Fossils on Mars - A Collection of Evidence, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 63 times


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 12:23 PM by ziggystar60
reply to post by zorgon



Just want to tell you that I care. Therefore it is not true that nobody cares. Theory debunked! Unless perhaps I am a nobody...?

Seriously, zorgon, I don't think for a second that I am the only one who is grateful for the things you bring to the table here at ATS. And I certainly follow the links you provide and read documents. Your work is not waisted.

[edit on 30-8-2008 by ziggystar60]


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 01:34 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by fleabit
Fossils are rare. Go take a walk sometime, even in an remote mountain, or hilly countryside, where not many folks go. Look for fossils. See how many you find.


You have GOT to be kidding me... You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Try turning off the computer and go out into the real world

Any place where you find limestone you will find TONS of fossils
Any place where you find shale you will find TONS of fossils

Gobi desert Dinosaur bones are just lying around on the surface eroded out of the rock by winds
Road cuts are great... and rain washes out new ones daily from the mud rock

Maybe you just don't know where to look... just ask the local rock hound group in your area. Best place is limestone quarries... just ask permission and go on a Sunday


They don't form on the surface. Typically almost all are deposited as sediments by moving water.


Would you PLEASE stop spreading such disinfo... Ever heard of petrified wood? Its lying around all over the Arizona and Nevada desert. Those are tree fossils formed by silicas replacing the organic material. Opal beds same thing in Australia and Nevada the wood and sea shells are replaced by silica spheres...

THIS is the Gobi Desert... these people are picking up specimens just lying on the ground... dinosaur bones... I have a huge egg from the Gobi




National Geo did a special on that area skulls etc just lying on the surface

Sandstone Fish
Gobi desert


Same in Utah near Delta... pay the owner 20 bucks in a few hours you will have hundreds of dollars of specimens... same in the Trilobite beds in Delta

Here is a fossil just lying in the open on an eroding cliff


Eroding cliffs reveal new fossils every year.
www.novascotialife.com.../200


If you are going to debunk at least know what you are talking about


There is a reason that the most abundant fossils found on our own planet are marine fossils.


The reason is there are a lot of oceans and seashells reproduce in multitudes... but dino bones, petrified trees, etc are found all over the deserts in the US, China and other places What is RARE is full specimens intact...

I am willing to bet you have walked on fossils and never noticed them

But you know what? Who cares... believe what you wish...
Denying ignorance around here is a full time job



September is here and the rocks are cooler... time to go get more



reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 01:39 PM by rickyrrr
reply to post by zorgon



Even though I am what most here would call a believer, about the only image that jumps out at me is the rotellini and another of a pointy shell. Other's look interesting enough to have a second look or investigate further, but they are kind of hard to see for me.

The trillobite in particular is so dark in the mars picture that I cannot really make it out on my relatively decent monitor. I would have appreciated an enhancement of that area (a luminance boost) in addition to the picture of the known trillobite for a side to side comparison.

-rrr


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 01:40 PM by kidflash2008
reply to post by zorgon



Mr Zorgon, you do come up with a lot of different ideas.
While I can't say these are definately fossils, they are anomalies and the idea cannot be ruled out. The photos are a good example of anomalies that some can try to explain as rocks, but would need to be brought back for further analysis. Scientist do believe that Mars had oceans and possible life. Even ancient life would be an incredible find.

I always look forward to your posts, as they do interest me. Starred and flagged


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 03:11 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by zorgon



Actually your both right. They do form underground so to speak. Through various processes, they are buried and replacement occurs. Then through weathering and erosion they are exposed.

Huge numbers of vertebrate fossils are lost every year from the North Dakota - Montana area south through many states below. They weather away, uncollected. One big reason is the vertebrate fossils are illegal to collect except under the circumstance they happen to be found on a homestead patented prior to the 1880's I believe. I've always thought it sad how many are lost because the academicians with the politicians firmly in their hip pockets don't want anyone but them to touch them.

For the fossils sake it is best if they are unearthed rather than weathering to the surface as they remain in better condition. Sue, the T-Rex was found on a farm that met the requirements for the patented homestead and even then they had to go through court to keep their own property as the government and others tried to steal them by lying in court. Luckily for the owner the truth won that time.

In southern Utah where Dinosaur bone replaced by gem quality agate is plentiful (I know many locations, I'll never reveal), they enforce with huge fines. As a result much of it will not be collected as its location goes to peoples graves with them.

What were we talking about Old age, rambling thoughts an don't laugh you will be like this soon



reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 04:47 PM by Dronetek
reply to post by NephraTari



I just looked at all the pictures and I have to say the "artifact" picture definitely looked faked. Right away I noticed it looked like they used a blur tool to create the "artifact". Its probably already been stated a hundred times in this thread.

Originally posted by fleabit
Fossils are rare. Go take a walk sometime, even in an remote mountain, or hilly countryside, where not many folks go. Look for fossils. See how many you find.


