I just made a thread about this. Its amazing how truly orwellian the liberals have become. The issue isnt whether Mccains pick is hypocritical, since Palins isnt at the top of the ticket. The hypocracry is on the part of the democrats who believe that Palin is unqualified to be Veep, yet somehow also beleive that Obama is Qualified to be President.

Do liberals not understand the difference between President and Vice president? Do they not understand that every attack the Obama camp makes on the Bottom of the Mccain/Palin ticket, highlights the glaring inaqequcies at the Top of the Obama/Biden Ticket?
On what alternate world does having a less experienced VP argue for a less experienced POTUS? How exactly do libbies think that they will be able to attack Palin without Obama becoming even less electable?


Alos can anyone explain to me how being a "community organiser" counts for as much as the smegma on the end of a fly's phallus when it comes to experience? I really dont understand what the big deal about being a "community organiser" is. Sicne when is that the profession of profundity?



The other thread I started

Hypocracy?

Since Mccain announced Palin for Veep, I hear many democrats and liberals questiong her "qualification" to be veep. But isnt it hypocritical to believe that Palin is UNqualified to be VICE-President, while also beliving that Obama IS qualified to be President? And if not, why not?

Bottom line, on the republican ticket, someone has to die to put an "inexperienced" person in the hot seat, on the democratic ticket, the "inexperienced" person IS the ticket. To me, thats a huge difference.

[edit on 9/2/2008 by Shazam The Unbowed]

Originally posted by southern_Guardian

Well you see most Obama supporters are not arguing as to the amount of experience Mrs Palin has... My post here is to highlight the hypocrisy from the McCain campaign and their "experience" talk over these past few months. The mans a hypocrite for choosing a lesser experienced VP two heartbeats away from taking the main position, after months of "experience" talk.



Ok so this is a case of the inexperienced calling the experienced a hypocrite for choosing an inexperienced? What exactly is the experience that the inexperienced has in order to judge who has proper experience?

Originally posted by wutone
Ok so this is a case of the inexperienced calling the experienced a hypocrite for choosing an inexperienced? What exactly is the experience that the inexperienced has in order to judge who has proper experience?

broken records.

"experience" has been the core arguement from righties to justify McCain as the only "rational choice", you guys couldnt care as to whether the candidate had good judgement or whether he voted 95% of the time with the worst president in history afew months ago. Now I am using the "experience" arguement as you all so brag about and there you go, I highlighted the fact McCain goes ahead and chooses somebody less experienced after all.

Now as for Obamas pick, no I dont think his hypocritical for choosing Biden because he never made the "exeprience" arguement as sole justification for being elected, it just wasnt the only reason. Republicans have made it the CORE reason.


[edit on 2-9-2008 by southern_Guardian]

if im not mistaken

isnt the McCain campaign the one comparing Palin to Obama?

Unbelievable how short term memory has faded from the conservative mindset.

[edit on 9/2/2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]

Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
if im not mistaken

You are

isnt the McCain campaign the one comparing Palin to Obama?

No, it started on those left wing trash sites as soon as she was picked.

get you facts straight before you go smearing feces on the boards.

Me facts are straight, most of the feces spread on this board started @dkos.

Unbelievable how short term memory has faded from the neocon mindset.

Remember, we are also traditionalist who look past the recent blunders by the left and maybe concentrate on our heritage too much.

Originally posted by Dronetek
Ok go for it. It only cements the fact that Obama isn't ready to be president. Palin isn't running for President you know. Obama is and you guys are admitting now that experience does matter. So, doesn't that disqualify your candidate?

Nobody said experience wasnt important, The Obama camp has been arguing that it shouldnt be the core reason, yet righties have turned it into the core reason. Do you get it?

I am making experience a big deal because it was righties that have been making it a big deal for months now, and then they elect somebody with half the experience Obama has.

1. Experience is actually a bad thing

I never said that, but since you feel the need to add words into what I say to suit your arguement, well shame on you.

2.The VP choice doesn't really matter.

in McCains case it does, the mans 72years old running for a position that will add 6 extra years to your life every year your in office. The VP choice matters and I recall not too long ago that Republicans were making a BIG DEAL about it. The VP position represents somebody who is second in line to the whitehouse, and this is significant especially in McCain case. His choice of an inexperienced VPer goes against his core arguement and shows us howmuch of a flip flopper he is, and since he chose somebody nearly half that experienced than Obama, well then that arguement is in a favour now isnt it?

Now you're trying to argue exactly the opposite,

And where did I argue opposite? I stated that experience has been the core arguement and reason by righties to vote in McCain depsite his history of flip flopping and Bush kissing, now Im using that very arguement against McCains joke of a choice.

because you are threatened by Palin?

Oh and what on earth makes you think that? Are trying to reassure yourself of something here?

If we are supposed to beleive that experience now DOES matter, than why in the world would you vote for Obama, who has almost no experience and is running for the presidency (unlike Palin)?

Don I clearly indicated where Mrs Palin was less experienced than Obama, if you want to go against my arguement then tell us just where Mrs Palin has more experience. Limbaugh and the other rightiwing media sources and blogs cant seem to tells us why Mrs Palin is more experienced other than her state geography. All I seem from them is fake praise for the woman, I hear talk of more experience but no specifics. Maybe you could give a better answer than them?

If you ask me, McCain knows what hes doing. It forces you guys to admit experience does matter, which undercuts your candidate for PRESIDENT..

Obama has nearly double the amount experience and certainly is more educated, theres no comparison with Mrs Palin, only a rightwing created illusion.

Once again people have every right to launch at Mrs Palin and her "experience" credentials because Republicans have made this their core arguement through the entire election. The Obama campaign has not made experience the core reason for POTUS, so therefore I have every opportunity to show you all what a hypocrite McCain is.

I see the righties are doing damage control again, more raids to cover McCains flop of a choice.



[edit on 2-9-2008 by southern_Guardian]

Ok all you Neocons...

The McCain arguement against Obama is he has less experience. That and Obama's black, but right now we're focusing on his experience.

Now McCain has turned around and chosen someone with LESS experience than Obama.

That is the flip flop. That McCain, and you Neocons, have been screaming for weeks now that Obama has less experience,(And he's black oh noes!) and so shouldn't be elected then turn around and nominate someone less experienced then Obama.

And it does matter. McCain is old. He's even said his SS number is 8 so he knows he's old. He might not even make it to election day. So his VP choice does matter as he probably won't make it to the end of his term.