posted on Sep, 2 2008 @ 01:13 PM
Some say the world is crowded population wise. Some say the world isnt crowded population wise. Which side do you lean toward? Have any facts about
The thuth of the matter is: the world's systems and functions and markets and check out lanes (lol) are crowded with ppl. That's what makes the
world crowded. When you cant get in to get a job anywhere = the world is crowded, even if it aint population wise in a poorly backed claim. The thing
that is overlooked and not given a name or label are things (both needed and used by ppl) to a population that are taken up and filled to the brim of
capacity, so to speak.
What good is no over-pupulation of ppl to areas if the the world, in other ways, is crowded in an under "thing-ulation" way? The thing can be
a market, a function, a check out lane (lol), a system, and/or a etc.
What do you think though?
And should they make "thingulation" or rather "pop-thingulation" a modern word?
Imagine one day where you have to pay just to stand in a 'moving gradually down' line of a check out lane or a 'moving gradually down' line at the
secretary of state or etc., besides whatever the point is you're in it for... The money would prolly be used toward adding to the available capacity
to what is under pop-thingulated. If over pop-thingulated, then things go down suddenly to you such as a line you're in in waiting to be served.
So should the world maximize its capacities to etc for the claimed not over population?
The first thing that comes to mind when you think "over population" is the crowdedness of area. Area you first think is land area. Those are your
first mistaken thought! There is more than "area" alone or rather more areas than land that can be over populated. Example: "In what
areas is the market strong?" Surely there are other kinds of areas besides land that the population to is overlooked or not looked at at
Bottomline is: Crowdedness is the number 1 economic and social problem.
[edit on 2-9-2008 by Mabus]