Sarah Palin's VP Selection Is A Trojan Horse, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 101 times


reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 10:25 PM by merky
reply to post by mister.old.school




.......and what if she don't want to play that game. She's got a big head right now. Well, perhaps she gets a BIG payoff, $$$$$$$$$$$$$ for being a player.

All in all this is turning out to be a ZOO.

It's no wonder why I hate politics....



reply posted on 2-9-2008 @ 11:42 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



modernized his campaign, but not himself. it's just the same old republican drivel they've been throwing down the assembly line since 'dubya' and his gunslingers came into town.


reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 12:42 AM by Hal9000
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


reply to
post by jsobecky


I doubt the scenario you envision, but I will say that Lieberman will probably be a top level cabinet member. such as Secretary of State, in the McCain administration. And he would be an excellent choice, imo.


Without a doubt Lieberman may be a part of a McCain administration if one comes into being, but having Lieberman as SOS? The one in charge of foreign affairs?

Knowing Lieberman's true nature as a lobbyist for Israel, and having him in a McCain administration will be worst than "more of the same". Not only will big oil be running the show in Washington, now we will have Israel calling the shots in Foreign Affairs for the next four years.

This is exactly what we don't need anymore. You want to defend Israel? Then move over there and do it. That is not American. What ever happened to taking care of our own?

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 01:53 AM by undo
reply to post by proximo



could you please refrain from calling other americans idiots? (that goes for everyone in this thread). no one here is an idiot. no one out there is an idiot. stop the partisan bickering. we all vote or prepare to vote, our conscience and our wallets. this is a fact of life. you can't ignore the people on either side of the issues, which is why we have a amalgam of democratic/republican social programs and programs related to democratic/republican ideals. these serve to represent our nation as a whole. neither side tries to remove the other side's programs because they don't get put in place to begin with, without a lot of bipartisan agreement. thus, we aren't going to see the end of abortion or welfare or social security just because a lady from alaska is a vp candidate.

please, you people way over exaggerate everything. i still am in shock over that entire jesusland map fiasco. how can you possibly hope for voters when you're insulting them constantly? do you think people are masochists or what? you don't have my permission to call me an idiot every other day, just because i hold some conservative positions. so i'm not the masochist you're looking for. and i have a sneakin' feeling, alot of others aren't either.


reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 02:11 AM by silo13
reply to post by jamie83



McCain/Palin = real change you can count on!

Obama/Biden = same old Washington politics.


You might want to edit your post - you got it backwards.




...typo's made by the best of us... lol

[edit on 3-9-2008 by silo13]


reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 02:12 AM by Cowgirlstraitup7
reply to post by undo



Wow, you really seem to have your panties in a bunch. Listen, I am a woman, I am a mother of three beautiful children, I lived in Alaska for three years (during the Reagan administration), and I would not dream of voting for McCain because he picked a woman for his VP. Just because we both have vagina's doesn't mean I am an idiot. This is not about glass ceilings or any other feminist bs. This is about who can run this country into the ground slowest (if you believe all the conspiracy theories out there about NWO, etc).

When I first read the OP, I immediately thought about Bush's Supreme Court Justice nominee and how she dropped out just days later. This has got to be the most irrational thing I have seen McCain do.


reply posted on 3-9-2008 @ 02:31 AM by undo
reply to post by Cowgirlstraitup7



first of all, leave my undergarments out of the discussion.
next, it has everything to do with a woman in office. allow me to refresh your memory, but they trounced hillary just recently too, and she was the most experienced of them all. sarah could have years of experience too, but it wouldn't mean squat because there will be no woman in the white house unless we force the issue.

there's a reason why we can't get a woman in the white house here, and it's partly related to who wields the most power over our nation (foreign oil). ever read frank herbert's DUNE? think of oil like the spice. it's a commodity that only exists in one place in that universe, but that's not so for us. we have oil, too. i've been studying the economy, very closely, for many years now. i've went through hundreds of alternative fuel sources, their patents and supporting documents/websites. i couldn't figure out what the problem was, and why we weren't going to these alternative fuel sources, for a very long time.

then it dawned on me. first, we need to get energy independence. if we don't get it, we will be slowly starved to death by our own politicians. i think sarah has a pretty good plan and the ability to deliver. once we are independent, we can switch to whatever kind of alternative energy sources we want and pioneer that technology all over the planet. it's a viable solution, and certainly better than keeping it the way it is now because the current plan is to increase the prices on everything even more over the next 5 years.

when carter was in office, he tried to get us off foreign oil and he paid dearly for it. we need energy independence so bad, it's obvious to everyone but the guys who attached themselves to the foreign oil wells, intravenously. we don't need some guys in another country determining the value of our women. some of the guys supporting obama are getting the wrong idea entirely. like..white women are ho's, for example. no, i will not agree to that. i don't agree to women being called ho's, regardless
sorry.




[edit on 3-9-2008 by undo]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 10 days ago with 59 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags
White House pressure on Gulf oil leak figures
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags