It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dominicus
reply to post by Good Wolf
If eye-witness testimony is unreliable then nobody knows what is true and what is false. In that case there is no such thing as fact and there is no such thing as absolute truth. Same goes for science, logic, rationale.
But who are you to say what is rational and what is irrational??? Is Christiantiy being silly & Irrational a fact???? Are you Irrational & silly for even stating the above notion??.
And don't give me that 'God cannot be rationalised by feeble human minds' crap, because god is not complex
This is a huge contradiction for you to state this because you say this as if you know God, when you just said your agnostic?
But based on this "not complex" assumption you have about God ...I will say having Spiritual enlightenment myself and knowing God to be real ...this realization I live with is rather simple ...but to say God is not complex is the biggest understatement I ever heard or ever will in my life.
On top of that, these are the minds that he supposedly bestowed us with, so I don't see why he make them feeble, he wouldn't.
Well the thing about that is .....we used to exist with the ability to comprehend and have relationships and see God.
But at the end of the day, one only believes in God subjectively, because while seeing is believing, believing is not knowing, nor is seeing. It takes more than an indeterminable indemonstrable 'experience' to 'know' such things.
So than what constitutes "knowing" according to you? Because the way you stated the above paragraph, it seems to me that to "know" something according to your ideologies, is something that's virtually impossible to do. I am of course assuming this based on your words above.
In the words of Aron Ra:
As if I can't have opinions!!
You can talk to you're blue in the face, but this is all still subjective, so you need to replace "Knowing God to be real" with "believing God to be real".
Bwahaha! I'm not sure I can be bothered spending anymore time with this. Go to one of the many threads here and learn that the earth is not 6000 YO
I 'know' gravity exists because I can prove it, and I don't need faith or spiritual blinder-ER 'interpreters'.
One can not draw simply on experience to prove anything. Take for example all the people who say they have been abducted. They believe it, some even claim to 'know' it, yet they can't prove it to any stretch of the imagination.
Belief is not knowledge, nor is it evidence, so it certainly isn't proof of anything, nor is it indicative of truth.
Imagine travelling through time and getting someone that believes that the earth is flat and putting him in a lie detector test. Ask him is the earth flat. The answer will be yes and the machine will say he believes what he says (if he's lucky because they margins are large). Yet is the earth flat? No. We 'know' that as a fact.
And by the way "subjective truth" doesn't exist, truth is not subjective but beliefs are. Ones experiences are not evidence
Ones experiences are not evidence
After all, absolute truth is unattainable by us
and the supernatural is untestable, by it's very nature.
After all, absolute truth is unattainable by us
That's an absolute statement. To say there is no absolute truth is an absolute statement, so you just put yourself in a hole with that one.
Parrots repeat themselves over and over again too. Eventually you need to get passed saying “hello” .
Originally posted by TruthParadox
I can tell that you have not kept up with this thread, as I have repeated myself over and over and over again.
Baseless assumptions; Doubtful
I will name the contradictions and you will ignore them as others have. Or worse yet, you will make an excuse which I will prove to be even worse than the first choice.
Contradictions:
1) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God creating a flawed world.
2) Contradiction of an omnipotent God being tricked by his creation (Satan) as if he didn't see it coming.
3) Contradiction of an infinite being creating something. If he was infinite, then he would contradict himself in creating something.
How is G*d contradicting “himself” here? The portrayal of G*d in the New and Old Testament is linear in relation to time and perception . . .
4) Contradiction of the God of the Old Testament being completely different than the God of the New Testament.
considering only 1 out of your first 4 proposed “contradictions” are even capable of being contradictions; I’m going to assume you’re off your mark with that calculation. But please, give me a small number, or any number, that you can provide evidence for.
5) Hundreds, if not thousands, of contradictions in the Bible which can not be explained.
6) Contradiction of a creator judging his creation for how he himself made his creation.
7) Contradiction of the Bible and scientific evidence. The Earth is not 6,000 years old, it is millions of years old, and there is proof of this.
8) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God having a struggle with one of his creations (Satan).
9) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God needing our love.
when did this happen??? Even if true, this is not contradictory, it is ironic.
10) Contradiction of a perfect God to create us to use logic and then expect us to take him on faith.
11) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God showing surprise and forgetting things as seen in the Old Testament.
12) Contradiction of a loving God sending us to Hell.
This is the tip of the iceberg.
I could go on all day but I won't because it doesn't serve any real purpose. You arn't going to look at anything I say in the perspective of seeking truth, but rather in the perspective of trying to prove me wrong and defend your belief which has no evidence.
If the Bible is the word of God or if the Bible is an accurate description of God, then the contradictions stand.
Seems I’m able to defend these “things” through logic and epistemology without even considering “G*ds’” affiliation with the Judeo-Christian writings.
If God is not the God of the Bible, then one might be able to defend these things
A deity is more complicated than a coin.
First of all, why not any other of the 3000 gods?
We start off with 1/3000 chance.
We look at science, and the contradictions I've named above, and the God as depicted in the Bible falls drasticly.
I can't give you an exact number, but the liklihood that God exists is the same probability as Zeus, as we have no evidence to state otherwise.
Originally posted by JPhish
If an all powerful being lies to you and wants to conceal that it is lying to you. It doesn’t matter anyway.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Why?
How do you know that you arn't worshiping the Devil?
If you abandon logic of the physical and take into account all the possibilities of the spiritual, for all we know, the Devil locked God up in a cage and is tricking us into worshiping him.
I don't believe God or the Devil exist.
I am simply stating that when you take logic out of the physical and try to put it into something you can't know anything about, anything is possible.
A perfect omnipotent God would not ask us to do this for obvious reasons.
I make perfect sense as seen by the fact that you can't respond in a logical manner to disprove what I say.
It's his(G*ds) responsibility (to tell us he exists), because otherwise we get sent to Hell for using logic instead of blind faith.
It’s quite a bold statement to say that there is no physical evidence. Have you visited every inch of this planet? Better yet, how can you be so sure that the evidence is not right under your nose? Or behind it
if God puts us on this planet with no physical evidence of him, and then sends us to Hell for not believing in him, then he is playing odds for the purpose of playing odds.
We have free will, but it doesn't matter because some people obviously do not have the information to make what you would consider to be the correct choice.
How hard would it be for an all powerful God to give us some kind of evidence of his existence?
Originally posted by JPhish
Contradictions:
1) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God creating a flawed world.
Who said that G*d is a perfect omnipotent being? Who said that the world is flawed??? Even if both were the case; this is still not a contradiction. Let’s delve deeper . . .
Originally posted by JPhish
Perfection can only be addressed by philosophical means because we have no instrument capable of determining anything’s perfection, or lack there of. Philosophically speaking, something being imperfect is not a requisite for it to yield a product of imperfection.
Originally posted by JPhish
2) Contradiction of an omnipotent God being tricked by his creation (Satan) as if he didn't see it coming.
When did an omnipotent G*d get tricked by “his” creation exactly? Regardless, something that is omnipotent can be deceived; something that is omniscient cannot. Define your terms! This is only possibly a contradiction.
Originally posted by JPhish
3) Contradiction of an infinite being creating something. If he was infinite, then he would contradict himself in creating something.
You need to brush up on the concept of infinity. Infinity deals with limits and boundaries.
In laymen’s terms and in relation to math, if oo was a “real” “number”; any real numbers added or subtracted from oo still equal oo. Since the mass of the universe can purportedly be measured using real numbers (around 1.6 × 1055 kg). The destruction or creation of the universe is inconsequential to oo.
Originally posted by JPhish
How is G*d contradicting “himself” here? The portrayal of G*d in the New and Old Testament is linear in relation to time and perception . . .
4) Contradiction of the God of the Old Testament being completely different than the God of the New Testament.
Originally posted by JPhish
considering only 1 out of your first 4 proposed “contradictions” are even capable of being contradictions; I’m going to assume you’re off your mark with that calculation. But please, give me a small number, or any number, that you can provide evidence for.
