posted on Aug, 29 2008 @ 01:21 PM
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
First, Obama wasnt experienced enough as a senator. He didnt understand how to run things globablly because McCain had more
Yes, that is still VERY true. McCain is far more experienced at many things than Obama.
why is it that 2 yeras as an Alaskan governor make her more qualified than Obama?
Palin has experience being the Chief Executive of an entire state. Obama has zero experience managing anything. It's like comparing a consultant
(Obama) with a CEO of a company.
Perhaps you can provide proof to back this claim/ Because everything i know of mccain says he doesnt have 30 years....
You must have overlooked McCain's 28 years of experience in the Navy before he entered politics. See, unlike Obama, McCain had an entire career's
worth of experience before he even decided to run for office. Obama's career IS running for office.
why is it that you have to lie to make mccain look better?
Andy, there are no lies here. If McCain never even ran for the Senate, his 28 years in the Navy would still dwarf Obama's experience as a community
organizer, state senator, and U.S. senator.
The truth is Palin and Obama have comparable resumes, and I would argue that Palin's experience is more suited for Commander in Chief than
This is about Palin vs. Obama in terms of experience. Do you have anything to add regarding Obama's resume that I've missed?