What are you talking about? I can go in my back yard in Ohio, dig up some dirt and find fossils on the rocks. It might take me 10 minutes to find my first fossil.

[edit on 30-8-2008 by Dronetek]


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 04:56 PM by yeti101
reply to post by Dronetek


none of that changes the fact mars only had the first very violent billion years of our solar system to create complex life. The chances of that are pretty much nil







[edit on 30-8-2008 by yeti101]


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 04:57 PM by Dronetek
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to
post by Dronetek


none of that changes the fact mars only had the first very violent billion years of our solar system to create complex life.







I completely agree with you.

Thats a very good argument that I never thought of.

[edit on 30-8-2008 by Dronetek]


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 05:39 PM by Oldnslo
Originally posted by Dronetek
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to
post by Dronetek


none of that changes the fact mars only had the first very violent billion years of our solar system to create complex life.




I completely agree with you.

Thats a very good argument that I never thought of.

[edit on 30-8-2008 by Dronetek]


Pardon me, but just a question. How do you know this to be true.

Water is still flowing on the surface and if water has been on Mars for billions of years, there is no reason not to suspect that life, in many forms, may have existed throughout this entire period.

We also have no idea when Mars lost its atmosphere or when liquid water no longer existed on the surface.

So, at this time, I don't think we have enough facts to determine if and how long life has existed on Mars.


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 05:55 PM by Nola213
Sorry just got here, so I'm gonna comment on Zorgons, OP, and sunsequent exhibits only:

First off, star and flag for the amount of effort put into this presentation. Not to mention, it is extremely interesting.

I do agree that the "extraordinary, and unfathomable", pictures on the nasa, grid picture, are definitely fake, and artists representations of what exactly would be extraordinary, or unfathomable. But no they haven't found either the trilobite, or the other object, as you an Armap pretty much laid any questions that it might be real to rest. Good work on that.

When I first saw the very first picture in your exibit of "Humphrey", and the lil dotted circle showing where the supposed trilobite was supposed to be, in regaurds to the inset picture of a pristine trilobite fossile, i must say I was pretty much jumping out of the chair yelling that's no proff, and a hoax (in my head of course). I am glad you put that to bed quickly.

But as far as the Very, Very first picture of your first post, )the circular lichen) in this exhibit..... did anyone else notice the dozens of faces and geometric shapes that can be seen if you look at the entire picture for a few minute.

I mean look to the right of the center piece, It's Linda Blair right there from the Exorcists, as clear as day! There is another perfect face on the left. Then there is a grey alien bottom center, from waist up, with it's arms extended up. After that, you can see all sorts of little faces with look extremely detailed when you look at the enlarged picture. It's so blatantly clear I wonder if it's subliminal imagry on Nasas part. I know Adevertising likes to use the EXACT same types of faces, they are called "muppets" in the advertising idustry. they are used for a number of reasons, to get you to look at the area the subliminal face is looking at, usually the producted, or they get you to look away from something. Or they can be smiling to just give you a sense of well being. I found these muppets all over the enlarged Nasa picture.

The guys are smart, and they're pulling out all the stops to get us to see what they want, and try to not have us see what they don't want, by inserting these.

But as far as the "Turritella", great work, and fascinating. Now those I find to be pretty credible, and definitely need some more investigation, hopefully Nasa will provide you with some more images so you can continue to uncover more of these.

Again, great job on the work, excellent presentation.

I know i've left out alot, and the face stuff might be reaching on my part, or just a bad case a paradelia(sp?), but the Linda blair face really, really jumped out at me , yiked!


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 06:21 PM by yeti101
reply to post by Oldnslo



Water is still flowing on the surface and if water has been on Mars for billions of years, there is no reason not to suspect that life, in many forms, may have existed throughout this entire period.

no water has been found on the surface of mars. We know mars lost its magnetosphere 4 billion years ago . Bye bye atmosphere & water

we also know the history of mars is violent lots of volcanoes/lava and meteor impacts. The atmosphere is so sterile its likely theres no life on mars.

[edit on 30-8-2008 by yeti101]


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 06:44 PM by Vector J
reply to post by darkraver



I would absoultely love you post some example of all this flaming you claim that I did. Do you think maybe the mods missed it all and thats why all my posts are still intact?

And thank you, you have finally done what I asked. I asked you to show a comparisson picture outlining the similarities you see. You then spent about 10 posts evading that question and saying I was flaming you.

Now that you post the comparision, I see the similarities that you see. And nice picture of the hip cancer, that does indeed bare a passing resemblance.

We would still require pictures from other angles and in better resolution to create any real opnion at all. but yes, now that you have made it clear, I can see certain similarites. I don;t understand why it took you this long to do something so simple as to illustrate your point.

And by the way, we're not in a gang, we happened to agree on a point. The very notion that you would imply that we are part of some trolling or flaming group is both disrespectful and rude...
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 22 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags