It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
What price the ghost in the machine now?
The thing moves and makes decisions on its own, without any external direction. It can learn. It has a will of its own.
Belief in the existence of a nonphysical entity called 'mind' or 'spirit' takes another hit. How long now, before it's holed below the waterline and sinks without trace?
does it make you even just a little bit sad?
or are you that anxious to be rid of it?
meantime - we should discuss the meaning of the word "will"
Apart from its lack of agreement with reality, yours is a superb intellectual performance - Albert Einstein
Originally posted by Astyanax
No, Spriamirabilis, it doesn't. The world is overflowing with beauty, complexity and awe-inspiring wonder just as it is. There is no need to gild the lily by importing nonexistent magical entities into it.
Another nonexistent magical entity.
Originally posted by an0maly33
amazing stuff. i personally draw the line at emotion or sentience. if it starts getting feelings or becoming self-aware then we've gone too far.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
No, Spriamirabilis, it doesn't. The world is overflowing with beauty, complexity and awe-inspiring wonder just as it is. There is no need to gild the lily by importing nonexistent magical entities into it.
Yes, actually I am. The sooner we boot out this nonsensical palaver of gods and souls, the sooner we shall be able to get properly to grips with our real problems and potentials.
Another nonexistent magical entity. I posted this on a nother thread today. Go and have a look.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
none of this belongs here - in science - I know
Originally posted by GrayFox
Okay... what? You don't believe in people having a will? That... just doesn't make sense.
3.3 Do We Have Free Will?
A recent trend is to suppose that agent causation accounts capture, as well as possible, our prereflective idea of responsible, free action. But the failure of philosophers to work the account out in a fully satisfactory and intelligible form reveals that the very idea of free will (and so of responsibility) is incoherent, or at least inconsistent with a world very much like our own... Smilansky takes a more complicated position, on which there are two ‘levels’ on which we may assess freedom, ‘compatibilist’ and ‘ultimate’. On the ultimate level of evaluation, free will is indeed incoherent.
The will has also recently become a target of empirical study in neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Benjamin Libet conducted experiments designed to determine the timing of conscious willings or decisions to act in relation to brain activity associated with the physical initiation of behavior. Interpretation of the results is highly controversial. Libet himself concludes that the studies provide strong evidence that actions are already underway shortly before the agent wills to do it. As a result, we do not consciously initiate our actions, though he suggests that we might nonetheless retain the ability to veto actions that are initiated by unconscious psychological structures.
Free Will, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
let's say this experiment actually continues long enough (however long that will take) that at some point it becomes aware - of itself - no different than where we are now - or even as much as we were in our distant past
I just feel that knowing yourself - proves the self
2 things can be true at the same time
Originally posted by Astyanax
A Bit Too Philosophical?
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
none of this belongs here - in science - I know
Yes, I'm getting a bit uncomfortable about that myself. If the moderators feel this fits better in the Philosophy forum, I shan't object to its being moved there.