5) Hundreds, if not thousands, of contradictions in the Bible which can not be explained.
Originally posted by JPhish
6) Contradiction of a creator judging his creation for how he himself made his creation.
Again, not a contradiction; anyone can judge anything that they can perceive, regardless as to whom created it or even if they themselves created it. I can draw a picture right now and judge it as poor, great, etc.
Originally posted by JPhish
7) Contradiction of the Bible and scientific evidence. The Earth is not 6,000 years old, it is millions of years old, and there is proof of this.
When did the bible claim that the earth is 6,000 years old? I must have missed that part. Even if it did; science has been wrong many times in the past. I hope you are not foolish enough to hold the most recent conclusions of science as truths.
Originally posted by JPhish
8) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God having a struggle with one of his creations (Satan).
If this is literally true, then this is a contradiction. But when did this happen???
Originally posted by JPhish
Again, who said that G*d is perfect or omnipotent?
Originally posted by JPhish
9) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God needing our love.
When did this happen??? Define the needs of a perfect omnipotent being. Or better yet, define love.
Originally posted by JPhish
when did this happen??? Even if true, this is not contradictory, it is ironic.
10) Contradiction of a perfect God to create us to use logic and then expect us to take him on faith.
Originally posted by JPhish
11) Contradiction of a perfect omnipotent God showing surprise and forgetting things as seen in the Old Testament.
Would be a contradiction if it had happened, but I don’t believe it did and you have no proof that it did. Have you ever heard of a rhetorical question??? Yeah, I’m sure Aristotle wasn’t the first to think of one.
Originally posted by JPhish
12) Contradiction of a loving God sending us to Hell.
My mother is a very loving person; but if you were to spat in her face, I’m sure she wouldn’t show much love to you. Not a contradiction.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
I'm desperately looking for the answer to two questions:
1) Does a God(s) exist? and,
2) Is there an afterlife?
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Christians say he is a perfect omnipotent God.
Our world is flawed because it is not perfect.
It does not match the creation of a perfect omnipotent God.
Interesting analogy; but I’m not seeing how “we” as a collective can possibly gauge the perfection of the universe. Human beings have subjective views of the world. What might need to be added or taken away from this world to make it perfect in your mind, may render it extremely flawed in another's.
Think of it like a container. The most perfect something can be is the best case scenario which fits in that container. God created our world and therefor we have a 'container' to base what is perfect and what is not. Our world does not live up to a perfect God's creation.
Satan rebelled against God. If God is all knowing then he would never have created a being which would later rebel against him unless he spawned that evil. If he spawned that evil then he is not pure good like Christians claim. You can't have it both ways. He can not be all knowing AND pure good. It doesn't work.
I already showed that based on our current mathematical knowledge, “infinity” is the improper word to use for your argument. So I’ll just skip that.
Christians claim God is infinite as in all encompassing. If he is all encompassing, then he would have no need or want to create anything. Humans have a desire to create because we do not yet obtain it. An infinite being would possess all and would contradict itself in creating anything.
Read God's commandments to us mere mortals in the Old Testament and compare it to the New Testament. In the OT, it's completely fine to kill your enemies if they disagree with you. In the NT, you are supposed to love these same people. An infinite, all knowing, never changing God would not do this.
What I layed out were contradictions, you merely didn't understand them.
www.ffrf.org...
There's a good site for some biblical contradictions. Once your done with that, google 'biblical contradictions' for more.
It is not a contradiction on God's existence, but rather a contradiction in logic.
You could judge your art, but would you be judging the ink on the paper or would you be judging your performance?
that’s what it is.
This was my point. God Judges the ink on the paper for being ink on the paper.
If he made us the way we are
So now you know the rules that would fall upon an infinite, omnipotent and omniscient being? I’m sorry but wouldn’t you have to be the latter in order to know this???
(if)he is omnipotent, omniscient, infinite, etc, then he should judge his work, not us for being the ink on the paper as we were created to be.
