Gaddafi's son: We lied about Lockerbie, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 29-8-2008 @ 07:33 PM by tezzajw

Gaddafi's son: We lied about Lockerbie


www.news.com.au
LIBYAN leader Muammar Gaddafi's son says his country accepted responsibility for the 1988 Lockerbie airliner bombing only to get sanctions lifted and called victims' families greedy.

Seif al-Islam admitted the move was hypocritical, saying he believed that Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi, the former Libyan intelligence officer convicted of the bombing, was not responsible.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 08:35 PM by bodrul
reply to post by tezzajw



on key evidence was left out
the eye witness who fingured the person out in the line up
had seen the image of the person beforhand in the paper

which meant that was flawed from the start
and something that should have been told to the defence team.

also these people are greedy mugs

family death = Big pay day and life of luxuary


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 09:45 PM by satire111
please read www.timesonline.co.uk...
i met a man called Hindawhi a palastinian who told me his distant cousin was responsable with others for the bombing of that plane in a response to the americans shooting down a civilian aircraft flying from iran over the straights of hormus see en.wikipedia.org...
he told me the device that set off the bomb was a mercury barometric type and the electronic device that was "found" at lockerbie scene was too modern for the bomb makers, this also fits facts about the height of pan am 103 due to bad weather the flight path took flight 103 above land for much further than normal and the required height for the bomb to detonate would have seen the plane past over Ireland & above the atlantic leaving many less clues as happened to a air india aircraft in 1985



reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 02:35 AM by dave420
reply to post by bubbles75



Do you have any evidence (beyond the circumstantial)? Or is this just guesswork?


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 08:59 PM by beefeater
reply to post by satire111



OK say hes telling the truth and the cia planed evidence, it still leaves me with the question of why? and who? If Libya was not responsible and it was a "response to the americans shooting down a civilian aircraft flying from iran over the straights of hormus" why was this not the story or inquiry, why was libya implicated, what was to gain from all this?
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 32 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 12 flags