Have we forgotten what VP is for?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 10:53 PM by GradyPhilpott
reply to post by MrMysticism



That would be a sight to see, but I think you're underestimating McCain.

McCain might not have much flash, but he's got substance.

Obama's good at the pep rally, but it remains to be seen how he will do on the field of play.


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 05:09 PM by vor78
reply to post by zlots331



Do we really want to trust a junior senator with 3 1/2 years of major political experience with running the country from day 1?

You can argue all day that Palin might be inexperienced and could struggle if she must assume the presidency, but she won't be there immediately. Obama will. Palin will have a learning curve, if she even has to assume that role at all over the next four years.

Obama? Its like giving your rookie QB his first career start in the Super Bowl. Good luck with that.


reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 03:08 PM by MrMysticism
reply to post by hotbakedtater



Ok, there is someone that has a grip on the realities of the countries state of affairs!


reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 04:35 PM by justamomma
reply to post by zlots331




In article 2 Section 1, the original constitution states:

In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President.



Because of (from what I have gathered thus far) conflict of parties however, the following ammendment replaced the original intent thus allowing for TWO seperate votes to take place by the electors (what we refer to as the electoral college now). In other words, the electors of the states would cast two votes, one for president and one for vice president.

This is laid out in Ammendment 12, which was passed by Congress on December 9, 1803 and ratified on June 15, 1804.

However, apparently even the afore mentioned ammendment became moot somewhere in the late 19th century and so even though the constitution clearly states that they are to be voted for seperately, in practice they are voted in together.


Why and how it got manipulated to blatantly violate the process as laid out in the constitution, I still am unclear on; but the fact remains that IT IS directly violating the voting process in our constitution.







[edit on 31-8-2008 by justamomma]


reply posted on 1-9-2008 @ 06:56 PM by zlots331
reply to post by justamomma



Wow, thanks. Very thorough and enlightening. Makes you wonder sometimes what other issues are just "conveniently" overlooked.



reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 05:12 PM by ZuzusPetals
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
reply to
post by MrMysticism
McCain might not have much flash, but he's got substance.


Giggle. Freaking, ha, ha, GIGGLE.

Yup.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 108 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 88 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies