Sarah Palin's VP Selection Is A Trojan Horse, page 12

Pages: << 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 101 times

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:18 AM by Sheridan

reply to post by Freakaloin

Maybe, but I guess you're a Jew or a brainwashed who is believing in Israel and you believe that I will buy that nonsense what you're telling. Here is the bad news. These times are over, when we're going to ever believe to Israel or the supporters of Israel. No more U.S. blood for that country.

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:30 AM by Freakaloin

there you go again. i'm not a jew and i think the state of israel should not even exist. but yet you seem to 'believe' otherwise...

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:31 AM by theblunttruth

Originally posted by Sheridan
reply to post by Freakaloin

Do you really believe in that? Palin was the one who blew the monopoly in Alaska. They're living for the U.S., not for Israel. You may call them as patriots. McCain is a military guy, I admit, but Palin's children are serving in the navy. She is maybe the only one, whose family members are fighting in Iraq. Do you believe that a mommy will let that her career to endanger her children, especially for a country, which is not worth an American life, not even an American dollar (This was said by an ex-CIA member and I agree with him.)? So, think again.

Edit: Freakaloin. It's better if you check again, because the U.S. is a christian state. It always was. The Jews are usually like to say this, because they believe they can convince people that their own country is for everyone and everyone must follow the Jews. Nah. The U.S. is a christian country and if the Jews doesn't like this, pack into the luggage and leave the U.S. for a lifetime. Those ones, be any of the religions, whose want to live in free and accept that the U.S. is a christian nation, they're gladly welcomed and they may stay. But the U.S. majority is not going to change for some minority. Accept this fact.

[edit on 4-9-2008 by Sheridan]

That is absolute tripe!! "everyone must follow the jews", do you actually know any Jews? I mean take a look at the only real "jewish state", Israel. It's secular, their religon isn't forced by any means. More anti-semetic nonsense. I think you have Judaism confused with Islam.

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:36 AM by Freakaloin

sorry the facts hurt this dude so much...he argues against reality and thinks he is winning...lol

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:37 AM by Sheridan

That is absolute tripe!! "everyone must follow the jews", do you actually know any Jews? I mean take a look at the only real "jewish state", Israel. It's secular, their religon isn't forced by any means. More anti-semetic nonsense. I think you have Judaism confused with Islam.

Yes, I know many, Israelis, non-Israelis, Zionists and non-Zionists. The first group, the Zionists are intending to destroy every Christian, because they believe that Jews are the rightful rulers of the planet and the Christians are standing only in their way to do that. They're intending to make a nice melting pot about the U.S., destroy all cultural traits and making it dependent from the Zionist banking and media system. A Zionist said to me, because he believed I was one too.

Well, he mistaken.

And the second group, whose are not accepting the state of Israel at all, not supporting the senseless lies and delusions what the Zionists are doing. They're the good Jews.

And no. I didn't confused Judaism with Islam. I know many people whose religion is Islam and I had quite less problem with them, then the Jews (With the exception of the good ones, whose has moral values, what the Zionists don't have at all.).

Freakaloin. Winning against your one liner answers, where you not explained anything at all? Even a monkey can do that.

No offense, but until you cannot explain yourself, you're not a match to me.

[edit on 4-9-2008 by Sheridan]

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:38 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by Freakaloin
conservatives attack ppl all the time for having kids out of wedlock. i smell hypocrisy...

hey if her husband wants to quit his job and stay home with the kids then everything would be cool...around here we look down on ppl who abandon their kids for their careers. especially ppl who could easily live off of one spouses income. it's called child abuse and being a selfish parent...shows lack of character.

no, we suggest that liberal permissiveness leads to acceptance of teenage mums as the norm, which it should not be. her daughter was a consumer of liberal agenda presented to our children in our culture, why shouldnt she be affected like all the other kids?

to suggest that a woman cannot have a career and be a mom is ridiculous... having a career is not child abandonment... how very ironic of you to suggest as much...

now thats what i call hypocrisy!

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:43 AM by TheComte

What are everyone's thoughts on the fact that she tried to have books banned as mayor of Wasilla, and even fired the librarian when she resisted? No big deal?

www.nytimes.com...

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 09:44 AM by Freakaloin

Originally posted by feydrautha

to suggest that a woman cannot have a career and be a mom is ridiculous... having a career is not child abandonment... how very ironic of you to suggest as much...

wow u read right thru my point and kept on going. sure she can have a career and be a mom...i didn't suggest that. but if the dad isn't going to stay home with the kids...especially when they have the financial means...then it is child abandonment. to top it off tig has special needs with his condition. sad...

my wife and i have both swapped out sacrificing our careers with different kids to have one of us stay home with the them...i'm sure with much less income...

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:02 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by Freakaloin
really? here's a fact check...
www.cbsnews.com...
r u going to respond with "the liberal media is the devil!"?

of course there is no liberal bias in the media:

nothing to see here, lets move along....

now if only obama would actually say something substantive, so we can fact check him... which has yet to be done...

but they're all over palin, eh?
Media Bias 101

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:08 AM by Freakaloin

US magazine is the media for u?...uhm okay...

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:12 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by Freakaloin

like i said...anyways...you can check it out yourself. her speech was full of lies.

who put that together? mr. accurate; dan rather?

nah, i see its just some blogger... or op-ed schmoe offering assumptions and half truths as his only form of rebuttal for the devestating attack on his messiah, b hussein obama.

Obama's accomplishments in the Senate here. They include the Lugar-Obama bill on nonproliferation, and an ethics reform package that the Washington Post called "the strongest ethics legislation to emerge from Congress yet.

thats it? compared to running a town, and a state? no comparison... she's better qualified to be president than obama... as was hillary.

but hey, those foam columns must have impressed someone, eh? ha ha! no substance, only symbolism.

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:12 AM by Sheridan

reply to post by feydrautha

Of course not. The media never choose their favorite and you photoshoped these covers.

Liar media. I hate them.

Do you know what is the main trick in any of the elections in the 21st century? Vote for the other party that is in the media's favor. Right now the media's favorite is Obama and Biden. So the logical and the only best choice is to vote for McCain and Palin. If they hate them, because they're not serving THEIR goals, we must love and support them. I never was a McCain fan, but since the Media is against him and Palin, I reconsidered this a bit. Why the media is hate them? Because they're not supporting Israel and rather intending to serve the U.S.? Oh, my god! These are my candidates.

You must remember, that the media is always choosing those ones as favorites, whose are supporting their favorite terror state Israel and the Jews. Let me remind you, that the U.S. is not a Jewland and not Israel at all. As Americans you must vote for YOUR future and not for Israel's future.

[edit on 4-9-2008 by Sheridan]

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:17 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by Freakaloin
US magazine is the media for u?...uhm okay...

Unsurprisingly, Us Weekly's publisher Jann Wenner, who also publishes the equally contemptible Rolling Stone, is a big Obama donor.

Us and Rolling Stone mag are probably so obscure and unkown that i'm not surprised you've never heard of them...

i'm certain they're persuasive to only a very few people who even know about those publications...

and i just bet they are the only examples of liberal agenda driven bias in issues presentation, right?

riIIiIiIiIiiIiiIiight....

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:20 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by TheComte
What are everyone's thoughts on the fact that she tried to have books banned as mayor of Wasilla, and even fired the librarian when she resisted? No big deal?

www.nytimes.com...

thats all you have? talk about digging....

i heard her hairdresser got a parking ticket in 1978

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:30 AM by undo

Originally posted by feydrautha

of course there is no liberal bias in the media:

wow...
you sure nailed that one. is no one worried about this dramatic difference in reporting?

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:45 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by undo
wow...
you sure nailed that one. is no one worried about this dramatic difference in reporting?

thanks, the same people who roll their eyes at the mention of fox news are the ones who eagerly gobble up what their 'mainstream media' spoon feeds them...

the ones worried about are generally known as conservative types, who recognise the bias and fail to succumb to the relentless propaganda...

for instance, i'm very conservative, but my main news sources are npr, bbc and local socialist rags... i've never heard a rush limbaugh show, (but i do love ann coulter and try to grab a column when i'm able to)

but for the most part, liberal media is what i consume, it gives me perspective...

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:46 AM by VitriolAndAngst

Originally posted by Jemison
reply to post by SonicInfinity

Obama said strictly that family members are OFF-LIMITS. If it turns out that Sarah Palin resigns due to much negative media coverage, the Democrats won't be to blame.

What?!?!? OBAMA may have said that, but his supporters are NOT backing off!!! Take a look at all of the left wing blog sites - they are STILL saying that Trig is Bristol's son, not Sarah Palin's!!

And while I respect Obama coming out and saying family members are off limits, I'm still waiting for Biden to open his big mouth and stick his foot in it! Keeping mum on this situation is probably the hardest thing he's had to do in his entire life!

Jemison

The candidate has no control over the Media, or what individual bloggers do.

I really don't know what you expect would be different when you give everyone 15 minutes to get to know the next potential VP, and then a day later, we find she traveled 14 hours after her water broke, has a daughter with a kid out of wedlock after preaching against sex education and choice -- oh, and she was working with Ted Stephens on some of that embezzling and pork.

I haven't heard too many comments over the top -- we have the same speculation in the tabloids about Brad and Jennifer. Palin is on the record chastising Hillary for whining about being under the media microscope -- so hey, you want to be an unknown VP? Then get ready for a tough week.

It's a little premature to opine about Palin's treatment. It's not like she is a Liberal Journalist at the Republican Convention who have been thrown in jail by the truckload.

>> But again, Obama is the candidate and he has nothing to do with the Media frenzy.

Karl Rove, bugged his own office to help him win an election, and he was meeting with the leader of Georgia -- most likely to push him to provoke Russia so that they could sell more weapons to former Soviet buffer states. I put nothing past him. Did you notice that they put the Governor of Alabama in Federal prison on trumped up charges? Rove's fingerprints are all over that.

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 10:52 AM by feydrautha

Originally posted by TheComte
What are everyone's thoughts on the fact that she tried to have books banned as mayor of Wasilla, and even fired the librarian when she resisted? No big deal?

www.nytimes.com...

let's see if i can do better than that:

i dunno, what do you think?

Not all of the remarkable proclamations of the Obamessiah are read off a teleprompter.

Nobama Fashion Statement

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 12:14 PM by spuddyboy

ok. So what if none of this comes to pass? I dont think anything like this will happen. Just saying. If it does I'll say sorry. 2 weeks you say? Well i guess we will need to just wait and see

reply posted on 4-9-2008 @ 12:20 PM by TheComte

reply to post by feydrautha

What do you mean "do better?" If you are insinuating that doing drugs is worse than banning books then I couldn't disagree more. In fact, it's pretty ridiculous.

So you think it's good that she tried to ban books? Nazis banned books, didn't they? Banning books kind of goes against the notion of a free society, does it not? I guess it's not surprising that the Republicans chose her, since they are currently swinging the US dangerously close to fascism. She'll definitely help their cause then. Good luck!