape, perhaps water-works (the darker colouration on this terrain indicates that, either it is natural or artificial or both, water could have created this colouration);

^^we can see, beside the 'jar', a sprouting tube and another next to it, with the shape of a mini-hand (of course don't go looking for 5 fingers, ah ah);

^^we can see a V shape in the rock ( rock-edge surrounding a 'cave' or hole), on the bottom right (=LEFT on my edited photo), which is puzzling as indicates nothing natural;
It can also confirm a made way for water to be canalised;

^^we can see, further away accross this photo, further down on its left (=RIGHT on the photo), as I marked it, a flat surface in an sort of alcove. What surprises me with this flat surface is its geometry, and also, most strikingly, on its outer edge, a long smooth relief, which indicates its artificiality.

More of my edits for this area are available on the "Egyptian Statue on Mars?" thread.

It starts adding-up to a LOT of elements that, seen as a whole with the 'Statue", the 'skeleton' next to it, the clear paths, the 'stairs', the 'cut wall', all leading to the 'Statue', the 'flagging' remnants at the bottom of this Cape St.Vincent site, part of Victoria Crater walls, point to their artificiality.




posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 06:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by MarsFanMag
It starts adding-up to a LOT of elements that, seen as a whole with the 'Statue", the 'skeleton' next to it, the clear paths, the 'stairs', the 'cut wall', all leading to the 'Statue', the 'flagging' remnants at the bottom of this Cape St.Vincent site, part of Victoria Crater walls, point to their artificiality.
There is where I disagree with you.


The fact that you see the "skeleton", and you consider all things artificial (like the paths, the "stairs", the "cut wall" and the "flagging" does not point to any artificiality.

At most, it points to a possibility (and I don't even think that this is the case).



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Mmh, OK, you are REALLY determined to think, that this site presents nothing but geological normality, to you, the statue is is 'normal rock', the paths are just 'normal natural ways', as far as I can sum it up, so I presume that everything else, like the smooth flat surface in the sort of alcove I point to, or the JAR-shape, or anything else would seem perfectly normal, as natural, to you...well it's you, isn't it, it's your conviction, your way of not willing to open your mind to: how else, what else could it be?

It's YOUR People, Portuguese, who eventually helped to, once and for good, prove that this Earth wasn't flat... it was seen first by Pythagoras
...if you search on Wikipedia at "Spherical Earth", it will repeat and expand my knowledge of this to you. An Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, him with the famous Maths Theorem, SHOWED that the Earth was round, and lead the path to else...truths that ARE TRUTHS NOW, it took a change of MILLENNIUM!

...but it's only via Portuguese famous Scientists and Navigators, Sailors that it was proven this way, to the BROAD PUBLIC who was still in DOUBT!!! LOL!!!!, hundreds of YEARS after Pythagoras had attempted to prove it. HE had, really, but what happened in the mean-while? Discussion forums, LIVE?

A lot of people show things that really exist. On YOU TUBE VIDEOS included.
Perhaps when we turn our TVs OFF we start being calm...away from all this so deeply anchored system we grew up with... I like my calm and silent. Here at this time no-one can tell me what to believe, since I'm on my own, with my sleeping cat and my Friend, Silence!

If you disbelieve all of it, you'd look so stubborn... I see, watch plenty of discoveries, now is the time to show what we see. If I doubt a thing, I will ask questions, if the thing is a hoax I will react to it, badly. My and others' things are no hoax. The references or findings I give HERE are SERIOUS.

The fact you start seeing similarities with the pre-Inca mount I showed on "Egyptian Startue on Mars?"-- same topic, St VINCENT site, which I do recognise and respect as a CEMETARY, should start telling you to stop, systematically as you do, DENYING these findings, because, honestly, it starts making you look like one of these stale sceptics who were ADAMANT that the Earth was flat, just to get good points from their political party...

My last attempt of answer with you ArMaP, I'm afraid, reply the same stereotyped way and that'll be it for me,

For you talk about time we waste!

[edit on 26-9-2008 by MarsFanMag]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 08:07 PM
link   
From Wiki:




Classical Mediterranean Pythagoras Early Greek philosophers alluded to a spherical earth, though with some ambiguity.[3] This idea influenced Pythagoras (b. 570 BCE), who saw harmony in the universe and sought to explain it. He reasoned that Earth and the other planets must be spheres, since the most harmonious geometric solid form is a sphere[1]. After the fifth century BCE, no Greek writer of repute thought the world was anything but round.[3]



posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by MarsFanMag

The truth is, very few if any educated people believed the Earth was flat. Christopher Columbus did not sail to prove the world was round, he knew it was round, those that sponsored his voyages knew it was round, almost everyone knew it was round. Columbus didn't even sail all the way. Magellan did sail around the world but not to prove that it was round. Again, it was accepted that the world was round.

You need to use better logic than, "Skeptics thought the world was flat and they were wrong. You think these are natural features, so I am right".

[edit on 26-9-2008 by Phage]



posted on Sep, 27 2008 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by MarsFanMag
Mmh, OK, you are REALLY determined to think, that this site presents nothing but geological normality, to you, the statue is is 'normal rock', the paths are just 'normal natural ways', as far as I can sum it up, so I presume that everything else, like the smooth flat surface in the sort of alcove I point to, or the JAR-shape, or anything else would seem perfectly normal, as natural, to you...well it's you, isn't it, it's your conviction, your way of not willing to open your mind to: how else, what else could it be?
I am not determined to think anything (maybe that is the biggest difference between us), what I think about those photos is based in the way I interpret what I see, the only determination I have is in looking for more data, only with good can we reach any conclusion.

The elements of which the "statue" is composed do not look different from other similar features on that site.

The "body", although the only one of its kind that I can see on that photo, is just a flat area of the rock, it does not show any sign of artificiality or anything impossible or even rare in nature.

The "head" looks like a piece of rock broken from that area above the "body", by changing the "head" with the piece of rock next to it you may see better what I mean.


The "paths", to me, look nothing more than fissures on the rocks (that could be a name for a drink
), like the one on the top, also a zigzag fissure.


The "smooth flat surface" is just that, why should it be artificial?

The "jar-shape" looks more like a result of different colours creating the idea of that shape than the shape itself, the darker area is not darker because it is rounded and gets less light, it's darker because it has some of that blueish dust on it, and that is visible on a false colour image, even if this image is smaller than the super-resolution image. *


And I don't see it as a lack of willingness to open my mind, I am just not willing to jump to any conclusion just because things would be more interesting if that conclusion was the reality, I make my conclusions based on the data I have.


An Ancient Greek, Pythagoras, him with the famous Maths Theorem, SHOWED that the Earth was round, and lead the path to else...truths that ARE TRUTHS NOW, it took a change of MILLENNIUM!
I know that experiment, and it shows how a brilliant mind can appear at any place at any time, it only needs an opportunity to shine, and those ancient Greeks had plenty of opportunities.

It also shows that we should try to find ways of proving our theories right or wrong, just creating a theory does not advance our knowledge, seeing that it is right or wrong is what really matters.


A lot of people show things that really exist. On YOU TUBE VIDEOS included.
I do not doubt that the things are there, I doubt that those things are what people say they are, and the evidences shown by everyone I have seen do not really prove that their interpretation is right.


Perhaps when we turn our TVs OFF we start being calm...away from all this so deeply anchored system we grew up with... I like my calm and silent. Here at this time no-one can tell me what to believe, since I'm on my own, with my sleeping cat and my Friend, Silence!
I only watch Euronews while I take my breakfast, besides that I only use TV to see movies and cartoons (yes, I am a cartoon fan
).

And although I prefer to hear music to silence, I also have a sleepy cat.


If you disbelieve all of it, you'd look so stubborn...
And you do not look stubborn by not believing those things are natural? Where is the line between stubbornness and persistence? Am I stubborn because my ideas are not the same as yours? Do you think that if the situation was reversed you would consider myself as stubborn because I believed in the artificiality of those things?


I see, watch plenty of discoveries, now is the time to show what we see. If I doubt a thing, I will ask questions, if the thing is a hoax I will react to it, badly. My and others' things are no hoax. The references or findings I give HERE are SERIOUS.
I also see those "discoveries", and I also ask questions to clear my doubts, but I ask questions about everything because I doubt everything, the only difference is that I find less reasons to doubt that those are natural features than reasons to doubt its artificiality.


The fact you start seeing similarities with the pre-Inca mount I showed on "Egyptian Startue on Mars?"-- same topic, St VINCENT site, which I do recognise and respect as a CEMETARY, should start telling you to stop, systematically as you do, DENYING these findings, because, honestly, it starts making you look like one of these stale sceptics who were ADAMANT that the Earth was flat, just to get good points from their political party...
I did not start seeing similarities, I see those similarities in almost all photos posted on ATS or on (the few) YouTube videos I see, but seeing similarities does not mean that things are what they look like. The fact that an egg is similar to a ping-pong ball does not mean it is a ping-pong ball.

And, as I said, I do not deny the findings, I just not agree with the interpretation (and we should remember that what we can really discuss is just our interpretation of what we see, we do not have physical evidences to discuss). Your interpretation of that site as a cemetery, for example, is based in the similarities of some things you saw and from which you created a theory that that site was (or is) a cemetery. You based that theory in what you saw, and that does not make it better or worse than what anyone else thinks that site is, it's just a theory based mostly in imagination (you do not have any real evidence of buried bodies there, and that is what would make it a cemetery, right?) and interpretation of similarities with things you know.

The fact that you have ignored all my references that show that those slab-like stones are everywhere on the area where Opportunity is and not just on that "pathway" to the inside of Victoria crater can bee seen as a denying of the data that is available but that shows that you may be wrong, and it may make some people think that this is the reason why you ignore it.


My last attempt of answer with you ArMaP, I'm afraid, reply the same stereotyped way and that'll be it for me
OK, if that is your reaction to people who try to show you that there is another possibility than the one you think the best, fine by me, but don't expect me to stop posting just because you don't like it.

Too bad you have come to that position, I think your knowledge could only improve if you changed your atitude just a little.

* A word about the super-resolution image, this method creates new artifacts on the image because it uses several images to try to create a better, bigger image. Any noise will be also used to create a better image, creating things that are only on one of the photos used.



posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 07:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by MarsFanMag

The truth is, very few if any educated people believed the Earth was flat. Christopher Columbus did not sail to prove the world was round, he knew it was round, those that sponsored his voyages knew it was round, almost everyone knew it was round. Columbus didn't even sail all the way. Magellan did sail around the world but not to prove that it was round. Again, it was accepted that the world was round.

You need to use better logic than, "Skeptics thought the world was flat and they were wrong. You think these are natural features, so I am right".

[edit on 26-9-2008 by Phage]


Oh THAT, excuse me Sir, but what you state is a massive LIE. Just like you lied about Van FLANDERN, it was NOT 2001, it was 2006. NO. Before even the Portuguese set to SEAS, and Oceans, and to the Last South Cape in Africa, (ooops...AND didn't FALL DOWN!!!!), a large MAJORITY of this world actually BELIEVED, still, that the Eart was FLAT. No one could remember Pythagoras, if they did, it was a few, and they were either very scared of getting burnt, or hiding the fact for their own holy benefits.

It's a bit like nowadays and the Maddy-case. This poor little Child is away, far far away to a place where we will ALL be, the difference being, we will have had a life in between. It takes ONE Portuguese person to expose the truth. And how brave, given that he had no 'sponsors' as you call the PT authorities at the time of Columbus.

_____________________Group reply:

I rarely come to here anymore, as frankly I am so disappointed by the constant bashing of my ideas.


(round of applause)


I took opportunity to finish the read of "Nineteen Eighty-Four" by lucidly intelligent George ORWELL.

Funnilly enough, or is it funny, now in 2008, --definitely going the way Orwell foresaw--re DEAD IRAQI CHILDREN, DEAD MOTHERS, DEAD FATHERS, DEAD FAMILIES, clear patterns appear in both cases, Madeleine McCann and Mars. (and Iraq /"EastAsia/ Eurasia" and all)
Surely as I can myself see, these patterns also appear here and there and everywhere. Curiously the "giant apple state" (copyright=ME) is never too far away out of that road. Curiously it's the country that allows private firearms... erm....I LOVE MICKEY....but just shoot me, that's "OK"....my Kids or others might shoot you back.


