First of all let me say that it is the job of ANY elected official to vigorously represent his/her constituents. Thus securing funds for those Gov.
Palin represents is in fact her job.
ST. PAUL, Minn., Sept. 1 -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700
residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.
There was $500,000 for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, $900,000 for sewer repairs, and $15 million for a rail project -- all
intended to benefit Palin's town, Wasilla, located about 45 miles north of Anchorage.
However, we have been bombarded by the McCain/Palin campaign about how Gov. Palin is a "maverick" such as himself, fighting for the small guy
against special interests.
McCain's crusade against earmarks -- federal spending sought by members of Congress to benefit specific projects -- has been a hallmark of his
campaign. He has said earmarks are wasteful and are often inserted into bills with little oversight, sometimes by a single powerful lawmaker.
Palin has also railed against earmarks, touting her opposition to a $223 million bridge in the state as a prime credential for the vice presidential
nomination. "As governor, I've stood up to the old politics-as-usual, to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the
good-ol'-boy network," she said Friday.
Washington Post
It seems that Gov. Palin has in fact no qualms about "earmarks".
Like I said above, if a politician is honest about it, I personally tend to not care about "earmarks". In many ways it is naive to believe that the
world would work any different way.
To me this issue is yet another example of the GOP doing an atrocious job vetting Gov Palin. Everyday now it's another piece of information that the
GOP has to spin/work around. It really is hard to believe that there was not ONE other qualified person to nominate as VP who would have appeased
their extreme right constituents without having to cope with daily controversy.
Edit to add: I know some want to talk "accents" and "grandkids" but can we please try to stay on topic of an ACTUAL issue.
[edit on 9/2/2008 by schrodingers dog]