It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheRooster
reply to post by jamie83
You're welcome, but were you thanking me or Wiggin?
Sorry for going off topic here but I just had to put my feelings into words...
I must be alone in my feelings because the MSM is reporting more than 38 million people watched BHO's speech, but I just couldn't do it! The brief moment that I actually watched made me sick to my stomach. I really don't know why either, I don't dislike the man personally, (although I have publicly stated I don't think he's qualified to be POTUS). Add to that what little I had watched of the DNC and I'm left wondering what happened to the humble gentlemen farmers or pioneers of industry that gave birth to this great nation? I wonder what the founding fathers would think if they had witnessed what happened last night?
How could he possibly have been so corrupted so quickly?
With Obama, not much was known to most, other than his BSing.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by TheRooster
Since you lack the maturity or decency to post my entire thread, allow me to do it for you
here is the thread
It talks about all 4 candidates....
Nice conservative tactic:
Ignore my entire post, omit the passages that make you look wrong - and then go with it
The title of the thread is Palin vs. Obama, who has more experience
and when its proven that obama has more experience, suddenly it doesnt matter?
The moronic masses strike again!!
Congratulations - you bathe in ignorance.
[edit on 8/29/2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]
Originally posted by jetxnet
How could he possibly have been so corrupted so quickly?
It's because he's always been corrupt. We're just finding out more about him as time goes on.
With Hillary and other candidates, it's been out there for years.
With Obama, not much was known to most, other than his BSing.
Now, we're starting to see more of what he is about. We'll see more yet as the election nears.
Obama is very experienced at one thing - and that is lieing at the pathological level.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Obama is more experienced, in every conceivable way.
Originally posted by jamie83
Palin has more experience than Barry O..
McCain has more experience than Barry O. and Joey B. put together.
And what happened to your promise that you were out of here? You keep popping back in making inane comments, lame insults, and generally acting like somebody peed in your cornflakes today.
Does McCain's choice of Palin really have you that worried that Barry O. has little chance of winning?
Originally posted by southern_Guardian
Jeeze what happened to Romney?
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by TheRooster
you're right
i wrote it
the question is "who is more experienced: Obama of Palin"
I didnt write that, are you dense?
I talked about all 4 candidates, to show that the obama ticket is more experienced than the mccain ticket
Originally posted by jamie83
The real question is what happened to all the pre-written Dem attack pieces on Romney, Huckabee, Pawlenty, and Ridge? Seems the best the MSM was ready with on Palin was the lame story that she may have "abused" her power by replacing one of her cabinet members.
Originally posted by TheRoosterAfter all, the title to this thread is "Decision 2008 » Palin vs. Obama... Who Has More Experience?" not "let's add up all of the experience of the "change" candidates and declare them winners".
I mean where do you guys get this garbage? Surely this doesnt all come from Limbaugh?
Originally posted by davionyou didn't know who the hell she was until today, and the media didn't know who the hell she was until today.