It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mybigunit
Now this news has changed my argument because its not Ossetia creating their own country it is Russia gobbling up Ossetia.
Originally posted by mybigunit
This is different and now America DOES need to pay attention.
Originally posted by mybigunit
If Ossetia wanted to become its own country we should not say a damn thing but this does change things.
Originally posted by mybigunit
Now in regards to the dumb comment above "So now people want George to do something now" Yea this is the exact reason you dont bog yourself down in worthless wars.
Originally posted by mybigunit
Because when the real threats DO come you wont have the troops or resources to take on the real threat.
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
Despite the refusal of some to acknowledge the fact that Russia had imperialistic motivations to invade Georgia, Russia has announced what the rest of us have known all along. I believe that the annexing of South Ossetia is just the first step in Russia’s return to their cold war status. The rest of Eastern Europe better watch their backs because I think Ukraine will be next. If not Ukraine then it will be someone else, but mark my words, Russia is not done with its imperialism!
www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by DavidWright
Russia has a newly elected president but has Putin running the show
Originally posted by DavidWright
Is not Russia......a puppet government then?
It is paying attention. A bit too much attention. Maybe paying attention to America's own wars would be more useful.
U.S refuses to recognize the independence of S Ossetia and Abkhazia. U.S. even refuses to hold an official referendum there. As far as the West is concerned - to them there is no S Ossetia.
What would you want Bush to do - had he had the full U.S. military at his disposal? Start a war with Russia because of a tiny third world country rules by a reckless puppet? Now that won't be worthless now would it?
How do you tell real threats from imaginery threats? Was Taliban a real threat? Was Saddam? Was North Korea? Is Iran? Is the Axis of Evil a real threat? Do you let the White house press secretary tell you who the real threat is? Or do you let the media tell you what a real threat is?
You think Russia is a real threat. Why? Because of what you see on CNN or read in Newsweek? How do you know you aren't being lied to (again)? How do you know that you are being told the entire story? There is nothing wrong in having imagined enemies (no better way to build some nationalism) - but what is wrong is when your government actually starts a conflict with that imagined enemy.
Regardless of how many lies we have all seen and heard, and how many useless wars were waged - many still can't tell a real threat apart from a perceived threat or imaginary threat. Most offen the threat to one's country doesn't come from the outside but from inside.
Originally posted by DavidWright
I love all the talk about puppet governments.
Russia has a newly elected president but has Putin running the show
Is not Russia......a puppet government then?