So how many artists do you know that judge the ink for being ink, or the charcoal for being charcoal, or the paint for being paint?
I doubt the belief the world is 6,000 years old is common. Technology to back what up exactly?
True, the Bible never directly states the earth is 6,000 years old. This was less an attack on the Bible and more on the common belief of scholars who have interpreted the Bible. And you say that science has been wrong in the past. True, but more than ever we should trust what the data shows us today because we have the technology to back it up.
You said "When did this happen?". Have you read the Bible? There is supposedly a struggle taking place right now between God and Satan despite the fact that God is omnipotent.
This site explains it: www.cogwriter.com...
If you want the short answer:
“Alleluia! For the Lord God Omnipotent reigns!” (Revelation 19:6)
And:
Matthew 19:26 "But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."
I shouldn't have said need, I should have said want. I made a mistake there. It's a commonly held belief in Christianity that God desires our love and fellowship. But an infinite being would not desire anything because he would already be 'complete'.
This is another logical contradiction. He could do this, but it would be illogical. Seeing as God is all knowing, I doubt he would make such an illogical decission.
It is written many times that we must take God on faith.
There is no physical evidence for God.
Humans are physical and interpret things through physical senses.
No argument here.
This is a weaker argument because you could argue against what the words mean, so I'll leave it at that.
But would she send me to eternal Hell? No crime fits that punishment. An all knowing & loving God would know this.
Originally posted by JPhish
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Christians say he is a perfect omnipotent God.
Our world is flawed because it is not perfect.
It does not match the creation of a perfect omnipotent God.
Ok some Christians say this. I’m sure that non Christians say this. Not everyone falls into neat little categories; that’s all I’m trying to say . . . I would hate to think your position on whether or not G*d is perfect or exists at all is reliant on what some people think.
Originally posted by JPhish
Interesting analogy; but I’m not seeing how “we” as a collective can possibly gauge the perfection of the universe. Human beings have subjective views of the world. What might need to be added or taken away from this world to make it perfect in your mind, may render it extremely flawed in another's.
Think of it like a container. The most perfect something can be is the best case scenario which fits in that container. God created our world and therefor we have a 'container' to base what is perfect and what is not. Our world does not live up to a perfect God's creation.
Originally posted by JPhish
Satan rebelled against God. If God is all knowing then he would never have created a being which would later rebel against him unless he spawned that evil. If he spawned that evil then he is not pure good like Christians claim. You can't have it both ways. He can not be all knowing AND pure good. It doesn't work.
Why would G*d not create something that would rebel against him? You’re failing to explain why this entity would not do this.
Originally posted by JPhish
“Curses” can arise as a result of “miracles”; and visa versa; good and evil are subjective. For something to be good it need only be agreeable to the person deciding its value. Since G*d would be the final decider of what is good. “He” could annihilate everything on this earth right now and it would be a good idea. If “he” thinks it s good idea; it’s a good idea. It’s a purely good idea actually . .
the definitions of good and bad are dependant on G*ds will the same way that G*d can not sin. The act of sinning is any deviation from G*ds will. Since the act is reliant upon what he wants; G*d is directly incapable of sin. The same way G*d is incapable of evil . . . philosophically and hypothetically, if G*d turned you into a def, blinde, mute, and dumb paraplegic, it would be a good thing.
Originally posted by JPhish
All encompassing simply means that everything “he” does create is connected to/a part him. That’s all it means. Your previous argument was flawed and the new one you’re presenting is not valid.
Originally posted by JPhish
Again . . . The portrayal of G*d in the New and Old Testament is linear in relation to time and OUR perception . . . G*d is incapable of being unchanging based on our own perception of reality because our perceptions are constantly changing in time . . . tell me, Mathematically speaking . . . is the number 3 the same as the numbers 5438? 2139128721412231? oo? Those are different numbers which infinity encompass’s.
Originally posted by JPhish
What I layed out were contradictions, you merely didn't understand them.
www.ffrf.org...
There's a good site for some biblical contradictions. Once your done with that, google 'biblical contradictions' for more.
I have a good site that shows that world is flat too. Try using your own brain instead pulling things off websites.
Originally posted by JPhish
Your basic misunderstanding of these flawed arguments is not boding well for you.
Originally posted by JPhish
You could judge your art, but would you be judging the ink on the paper or would you be judging your performance?
Perhaps both; if I paint something and conclude that the paint I mixed together was poor, or had become too dry. It would have nothing to do with my performance of actually painting. But the materials I obtained or created being poor or becoming poor as a result of time, change or even lack of consistency.
Originally posted by JPhish
If he made us the way we are
i believe that what we are is what we make of ourselves.
Originally posted by JPhish
So now you know the rules that would fall upon an infinite, omnipotent and omniscient being? I’m sorry but wouldn’t you have to be the latter in order to know this???
(if)he is omnipotent, omniscient, infinite, etc, then he should judge his work, not us for being the ink on the paper as we were created to be.
Originally posted by JPhish
So how many artists do you know that judge the ink for being ink, or the charcoal for being charcoal, or the paint for being paint?
I actually do have one friend who is an artist. He judges his inks, paints, acrylics, papers and canvas sometimes more than the actual work itself. Any artist knows that materials used or created during the process are just as important as the technique or overall composition of the piece.
Originally posted by JPhish
Technology to back what up exactly?
Originally posted by JPhish
You said "When did this happen?". Have you read the Bible? There is supposedly a struggle taking place right now between God and Satan despite the fact that God is omnipotent.
No, I have never “rehd” the bible much past geneses. But my logic tells me to question the veracity of opinions or beliefs before even attempting to rebut them. But please. Point out in the bible where this struggle is taking place for me.
Originally posted by JPhish
This site explains it: www.cogwriter.com...
If you want the short answer:
“Alleluia! For the Lord God Omnipotent reigns!” (Revelation 19:6)
And:
Matthew 19:26 "But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."
Great, so in the bible it alludes that G*d may be omnipotent.
Originally posted by JPhish
I know basketball clips from the 90’s where the sports announcers claim that Jordan is too.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
But it's not based on "what some people think". I'm starting to understand how little of the Bibe you have actually read.
How many times must I point out the verses of the Bible to a Christian who is trying to defend his/her belief IN the Bible?
Rather ironic isn't it?
I suggest you read the book which you trust your eternal soul in .
But the Bible SAYS God is perfect. Also, you are trying to argue the definition of perfect instead of the argument at hand. That's a very weak stance.
Originally posted by JPhish
Why would G*d create something that would rebel against him? You’re failing to explain why this entity would not do this.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Because, that would negate him being perfect =o.
this really doesn’t have anything to do with what I was addressing, but to digress . . . the bible claims that we know of good and evil. Not that we can determine it as G*d does. Philosophically; We only have subjective discernment of what is good. But G*d decides what is and is nit good. There is a difference.
How much of the Bible have you read again?
Have you forgotten that we ATE from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? This is why we are ashamed when we are naked, remember? The effects are supposedly still with us today. We ARE (according to the Bible) able to determine what is good and evil JUST AS GOD.
So then Satan is a part of God since he created him?
It says he is without iniquity.
The Devil is NOT without iniquity.
Therefor, God can not encompass all without also encompassing the Devil and therefor iniquity.
Again, you can't have it both ways, but you seem to want to so bad that you ignore what the Bible AND logic say.
I said “real numbers” before; So yes.
But if God was infinite, and we think of it in numbers, then he would also encompase all the negative number, correct?
This is subjective before anything else . . . I actually like negative numbers more than the positive. I think they are better and more agreeable to my nature. For me negative numbers are “good”.
Yet the Bible says God is good, therefor he would NOT encompase the negative.
Killing a gay person is negative.
Killing someone because they never heard of God is negative.
Killing your own child if he/she rebels against you is negative.
doubtful; and hypothetically you only have the capability of knowing what is “good” and “evil”.
And I KNOW that those are negative because I ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, right?
you miss my point . .i don’t wish for you to share your material off other websites AT ALL. I wouldn’t want you to repost excerpts from articles here, any more than I would want to see links to those websites you might draw them from. I want you to use your own logic and reasoning skills. Not someone else’s with which whom you happen to think you agree with at the moment.
I would have listed them here but I did not have enough room to so I gave you a link.
Like all creationists, you ignore them. I didn't expect you to do otherwise.
Your narrow mindedness is not boding well for you.
No offense, but I'd rather debate against someone who actually knows what the Bible says. I'm getting tired of looking up these verses for you.
But you would NOT be judging the ink that you yourself chose. You would be judging that you chose the wrong ink.
Originally posted by JPhish (paraphrased)
It would have to do with the materials I obtained or created being poor or becoming poor as a result of time, change, or even lack of consistency.
In relation to what???
Originally posted by TruthParadox
Do you judge 0 for being 0? Do you judge a pancake for being a pancake?
If you say yes to the above than I'd rather not argue with you anymore, as logic seems to bounce right off of you.
Originally posted by JPhish
i believe that what we are is what we make of ourselves.
No, because this line of reasoning is flawed. Mathematically, accepting the premise of “free will” (which you do) G*d gives us choices. “he” says to us. “Choose” “1 or 2” then again, “2 or 3” and so on and so forth. We choose in accordance. Our choices shape and mold our reality and who we are . . .
Then your belief goes against the Bible as the Bible says God is omnipotent.
If God is omnipotent and omniscient, then when he created us, he created us to be us. If you write down on a paper 1+1=2 then you are responsible for writting 1+1=2, not the paper.
The serpent in geneses is LYING. The serpent says that Adam and Eve upon eating from the tree of knowledge would be as G*d. It is blatantly and obviously a lie based on the way the rest of the story carries out. Your entire tract is based on what a deceitful serpent said. You have knowledge of good and evil but as I expressed before. You only have the capability of knowing what is “good” and “evil”.
Due to the tree of knowledge of good and evil, I know that judging your creation for what you create it to be is evil, as the creator is responsible for his/her creation.
Also, it makes no sense for him to judge us for how he created us.
my friend makes his ink and paint from scratch . . . that’s why I used him as an example . . . he may mix them “perfectly” (to use the word loosely), but time can always taint it and make it un-agreeable.
Yes but your friend did not create the ink to be the right ink, he is 'judging' it because it's not what he expected or wanted it to be (ie bad brand).But God is different, because he's omniscient and omnipotent, remember?
So essentially, your friend isn't judging the ink, he's judging the companies creation of the faulty ink - as it should be.
the Earth is older than 6,000 years old.
It’s not that I want to know what the bible says. I want you to back up your claims, regardless of their validity.
No, you're right. God and Satan are really friends deep down, there is no struggle. All of the talk in the Bible about spiritual warfare is all a pile of crap. You're right and the Bible is wrong.
Sorry, but if you want to know what the Bible says, then look it up yourself. I'm not going to hunt down scriptures anymore.
It's a waste of time anyway because you'll just say "oh no that's not what it means, it really means - blah blah blah".
Originally posted by JPhish
Great, so in the bible it alludes that G*d may be omnipotent.
we’re dealing with a translated text so I think it best not to deal in absolutes. Interpretation of translations change as our understanding of language increases. Next week the translations could read something completely different. But I wouldn’t disagree with you that G*d as is depicted In the Bible was omnipotent and omnipresent . I’d just be a little less sure of myself.
Originally posted by TruthParadox
No, it doesn't allude to anything, it states very clearly and plainly that God is omnipotent.
Although possibly true, that’s not what I’m trying to convince you of. I’m pointing out that words and their meanings are often lost to the vernacular of their time. Etymology holds this to be true.
So what are you trying to convince me of exactly? That the Bible is no more authoritative than a 1990's sports announcer? I already knew this to be true, but I didn't think you would agree with me here.