It was NEVER "accepted that the world was round", as you state, so wrongly,!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not more than the concept of real justice for a defenseless 3 years-old Child was accepted, but rather denied and blanked-out, for the benefit of ONE party, a political one, and the party that it obeys, this being still, very much 'unclear' but, pretty much mentioned everywhere in the world, when talked about.

"Freedom is slavery" and, should I add, Justice is silence, black-outs are normal, especially in photography, and by extension, photoshopping. "Doublethink" is the key, but hopefully after us, when we are long dead, our great-grand-Children will remember their parents mention the one in the family who did try for Children's Justice, and for the Truth on Mars, for example. And I think that, is freedom of speech is not replaced by torture, MANY great-grand Children will remember, this way, their Great-GrandMahs/Pahs, who patiently tried to put a word in, and bravely went to demonstrations in the streets, and consciously exposed the 'white' governments with almighty Europe, and the Illluminati, the free~masons, Buildeberg and the neo-NAZIS, etc, on the Net while they (still?) could.
And Oh, the Paid posters, every little helping.

Now seriously I have other fish to fry. I love my Kids, always will do, my People, my Friends, and Maddy, and I still love Mars, Space, Books, but I dislike internet more and more, so, bye from me....I don't know if I'll bother putting any other finding onto this thread I started, I will certainly carry on searching, but will I waste time putting my results ponto here....I doubt.

Thanx to a lot of you who can raise a glass to their "victory"...make sure you drink "Victory Gin"...or other posh wines paid by your political~\protectors\...it might help to carry on stamping on free ideas...you lot might very well win against liberty of thinking, the forums are here to warn and censore anyone who defends themselves in a legimimate cause.(see my censored-post by mod maria-stardust...but did she censore the other one? I cant see, I've pressed the ignore button on this mod-dear friend)

To your little powers, human thoughts and behaviour will always prevail, sorry, you won't be able to copyright for your own causes MY edits and findings any longer, hooray.

Use and abuse as usual...........I and others WILL remember you.......

Bonne nuit, bonne semaine, bonne annee & joyeux Noel a tous. Altogether now, Sing a Song!
:lol



posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 09:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by MarsFanMag


Oh THAT, excuse me Sir, but what you state is a massive LIE. Just like you lied about Van FLANDERN, it was NOT 2001, it was 2006. NO. Before even the Portuguese set to SEAS, and Oceans, and to the Last South Cape in Africa, (ooops...AND didn't FALL DOWN!!!!), a large MAJORITY of this world actually BELIEVED, still, that the Eart was FLAT. No one could remember Pythagoras, if they did, it was a few, and they were either very scared of getting burnt, or hiding the fact for their own holy benefits.

It's a bit like nowadays and the Maddy-case. This poor little Child is away, far far away to a place where we will ALL be, the difference being, we will have had a life in between. It takes ONE Portuguese person to expose the truth. And how brave, given that he had no 'sponsors' as you call the PT authorities at the time of Columbus.



I don't know a lot about the customs of France, but in most countries falsely calling someone a liar is considered an extreme personal insult. Don't ask me to excuse you for that because I will not.

This is in the opening credits to Van Flandern's silly presentation:

Artificial Structures on Mars
Tom Van Flandern Meta Research, Washington, DC
Hotel New Yorker Crystal Room - May 8, 2001

But I suppose you are too stupid or narrowminded to pay attention to annoying little details like that. But you see, I did waste my time watching that video. I do know what the words said. I did pay attention to it, as difficult as it was to resist just turning it off. I do know the video is a collection of distorted facts, intentional misdirection, and nonsense.

You are the one who first mentioned the courageous Portuguese sailors, bravely proving that the world is round when in fact what they were doing was looking for a shorter way to get to the Indies, a cheaper way to make more money. You are wrong about the majority of people in the during the Renaissance (yes, Columbus sailed during the Renaissance) thinking the world was flat. But for you it is enough to believe that you are right. What historians tell us, what written records tell us, is all irrelevant if it conflicts with your little view of the way things are or the way things should be, in your little mind. I don't know what "PT authorities" are but if Columbus had not had someone to furnish him with his three little boats he never would have made his voyages. Do you think his officers and crews thought they would fall off the edge of the Earth? Do you think they were all slaves, forced to be part of the voyage? Before you speak of history you should learn something of it.

I'm very impressed that you read a book. You've pointed out several times that you read it. I read that book (1984) when I was thirteen years old and that was quite a while before the year 1984. I've read a lot more books before and since but don't expect me to list them. I fail to see any relationship between what Orwell wrote and what you have had to say on this or any other thread.

Next you bring up the sad story of a missing child. What on Earth does that have to do with anything you have been talking about? Are you capable of putting two thoughts together in a coherent manner?

You are so terribly offended when someone points out that there are other explanations to the things your little imagination comes up with, that you cry "LIAR". Is your own opinion of so little value to yourself that you cannot stand to even allow someone else to have another opinion? Everyone must agree with you? Everyone must validate you? If that is the case you are right, you do not belong on ATS. If you make claims such as you have and expect everyone to say "ooooh, wonderful! You're right! It is undeniable!" you are, no doubt, in the wrong place. One can only hope that your silly little thread will fade away as well as you. But somehow I doubt either will happen.

Christmas is a few months off.

Aloha

[edit on 28-9-2008 by Phage]



posted on Sep, 28 2008 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


OK, Phage, I'm not stupid, I'm not narrow minded.

The things I try here are things I wonder about.

2 sorts of things, as you can reckon, because you are a very intelligent person.

1)Things I reckon being UN-natural = ARTIFICIAL.

Some people try to post error photos to try and pass me as an imbecile.

I am no imbecile. Unless or until I am diagonocised with mental debility syndroms or symptoms I am not or never have been a idiot. Equally I do not register in the medical authorities of France or Uk as a mentally disable, and people like this get all my sympathy and support.

It's no-one's fault if anyone is clinically classified with these mentions and they do still deserve/(I don't like the word 'deserve' in this case, so here's another word
HAVE THE RIGHT to be happy.

So, Things I reckon being UN-natural = ARTIFICIAL.
They are a few, as fa as I could research, on Mars. Yet they ARE there. The PATHS on St.Vincent, are clearly recognised as such, by thousands of us.

The statue.

The being (I say, respected former Being in the shape of Skeleton, Bones and Embellishment, symbolic embellishment as we see for our Own or for the egyptian Mommies for example), NEXT to the Statue,

(Re: LEE_K posts & Photo- Edits, my Edits & YT video)

PATHS, STATUE, and ELSE WE FOUND.

THE WRITTEN SYMBOLS ON THE PEDESTAL OF THE OTHER STATUE, WEST VALLEY.

______________________

2) anything that could be anything, and I don't say they are, such or such, just because I print a photo (or look at one) it doesn't mean that, 'AAAAHHH!!! HERE WE GO!!! ANOTHER ARTIFICIAL PROOF!!!', NO.

--> NO.

It doesn't.

I just put these for DISCUSSION.

THAT is STILL allowed, isn't it.
Gosh have 3 quarters of Humanity lost the way of a pleasant discussion?

If so, you still have the right to mumble on your own you now, just do it in your bathroom or something, dont do it while you walk on the pavements, you could be taken away to some hospital dpt...

Talk, Peopke, Talk!

It's sane TALKING you know!



posted on Sep, 29 2008 @ 01:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by MarsFanMag
reply to post by Phage
 



Some people try to post error photos to try and pass me as an imbecile.


I will not comment on most of your rather hysterical post. But I think that you should apologize for this particular statement to everyone who has actually been very helpful, polite and almost unbelievable patient towards you in this thread.
This is a serious accusation, and if you are unable to apologize for it, I suggest that you stop posting at all here at ATS.

[edit on 29-9-2008 by ziggystar60]




top topics



 
3
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join