The Problem with Barack Obama

Some ground work first

William Ayers, to whom Mr. Obama launched his political career with a fund raiser at the Ayers home , by his own admission, is a communist
And I quote from wiki
en.wikipedia.org...

Quote “”

“In an interview published in 1995, Ayers characterized his political beliefs at that time and in the 1960s and 1970s: "I am a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist ... [Laughs] Maybe I'm the last communist who is willing to admit it. [Laughs] We have always been small 'c' communists in the sense that we were never in the [Communist] party and never Stalinist's. The ethics of Communism still appeal to me. I don't like Lenin as much as the early Marx. I also like Henry David Thoreau, Mother Jones and Jane Addams”

He then holds a fund raiser for Barack Obama
Now you have assume that at the very least he thinks Barack is on the same page as he and Barack in turn has little if no disagreement with Ayres philosophy on how this country should be run
Therefore Barack’s ideal America would be based on communism


First I believe that the Democratic Party has been HIJACK by the Communist movement
And feel that Communism is illegal under the constitution of the United States
Now the Democrats Party’s is proud to parade its alumni
The cream of the talented artiste, actors, musicians, painters and on so on, who are hailed for their “outside the box” view , and that they enhance civility within society
Don’t you know that they are the first to be suppress in you communist utopia?
Food for thought:
from www.allaboutphilosophy.org...

Communism - Atheism and Amorality
Communism doesn't end with economic and political reform. By definition, it further demands the abolition of both Religion and the Absolute Morality founded upon Religion. The irony is that Communism supposedly attempts to enhance civility within society, but removes all notions of Absolute Morality, the very cornerstone of civility. Furthermore, after Communism is instituted by the people, the system becomes Totalitarian, resulting in greater oppression of the people it was designed to "serve." This fact is well documented throughout the history of Communist nations.

Communism - The Practical Results
The practical results of Communism have been horror and atrocity for those under communist rule. So much so, advocates of Marxism have made every attempt to point out where communist leaders have strayed from the fundamental teachings of Karl Marx, in an attempt to absolve Communism. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that Marxist influence brought about many of these horrors. The irony is, Marxism renounces religion, not because of religious doctrine, but because of the actions of "religious" men. No one could accuse a religion such as Christianity of evil doctrine. However, it seems that men are intrinsically evil and need only an opportunity to express this inherent reality. One must look at the overall outcome of a philosophical doctrine on society, both good and bad, not specific instances of abuse. Christianity, for example, has been used by wicked men to do much evil, but its underlying doctrine has been the cause of much good in the world. Communism, on the other hand, has brought only atrocity into the world. Communism has not brought relief to the majority as promised, nor has it ended oppression as purposed. Communism has only served to remove Morality from the masses -- a dangerous and costly experiment.

Corporate America has more than just it’s faults, it’s corrupt at so many levels, I am a consumer advocate and feel that this can be corrected, I’m furious at the ramped rip off’s from banks charging enormous fees for overdrafts, subscriptions rip offs, to people being ripped off just looking for a job (work at home, Yea right!)
But I feel that some much has been driven from America due to taxation (out sourcing) and labor unions, I remember my uncle (liberal) who was working for Florida Power and light telling me he would like to make fifty dollars an hour, but I wouldn’t want to pay him that and after looking at him and realizing he was serous, I said as long as you didn’t mind paying me fifty dollars an hour while cutting you grass! Basic economics tells you how fast that system would collapse
I work twice in construction for liberals that paid me on the basses of what they thought I needed to get by with and not what I was worth and in both instances I quit and got at least a 30% increase
In my life experience I’ve been treated well by conservative and cheated by liberals including my own family

They tell you the collective is the way to go, but what kind of exclusion are you ready to give them and why; since they say we’re all equal, why should they be exclude and deemed keeper of the commune, their just a bunch of envious, jealous, crybaby losers’ who instead of trying to make something out of their lives find it easier to just take it away from those who have accomplished something in their life and masquerade it in the name of equality "redistribution"

The only collective there is as far as I’m concerned is respect for this great country as well as this great world and we should no more tolerate Islamic women being killed for having there face expose as women having their face exposed in New York City, any liberals telling you that what someone else does on the other side of the world isn't their business is full of it , we’re in the dawn of a world community and we should demand by what ever means possible the fair treatment of humans and are apparently the only country ready do due so

With statements from Barack’s mentor William Ayres Stating
"Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments.”
And his wife Bernardine Dohrn, who was the host of Baracks fundraiser making this statement in about the recent Charles Manson led Tate-LaBianca murders at the time in a speech during the December 1969 "War Council" meeting organized by the Weathermen and attended by about 400 people in Flint, Michigan
"Dig it First they killed those pigs. Then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim's stomach! Wild!"

The liberal Party is all about the taking away from those who achieved something in life by those who would rather spend as little energy and effort in as they can in taking away from those who have made this country the a great innovative resource that it is

I would have to say that the democrat party are more akin to plutocrats than communists. The democrat voters tend to be the communist or socialist types. What is ironic is when a democrat politician with lots of money (like Edwards, Soros, Kerry) or one with that is part of huge dynasties (Kennedy, Rockefeller), tell the population that they fight for the common man.

Plutocracy is rule by the wealthy, or power provided by wealth. In a plutocracy, the degree of economic inequality is high while the level of social mobility is low.

-en.wikipedia.org...

This is what they are after, they want to keep everyone on welfare, or at least in some economic status that makes people rely on the government for needs. At the same time, much of the democrat (and republican) elite are usually billionaires or at least, very rich. Most industries and lobbyist groups (including pro Israel!?)also support the Democrats (except oil and automotive) which reveals exactly who the Democrats serve.

www.opensecrets.org...

As for Barack, he is just a creation of the media and the democrat party elite. The only skills he has are looking good in front of the camera and delivering a teleprompter led speech. He is also black, which makes him harder to hit in this world of political correctness.

As a senator, he voted along with party lines more than 90% of the time (change?) which means as president, he will be a good boy for the party as a whole. Nothing like a person who can push Democrat policy with his race and his media created cult-image..

My problem with Barack is that he will set up the tyranny of a Pelosi/Reid government.