It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Wow! Close Footage of a UFO?

page: 8
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in


posted on Sep, 3 2008 @ 07:03 PM

posted on Sep, 4 2008 @ 10:08 PM

Originally posted by bloodsearch
reply to post by maarek99

If you check some of the previous posts there is a link to a better video.

Here it is

I think it may have been just the quality of the youtube video, however look at the better quality video and see what you think. Personally I don't see any of the problems with the video that you describe.
Wow! more clear!
It looks like a Top Hat Gray Scout class spacecraft!

posted on Sep, 5 2008 @ 06:18 PM
anything is possible once one stops to think of it

Some of this stuff is real and some not discernement is what a person must use. What does your intuition say? Follow your intuittion and stop listening to mainstream media bull..... controling people's minds

Thay are very good at comtroling people's opinions,politically, religiously,socially.

posted on Sep, 5 2008 @ 07:23 PM

Originally posted by feydrautha
i produce cgi models animations and also use aftereffects. this looks like video of a real object, and would take quite a bit of effort to produce this artificially.

i dont see any evidence of greenscreening, or polygon scalloping. and the focal planes on the object look quite organic.

it may be a hubcap on a string, or whatever, but is a real object...

what gets me is, this guy is apparently visited by ufos regularly yet he can't be arsed to acquire a tripod?

Hey 'Sting', I 'm a BIG fan of Sting & The Police if it rings a vague historic bell to you... not sure... ever lived in the 80's? I did, I grew up in these, was a teenage.

Show me anything that burns out and come out CLEAN as a PARACHUTE, NO TRACE OF BURNING, then I will agree with you! AH AH!

Just put it in your PC with a Screen-capture program, analyse all photos, what do you see?

Balls of fire?

I cant believe threads like that, to me it's just entertainment, wow thanx!

posted on Sep, 5 2008 @ 10:47 PM
Doesn't keep filming it, way too clear compared to the rest of the video's quality, and the UFO appears to skip frames when it starts to move faster. I'm voting fake, but I'll keep an open mind for those who'd like to argue it, but did I mention that he doesn't keep filming it?
Oh, and he adds in music with slow-mo at the end... come on.

posted on Sep, 6 2008 @ 08:42 AM
reply to post by eaglewingz

ggod observation eagle. plus, i find it hard to get behind any video that has a soundtrack. and why the comparison to that other object? was that another ufo? they didn't look anything alike. interesting none the less...

phineas j whoopie

posted on Sep, 6 2008 @ 09:32 AM
Well, there's something that i would add about the story:
a TV show, started attacking them in a very strange way. They also reported about stuff that has nothing to do with UFOs and were extremely unfair in their judgements: i would even say that all the behavior of that show was suspect to say the least, as if they had the only target to devastate the reliability of these guys. And not only.
ANOTHER show, based on the sad story of Fortunato Zanfretta, turned out to be a show which real purpose was to tease them, and to LOL at the whole UFO phenomena. I was disgusted by that show, and i find their campaign to be very suspect: i would like to know WHY they did it. Imagine a TV show that every day says something negative about the same guys, for WEEKS. And the debunking of the flying horse, i recall it had some issue, but can't recall exactly what. Of course this proves nothing, but i think that yes, everyone should judge for himself: in my opinion their sightings are fakes (but NOT CGI), but since i can't prove it, it is just an opinion, nothing more: or maybe they had even some genuine sighting. It wouldn't be the first time that someone starts faking videos after a genuine sighting. As all the "contactees" of course they are suspect, and especially her claims are actually ridiculous and far fetched to say the least, not to mention the total lack of any evidence supporting her claims: besides, despite the sightings took place in a small town no one else seems to have ever noticed any UFO, except the ones mentioned in their website (anonymously) while we should be in front of a MASS sighting: even to recreate the SAME effect wouldn't prove anything: the only way would be to catch them while faking a video. Ah, adetail about this video: at some point she says to him to catch on camera some point of reference and his reply was "in the evening"? His reply was strange, it doesn't look so dark. In the other hand, while no one has seen their UFOs, also no one has seen them faking them, nor balloon being released etcetera. Just my two cents

<< 5  6  7   >>

log in